In pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free
markets and individual liberty
Information you can use
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"[T]he crisis is arrived when we must assert our rights, or submit to every imposition, that can be heaped upon us, till custom and use shall make us as tame and abject slaves." --George Washington (1774)
~~~~~~
Surprise! Jobless Claims Up 78,000 Week After Election; PA, OH Worst Hit
The Department of Labor has announced that new jobless claims rose by a
staggering 78,000 in the first week after the election, reaching a
seasonally-adjusted total of 439,000. Over the past year, and in the weeks
leading up to the election, jobless claims were said to be declining, dipping
as low as 339,000, with the media proclaiming that they had reached the
"lowest level in more than four years." Now, suddenly, the news seems
far less rosy. From the Department of Labor press release this morning:
In the week ending November 10, the advance figure
for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 439,000, an increase of 78,000 from
the previous week's revised figure of 361,000. The 4-week moving average was
383,750, an increase of 11,750 from the previous week's revised average of
372,000. Some of the new claims, especially in New Jersey, were due to
Hurricane Sandy--but these were offset by a decline in claims filed in New
York. The highest numbers of new filings came from Pennsylvania and Ohio,
where there were thousands of layoffs in the construction, manufacturing,
and automobile industries. Both states had been targeted by the
presidential campaigns. President Obama highlighted his record of job
creation in Ohio in particular, focusing on the automobile industry. The
state reported 6,450 new jobless claims in the week after the
election--second-highest after Pennsylvania, which recorded 7,766 new claims.
~~~~~~
Medicare in lame
duck Congress's cross-hairs
Election polling
found women disproportionately concerned with what happens to Medicare, which is expected to be a major topic when the
lame duck Congress meets Nov. 14. When
the lame duck Congress meets today, Nov. 14, Medicare--the old age public
health program upon which women disproportionately depend--is expected to be in
the cross-hairs. "Medicare will be front and center in the
debate," predicted Susan Carroll, senior scholar at the Center for
American Women and Politics at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey in
New Brunswick. "House Republicans don't view the Democrats' victories
as a reason to retreat from their long-term position that any debt deal
includes steep savings drawn from reforming all entitlements, including Medicare."
Three female members of the House, all Democrats, are leaping to defend
Medicare during the lame duck session.
~~~~~~
Sebelius Subpoenaed
in House Obamacare Investigation
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has been subpoenaed
by the House Ways and Means Committee in its investigation of how the White
House is enacting Obamacare. Under the subpoena, Sebelius must provide
documents and information on how taxpayer money has been spent on promoting the
law from January 2008 to Wednesday, Politico reports. The investigation covers
the department’s public relations, advertising, and message-testing efforts
regarding Obamacare. The department has signed at least two contracts, one
valued at $20 million, for public relations services, Politico reports.
~~~~~~
The secession
petitions
The county-by-county election
maps clearly revealed the geographical delineation between the Left-leaning
urban centers and the Right-leaning rest of the nation. Naturally, I observed
that this delineation formed reasonable lines for secession, and I recalled
these words from Tennessean Nathan Bedford Forrest on the Second War for
Independence (as it was known in the South): "I loved the old government.
I loved the old Constitution. I do not hate it; I am opposing now only the
radical revolutionists who are trying to destroy it." Succession is not believable, but can only
serve as ventilation of a strong conservative movement opposed to the
Administrations sharp turn to the left.
~~~~~~
42% See Need for
Big Cuts in Defense, Entitlements to Reduce Deficit, 31% Don’t
Voters still tend to think defense spending and entitlement programs need
to go on the chopping block to reduce the record federal deficit, but they’re
not overly confident that President Obama and Congress will reach a long-term
agreement to make those cuts. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey
finds that 42% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it is necessary to significantly
reduce the cost of entitlement programs and military spending to reduce the
long-term federal deficit. But 31% disagree and don’t see a need for major cuts
in these areas.
