The Human
Cost of Socialism in Power
By Richard Ebeling
The attempt to establish a comprehensive socialist system in many parts
of the world over the last one hundred years has been one of the cruelest and
most brutal episodes in human history.
Some historians have estimated that as many as 200 million
people may have died as part of the dream of creating a collectivist
"Paradise on Earth." Making a better "new world" was taken
to mean the extermination, the liquidation, the mass murder of all those that
the socialist revolutionary leaders declared to be "class enemies," including
the families, the children of "enemies of the people."
The Bloody Road to Making a New Socialist Man
We will soon be marking the hundredth anniversary of the
Bolshevik Revolution in Russia (November 1917) under the Marxist revolutionary
leader, Vladimir Lenin. In Soviet Russia, alone, it has been calculated by
Russian and Western historians who had limited access to the secret archives of
the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the KGB (the Soviet secret police)
in the 1990s that around 68 million innocent, unarmed men, women and
children were killed over the nearly 75 years of communist rule in the Soviet
Union.
The communist revolutionaries in Russia proudly
declared their goal to be destruction and death to everything that existed
before the revolution, so as to have a clean slate upon which to mold the new
socialist man.
The evil of the Soviet system is that it was not cruelty for cruelty's
sake. Rather it was cruelty for a purpose – to make a new Soviet man and a new
Soviet society. This required the destruction of everything that had gone
before; and it also entailed the forced creation of a new civilization, as
conjured up in the minds of those who had appointed themselves the creators of
this brave new world.
In the minds of those like Felix Dzerzhinsky, Lenin's
close associate and founder of the Soviet secret police, violence was an act of
love. So much did they love the vision of a blissful communist future to come
that they were willing to sacrifice all of the traditional conceptions of
humanity and morality to bring the utopia to fruition.
Thus, in a publication issued in 1919 by the newly formed
Soviet secret police, the Cheka (later the NKVD and then the KGB), it was
proclaimed:
We reject the old systems of morality and 'humanity' invented by the
bourgeoisie to oppress and exploit the 'lower classes.' Our morality has no
precedent, and our humanity is absolute because it rests on a new ideal. Our
aim is to destroy all forms of oppression and violence. To do so, everything is
permitted, for we are the first to raise the sword not to oppress races and
reduce them to slavery, but to liberate humanity from its shackles . . .
Blood? Let blood flow like water! Let blood stain forever the black
pirate's flag flown by the bourgeoisie, and let our flag be blood-red forever!
For only through the death of the old world can we liberate ourselves from the
return of those jackals.
Death and Torture as Tools of Winning Socialism
The famous sociologist Pitirim A. Sorokin was a young
professor in Petrograd (later Leningrad and now St Petersburg) in 1920 as the
Russian Civil War that firmly established communist rule in Russia
was coming to its end. He kept an account of daily life during those years,
which he published many years later under the title Leaves from a
Russian Diary – and Thirty Years After (1950).
Here is one of his entries from 1920:
The machine of the Red Terror works incessantly. Every day and every
night, in Petrograd, Moscow, and all over the country the mountain of the dead
grows higher . . . Everywhere people are shot, mutilated, wiped out of
existence . . .
Every night we hear the rattle of trucks bearing new victims. Every
night we hear the rifle fire of executions, and often some of us hear from the
ditches, where the bodies are flung, faint groans and cries of those who did
not die at once under the guns. People living near these places begin to move
away. They cannot sleep . . .
Getting up in the morning, no man or woman knows whether he will be
free that night. Leaving one's home, one never knows whether he will return.
Sometime a neighborhood is surrounded and everyone caught out of his
house without a certificate is arrested . . . Life these days depends entirely
on luck.
This murderous madness never ended. In the 1930s, during the
time of the Great Purges instituted by Soviet dictator Josef Stalin to
wipe out all "enemies of the revolution" through mass executions,
there were also sent millions to the GULAG prisons that stretched across all of
the Soviet Union to be worked to death as slave labor to "build
socialism."
Before being sent to their death or to the forced labor
camps, tens of thousands would be interrogated and cruelly tortured to get
confessions out of people about non-existent crimes, imaginary anti-Soviet
conspiracies and false accusations against others.
Stalin personally sent instructions to the Soviet secret
police that stated that in obtaining confessions from the accused, "the
NKVD was given permission by the Central Committee [of the Communist Party] to
use physical influence ... as a completely correct and expedient method"
of interrogation.
