Obama: Order and Progress Can Only Come When Individuals Surrender Their Rights to an All-Powerful Sovereign

Obama: Order and Progress Can Only Come When Individuals Surrender Their Rights to an All-Powerful Sovereign By Tim Brown            

 [The following is a response to an earlier Tim Brown article.  Notice how crystal clear his analysis is on the subject]

In addressing various dignitaries and members of the NATO alliance back in March of this year, Barack Obama gave a speech, in which he used some phrases that some have taken out of context. Yet, if one listens to what Obama says following those statements and looks at what he advances policy-wise, one cannot help but understand that he is speaking out of both sides of his mouth. What is the phrase in question you might ask? Obama told the audience, "Order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign."  Before I move on, let me make you aware that at Freedom Outpost, we carried this very statement in an article by a Vietnam Veteran friend of mine by the name of Leon Puissegur. As soon as it was published, it was clear that people, who claim to be conservatives, didn't even read the article, but wanted to pontificate on use taking the statement out of context in the title. First, how do you take a statement out of context when it's merely a title? You can't. Sometimes you use sarcasm in a title and still people don't get it. I ended up writing this brief editor's note at the beginning just a couple of hours after posting because people wouldn't read the article.

Editor's Note: I've decided to put this at the top since many people simply read a title and never read the content of articles. Then they pontificate about the article's content as though they read it or even watched the video if supplied. If you don't read the content of the article, then you have no authority to comment on it. I find this incredibly ironic considering many conservatives are so upset their representatives don't read legislation before voting on it. I added the full video before publishing Leon's article, so that you can view it all the way through. These are his words and there is a context. Leon also made sure to point out exactly what context Barack Obama said this in. However, his point was to demonstrate that Obama's actions speak a lot louder than his words, words Obama claims he disagrees with. Yet, given his actions, it appears Obama is in clear agreement with what his mouth claims he is against. I even had one self-professed conservative write me via email, after I provided him the actual text where we pointed out the context, to tell me, "You can't expect people to read your articles." Talk about dumbing down!

Consider Obama's words in their context just moments into his speech. He spoke about how things were viewed in the past, claiming such things as, "Ordinary men and women are too small minded to govern their own affairs."

In discussing theories of the past about government, he declared, "Order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereignty." Many people blew this off as being out of context, yet the article clearly cited what the context was and then ventured on to point out the fact that Barack Obama is advancing a New World Order, one in which the very thing he talks about despising is really where he wants the world to go.  In other words, Barack Obama has been clear about men and women not being able to govern their own affairs. How can I say that? Just look at how he has opened up the welfare state, turning back the welfare reform signed into law by Bill Clinton. Take a look at his unconstitutional "law" that bears his own name, Obamacare. That was put into place because he and other socialists and communists like him do not think people can manage their healthcare affairs. His push for the raising of the minimum wage is another example of how he thinks individuals can't govern their own affairs. These are just a couple of examples. I could list many, many more and have written on dozens of them.

So, what of this claim about giving up rights to an all-powerful sovereign? Surely Obama doesn't believe in that, does he?

Consider that my veteran friend Leon conducted the only interview with Dr. John Drew, who attended Occidental College with Barack Obama. As they studied Marxism together and talked, it became clear that Obama wanted to pursue turning the United States into a Marxist country via a communist style revolution. While Dr. Drew was later converted to the Lord Jesus Christ, Barack Obama remained a committed Marxist, despite his claims of being a Christian, which his 2004 interview demonstrates.

When Leon asked Dr. Drew if Obama displayed the Marxist ideology in college, Drew responded, "We were confiding in each other the way people fight with each other people with major historical struggles in communicating, very down to earth, very honest. Like I said, I am ashamed of my Socialist/Marxist past, I have a conversion story which explains how I became a Christian, Constitutional Conservative. Barack Obama has no conversion story. There is a story about how he stopped being a Marxist, if anything his career, life shows an alarming consistency in his ideological extremism."

When he was then asked if he saw that same Marxist ideology in Obama today, Drew said, "Yes, especially when he talks about the people holding on to their guns and religion because of economic stress. That is a Marxist idea. Everything he says about it being a good idea to spread the wealth around; that is Marxist/Socialist concepts. Some of the statements Obama makes about things inevitably get better, I think that is a Marxist ideological remnants."

He then went on to say that revolutions like Obama wanted in the US, communist style revolutions, only occur in "backwards raring economies." Drew then added that he thinks Obama "believed that the economic stresses would pile up worse and worse and after the stresses built up they would just build up to a breaking point where a new group would take over the country. That would be a large group of workers, students, young people, those who were enlightened by Marxist/Socialist ideology would end up running things." Does that sound like Cloward and Piven friends?

With that in mind, understand that Obama does have a particular mindset and it is not one that wishes the best for America. It is to bring her to her knees so that individuals will surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign who is not the Lord Jesus Christ.

This should be apparent in the way this administration has gone after guns with a vengeance and got their hands slapped on nearly every occasion they attempted to put them in the cookie jar. They have virtually ignored every one of the first Ten Amendments in the Bill of Rights.

Now come back to this presentation. If you follow Obama's words all the way through, you will hear him espouse certain things that sound good, but they are always tied up in the "international community." While Obama says that the West doesn't claim to be the "arbiters of right and wrong," he does claim there are "international norms." The question is, who determines those norms? Who enforces those norms? Is it the norm to exercise free speech? It is the norm for international citizens to be armed against tyranny? More to the point, is it the norm for governments to not be transparent to their people or to treat them as peasants? If the latter, then isn't that pretty much doing the very thing that Obama says he is against?

Remember, this man is a master liar and deceiver, and yes, it's documented. His birth certificate and Social Security number is all you really need to know to understand. In fact, if those weren't enough, surely the information that the US Department of Homeland Security could not verify that he is legally able to hold a job flipping hamburgers at the local McDonald's.

In the end, he is continuing to advance the New World Order, just as his predecessors were. My friends, while Obama is saying one thing with his mouth, his actions are saying something completely different. Watch the entire video and see how much this man is pushing for the sovereignty of the United States to be given over to the international community, and once that is done, how long do you think it will be before your individual rights suffer the same fate?