~~~~~~
Authoritarianism
vs. Liberty by Ron Paul
If authoritarianism
leads to poverty and war and less freedom for all individuals and is controlled
by rich special interests, the people should be begging for liberty. There certainly was a strong enough sentiment for
more freedom at the time of our founding that motivated those who were willing
to fight in the revolution against the powerful British government. During
my time in Congress the appetite for liberty has been quite weak; the
understanding of its significance negligible. Yet the good news is that
compared to 1976 when I first came to Congress, the desire for more freedom
and less government in 2012 is much greater and growing, especially in
grassroots America. Tens of thousands of teenagers and college age
students are, with great enthusiasm, welcoming the message of liberty. I
have a few thoughts as to why the people of a country like ours, once the
freest and most prosperous, allowed the conditions to deteriorate to the
degree that they have. Read
the full article here...
~~~~~~
Petraeus: Echoes of
King David? by
Daniel Burke
It’s tempting to view the sex scandal surrounding retired Army Gen. David
Petraeus through a religious lens. After all, most faiths forbid adultery, and
even before his fall from grace, some Pentagon colleagues compared Petraeus to
the biblical King David — another proud and powerful warrior. The comparison
seemed even more apt after the former four-star general’s resignation from the
CIA on Friday. “More than one officer cited the biblical adultery of King David
and Bathsheba,” wrote The New York Times. The Bible says that David acted
righteously and kept God’s commandments – except in the case of
Uriah the Hittite, Bathsheba’s husband. “Will history remember David Petraeus
with the same caveat?” asked Jim Denison, a Southern Baptist scholar in Dallas.
~~~~~
Arab world condemns
Israel
CAIRO, Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Egypt, Syria, Iran, Qatar and Turkey were among
the countries Thursday that quickly condemned Israel's military offensive in
Gaza. The Muslim Brotherhood called on Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi to
sever ties with Israel and called for Egyptians to participate in protests
across the country Thursday and following Friday prayers, Ahram Online
reported. A statement released by the Muslim Brotherhood said the Egyptian
government "cannot stand less than cutting all relations with the Zionist
entity, since the Egyptian state needs to stand as a role model to Arabs and
Muslims." Israel's "criminal aggressions" threatens regional
stability, the statement said.
~~~~~~
Five porn sites
among Top 100 in Egypt - Muslim Hypocrisy?
CAIRO, Nov. 14 (UPI) -- A company tracking online traffic patterns said
Egypt's 100 most-frequently visited websites include five porn sites. Alexa, a
division of Amazon.com, released the list amid an order last week by Egypt's
prosecutor general for the ministries of telecommunications, interior and
information to begin enforcing a ban on Internet pornography, al-Arabiya
reported Wednesday. The company said the porn sites rank at numbers 15, 23, 29,
67 and 83 on the list of the 100 most visited sites in the country. Meanwhile,
Alexa revealed seven porn sites appear in the Top 100 in Tunisia and five sites
appear on the list for Lebanon.
~~~~~~
Krauthammer: White
House May Have Used Petraeus Affair to Influence Benghazi Testimony
Government officials may have used former CIA director David Petraeus’
affair with Paula Broadwell as a bargaining chip to influence what he told
Congress about the September 11th attack of the U.S. Embassy in Libya,
Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer says “Here’s a man who knows
the administration holds his fate in his hands,’’ Krauthammer told Fox
News’ “Special Report’’ on Tuesday night. “And he gives testimony completely at
variance with what the secretary of defense had said the day before, at
variance with what he heard from the station chief in Tripoli, and with
everything that we had heard. “Was he influenced by the fact he knew his fate
was held by people in the administration at that time?” Krauthammer said he
found it “shocking’’ Petraeus “thought and hoped he could keep his job. “He thought that it might and would be
kept secret, and then he could stay in his position. I think what that
tells us is really important. “It meant that he understood that the FBI
obviously knew what was going on. He was hoping that those administration
officials would not disclose what had happen and therefore hoping that he would
keep his job. “And that meant that he understood that his job, his
reputation, his legacy, his whole celebrated life was in the hands of the
administration. And he expected they would protect him by keeping it quiet.” Petraeus
reportedly told congressional intelligence leaders days after the attack that
he believed it was spontaneous. “That brings us to the ultimate issue, and that
is his testimony on Sept. 13,” Krauthammer said. “That’s the thing that
connects the two scandals. And that’s the only thing that makes the sex scandal
relevant. Otherwise it would be exercise in sensationalism and voyeurism,
and nothing else.’’