When Stalin was told that this method was bringing forth the
desired results, he told the NKVD interrogators, "Give them the works
until they come crawling to you on their bellies with confessions in their
teeth." Then, in another purge, this one after World War II, Stalin
simplified the instructions even more: "Beat, beat and, once again,
beat."
Thousands of the victims wrote letters to Stalin from their
exile and hardships in the labor camps, all of them persuaded that it had all
been a terrible mistake. If only Comrade Stalin knew, he would set it all right
and they would be freed and restored as good, loyal Soviet citizens ready to
once again work to "build socialism."
Stalin's Personal Hand in Building Socialism through Blood
But Stalin knew. He personally signed off on tens of
thousands of death warrants and orders for tens of thousands more to be sent to
their horrifying fate in the GULAG camps.
Domitri Volkogonov, a Soviet general-turned-historian,
gained access to many of the closed Soviet archives in the 1980s, and wrote a
biography of Stalin, entitled Triumph and Tragedy (1991), referring to Stalin's
"triumph" to power and the resulting "tragedy" for the
Soviet people. Volkogonov told a Western correspondent at the time:
I would come home from working in Stalin's archives, and I would be
deeply shaken. I remember coming home after reading through the day of December
12, 1938. He signed thirty lists of death sentences that day, altogether about
five thousand people, including many he personally knew, his friends . . .
This is not what shook me. It turned out that, having signed these
documents, he went to his personal theater very late that night and watched two
movies, including "Happy Guys," a popular comedy of the time. I
simply could not understand how, after deciding the fate of several thousand
lives, he could watch such a movie.
But I was beginning to realize that morality plays no role for
dictators. That's when I understood why my father was shot, why my mother died
in exile, why millions of people died.
Soviet central planning even had quotas for the number of
such enemies of the people to be killed in each region of the Soviet Union as
well as the required numbers to be rounded up to be sent to work in the labor
camps in the frigid waste lands of Siberia and the Arctic Circle or the
scorching deserts of Soviet Central Asia.
A Russian lawyer who had access to some of the formerly
closed Soviet archives of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the
Soviet Union in the 1990s told at the time:
Recently I read a Central Committee document from 1937 that said the
Voronezh secret police, according to the "regional plan," repressed
in the "first category," nine thousand people – which means these
people were executed. And for no reason, of course.
Twenty-nine thousand were repressed in the "second
category" – meaning they were sent to labor camps. The local first
secretary [of the Communist Party], however, writes that there are still more
Trotskyites and kulaks who remain "unrepressed."
He is saying that the plan was fulfilled but the plan was not
enough! And so he asked that it be increased by eight thousand. Stalin writes
back, "No increase to nine thousand!" The sickness of it. It's as if they were
playing poker [and upping the ante in tragic human lives].
The Victims of Socialism Literally Reduced to Burnt Ash
In the last years of the Soviet Union, a Russian historian
took The New York Times correspondent David Remnick to the
Donskoi Monastery in Moscow, which in the 1930s was used as a burial ground for
the thousands regularly killed on Stalin's orders in the capital of the Red
Empire. In his book, Lenin's Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire (1993),
Remnick told what the Russian historian explained:
See this gate? . . . Well, every night trucks stacked with bodies
came back here and dumped them in a heap. They'd already been shot in the back
of the head – you bleed less that way . . . They stacked the bodies in old
wooden ammunition crates.
The workers stoked up the underground ovens – right in through the
doors – to about twelve thousand degrees centigrade. To make things nice and
official they even had professional witnesses who counter-signed the various
documents.
When the bodies were burned they were reduced to ash and some chips
of bone, maybe some teeth. They then buried the ashes in a pit . . . When the
purges [of the 1930s] were at their peak . . . the furnaces worked all night
and the domes of the churches were covered with ash. There was a fine dust of
ash on the snow.
The Kalitnikovsky Cemetery in Moscow also served as dumping
ground for thousands of tortured and executed bodies in the 1930s. That same
Russian historian told David Remnick:
In the purges, every dog in town came to this place. That smell you
smell now was three times as bad; blood was in the air. People would lean out
of their windows and puke all night and the dogs howled until dawn. Sometimes
they'd find a dog with an arm or a leg walking through the graveyard.