~~~~~~
Irrefutable Data:
Global Warming Stopped in 1997 Written by Gary
North
The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new
data released last week. The figures, which have triggered debate among
climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012,
there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures. This means
that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the
same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before
that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years. The new
figures mean that the pause in global warming has now lasted for about the same
time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. . . . The new
figures mean that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the
same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. The new
data, compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea, was
issued quietly on the internet, without any media fanfare, and, until
today, it has not been reported. This stands in sharp contrast to the
release of the previous figures six months ago, which went only to the
end of 2010 – a very warm year. Ending the data then means it is possible to
show a slight warming trend since 1997, but 2011 and the first eight months of
2012 were much cooler, and thus this trend is erased. . . . From the start of
1997 until August 2012, however, figures released last week show the answer is
zero: the trend, derived from the aggregate data collected from more than 3,000
worldwide measuring points, has been flat. Not that there has been
any coverage in the media, which usually reports climate issues
assiduously, since the figures were quietly release online with no accompanying
press release – unlike six months ago when they showed a slight warming trend..
. . But according to increasing numbers of serious climate scientists, it
does suggest that the computer models that have for years been predicting
imminent doom, such as those used by the Met Office and the UN
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are flawed, and that the climate is
far more complex than the models assert.
Full
Article Here
This is not a Red state or Blue state issue. It is an issue of election integrity that reflects the will of the people
22 Signs That Voter
Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham - Sad day for
America
The following are 22 signs that voter fraud is wildly out of control and
the election was a sham…
#1 According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters across the
United States reported more than 70,000
voting problems by 5 PM Eastern time on election day.
#2 There were 59 voting divisions in the city
of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. In those
voting divisions, the combined vote total was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for
Mitt Romney.
#3 The overall voter turnout rate in Philadelphia was only about 60 percent. But in the
areas of Philadelphia where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter
turnout rate was over 90% and Obama received over 99% of the vote. Officials in
Philadelphia have already ruled out an
investigation.
#4 According to WND, one poll watcher in Pennsylvania actually
claims that he witnessed voting machine software repeatedly switch votes from
Mitt Romney to Barack Obama…
It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor,
Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election
Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to
default – to Obama.”
#5 Somehow Mitt Romney won 55
out of the 67 counties in the state of Pennsylvania and still managed to
lose the entire state by a wide margin because of the absurd vote totals that
Obama ran up in the urban areas.
#6 Barack Obama received more than 98 percent
of the vote in 10 out of the 50 wards in the city of Chicago.
#7 Prior to the election, voters in the states of Nevada, North
Carolina, Texas and Ohio all reported that voting machines were switching
their votes for Romney over to Obama.
#8 There were more than 50 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Mitt
Romney received 2 votes or less.
#9 There were more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where
Barack Obama received more than 99 times the votes that Mitt
Romney did.
#10 Barack Obama also received more than 99% of the vote
in a number of very important precincts down in Broward County, Florida.
#11 Wood County, Ohio (which Obama won) has a voting age population of 98,213, but somehow 106,258 voters were registered to vote on
election day.
#12 Ten counties in the swing state of Colorado have a voter registration
rate of more than 100%.
#13 Barack Obama did not win in a single state that absolutely
requires a photo I.D. in order to vote.
#14 In Ohio, two election judges were caught allowing unregistered
voters to cast ballots.
#15 Many Ohio voters that showed up at the polls on election day were
surprised when they were informed that they had already voted.
#16 In fact, there were reports all over the nation of people
being unable to vote because records showed that they had already voted.
#17 According to U.S. Representative Allen West, there were numerous “voting irregularities” in St.
Lucie County, Florida on election day…
“The thing that spurred our curiosity in our race
was the fact that at 1 o’clock in the morning on Election Night, all of a
sudden there was a 4,000-vote swing that took me from being ahead to put the
lead into my opponent’s hands.”
#18 In Wisconsin, there were allegations that Obama voters were actually
being bussed in from out of state…
The Democrats stationed a self described “BIG
Chicago pro bono attorney” as one of their two observers at this small polling
place. He remained at the polling place from 7:00 a.m. until well after 8:p.m.
…..A high priced CHICAGO attorney, sitting in a Sheboygan WISCONSIN polling
place, observing wards comprised of 1500 voters? …. WHY???
Why would someone from Chicago be observing in Sheboygan Wisconsin? And WHY at such a small polling place? Finally, isn’t it interesting that this would occur at the VERY polling place in which all of the above described events ALSO occurred? AGAIN WHY WOULD A CHICAGO ATTORNEY BE OBSERVING AN ELECTION POLLING PLACE WITH FEWER THAN 1500 VOTERS IN IT, IN SHEBOYGAN WISCONSIN? Of all the places where there has been suspected voting irregularities, and OUTRIGHT FRAUD throughout the ENTIRE United States, WHY HERE? WHY SHEBOYGAN? WHY THIS SMALL WARD? This lawyer spent the day running in and out making, and taking calls, which coincidentally then coincided with influxes of groups of individuals by the van and bus loads, coming in to register, AND VOTE, using what appeared to be copied Allient energy bills. These individuals often did not have photo I.D.’s, could not remember their own addresses without looking at the paper, and became easily tripped, confused and annoyed when questioned. Many of these same individuals, just so happened to be dressed in/wearing CHICAGO BEARS apparel, and whom openly discussed “catching busses back to Chicago” with each other, with poll workers, via their cell phones in the lobby area just outside the polling place, as well as in the parking lot, both before and AFTER registering and voting. One woman was dressed head to toe in CHICAGO BEARS apparel including perfectly manicured BEARS fake fingernails! She complained because registering was taking too long and she had to hurry up to catch her bus back to Chicago. We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from different states, photos of them leaving the polls, and other irregularities.
Why would someone from Chicago be observing in Sheboygan Wisconsin? And WHY at such a small polling place? Finally, isn’t it interesting that this would occur at the VERY polling place in which all of the above described events ALSO occurred? AGAIN WHY WOULD A CHICAGO ATTORNEY BE OBSERVING AN ELECTION POLLING PLACE WITH FEWER THAN 1500 VOTERS IN IT, IN SHEBOYGAN WISCONSIN? Of all the places where there has been suspected voting irregularities, and OUTRIGHT FRAUD throughout the ENTIRE United States, WHY HERE? WHY SHEBOYGAN? WHY THIS SMALL WARD? This lawyer spent the day running in and out making, and taking calls, which coincidentally then coincided with influxes of groups of individuals by the van and bus loads, coming in to register, AND VOTE, using what appeared to be copied Allient energy bills. These individuals often did not have photo I.D.’s, could not remember their own addresses without looking at the paper, and became easily tripped, confused and annoyed when questioned. Many of these same individuals, just so happened to be dressed in/wearing CHICAGO BEARS apparel, and whom openly discussed “catching busses back to Chicago” with each other, with poll workers, via their cell phones in the lobby area just outside the polling place, as well as in the parking lot, both before and AFTER registering and voting. One woman was dressed head to toe in CHICAGO BEARS apparel including perfectly manicured BEARS fake fingernails! She complained because registering was taking too long and she had to hurry up to catch her bus back to Chicago. We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from different states, photos of them leaving the polls, and other irregularities.
#19 Prior to election day, an Obama for America staffer was caught on video trying to
help someone register to vote in more than one state.
#20 It is being alleged that unions in Nevada have been registering illegal
immigrants and pressuring them to vote.
#21 According to townhall.com, there was a systematic
effort by the Obama campaign to suppress the military vote because they knew
that most military votes would go against Obama…
Aiding Obama’s win was a devious suppression of the
conservative vote. The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since 2010 due to the
so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year
before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain
absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in
requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas
military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer
overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering
Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.
#22 According to the Naval Enlisted Reserve Association, it appears that
thousands of military votes from this election will never be counted at
all.
So what do you
think about all of this? Do you still
believe that elections in America are fair and honest? Better yet, what
will you do?
No comments:
Post a Comment