Enemies of Socialism Sent to Torture in the Mental Ward
The nightmare of the socialist experiment, however, did not
end with Stalin's death in 1953. Its form merely changed in later decades. As
head of the KGB in the 1970s, Yuri Andropov (who later was General Secretary of
the Communist Party of the Soviet Union after Leonid Brezhnev's death in 1982)
accepted a new theory in Soviet psychiatry that said that opposition to the
socialist regime was a sign of mental illness.
Why? Because only the mentally disturbed would resist the
logic and the truth of Marxian dialectical determinism and its
"proof" that socialism and communism were the highest and most humane
stage of social development. Those who criticized the system or who wanted to
reform or overthrow the Soviet socialist regime were mentally sick and required
psychiatric treatment.
In his book, Russia and the Russians (1984),
former Moscow correspondent for the Washington Post Kevin
Klose told the story of Alexei Nikitin, a coal mine worker who complained to
the Soviet government about the safety and health environment in the mines of
the Soviet Union. He was arrested, tried and found guilty of subversion and
committed to a Soviet mental institution.
Various drugs were proscribed as treatment to bring him to
his proper socialist senses. Explained Kevin Klose:
Of all the drugs administered [at the mental institution] to impose
discipline, sulfazine stood at the pinnacle of pain . . . "People injected
with sulfazine were groaning, sighing with pain, cursing the psychiatrists and
Soviet power, cursing with everything in their hearts," Alexei told us.
"The people go into horrible convulsions and get completely disoriented.
The body temperature rises to 40 degrees centigrade [104 degrees Fahrenheit]
almost instantly, and the pain is so intense they cannot move from their beds
for three days. Sulfazine is simply a way to destroy a man completely. If they
torture you and break your arms, there is a certain specific pain and you
somehow can stand it. But sulfazine is like a drill boring into your body that
gets worse and worse until it's more than you can stand. It's impossible to
endure. It is worse than torture, because, sometimes, torture may end. But this
kind of torture can continue for years."
Sulfazine normally was "prescribed" in a
"course" of injections of increasing strength over a period that
might last up to two months . . . The doctors had many other drugs with which
to control and punish. Most of them eventually were used on Alexei . . . At the
end of two months, Nikitin was taken off sulfazine but regular doses of . . .
other disorienting drugs continued the entire time he was imprisoned.
The significance of these accounts is not their uniqueness
but, rather, their monotonous repetition in every country in which socialism
was imposed upon a society. In country after country, death, destruction and
privation followed in the wake of socialism's triumph. Socialism's history is
an unending story of crushing tyranny and oceans of blood.
Socialism as the Ideology of Death and Destruction
As the Soviet mathematician and dissident Igor Shafarevich,
who spent many years in the GULAG slave labor camps for his opposition to the
communist regime, said in his book, The Socialist Phenomenon (1980):
Most socialist doctrines and movements are literally saturated with
the mood of death, catastrophe, and destruction . . . One could regard the
death of mankind as the final result to which the development of socialism
leads.
That twentieth century socialism would lead to nothing but
this outcome was understood at the time of the Bolshevik victory in
Russia. It was clearly expressed by the greatest intellectual opponent of
socialism during the last one hundred years, the Austrian economist, Ludwig
von Mises.
Near the end of his famous 1922 treatise, Socialism:
An Economic and Sociological Analysis, Mises warned that:
Socialism is not in the least what is pretends to be. It is not the
pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years
of civilization have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction
is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the social
order based on private ownership in the means of production has created . . .
Each step leading towards Socialism must exhaust itself in the destruction of
what already exists.
When voices are raised today calling for socialism in America,
including by those attempting to win a major party candidacy to run for the
presidency of the United States, it is important – no, it is crucial – that the
history and reality of socialism-in-practice in those parts of the world in
which it was most thoroughly imposed and implemented be remembered and fully
understood. If we do not, well, history has its own ways of repeating itself.
Dr. Richard Ebeling is the BB&T
Distinguished Professor of Ethics and Free Enterprise Leadership at The Citadel
in Charleston, South Carolina. He was professor of economics at Northwood
University in Midland, Michigan (2009-2014). He served as president of the
Foundation for Economic Education (2003-2008) and held the Ludwig von Mises
Chair in Economics at Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, Michigan (1988-2003).
