The ObamaNation Plantation Calling Out Obama's Socialist Political Agenda
"Repeal that [welfare] law, and you will soon see a
change in their manners. [I]ndustry will increase, and with it plenty among the
lower people; their circumstances will mend, and more will be done for their happiness
by inuring them to provide for themselves, than could be done by dividing all
your estates among them." --Benjamin Franklin (1753)
Barack Hussein Obama's Leftmedia sycophants
declared the Romney-Ryan
presidential ticket DOA this week. The talkingheads have convicted Mitt Romney
for what they insist is a very offensive "political gaffe" uttered at
a private campaign event back in May.
The colossal blunder in question? Romney identified the underbelly of
Obama's socialist political agenda -- the fact that an
ever-increasing number of "useful idiots" have been lured into
subservience by generations of Socialist Democrat policies, are now dependent on a
laundry list of government subsidies, and, consequently, they are very likely to vote for the candidate who will
continue redistributing wealth to fund those subsidies.The video was surreptitiously recorded by an anonymous party, then leaked by an opposition researcher named James Carter IV -- yes, he's the grandson of that Jimmy Carter -- to a hard-left magazine, which timed its release of the video as part of Obama's dezinformatsia campaign. In the video, Romney said, "There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president, no matter what ... who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That's an entitlement, and the government should give it to them. And they will vote for [Obama] no matter what. ... These are people who pay no income tax."
While Romney's citation of the percentage of Americans who pay no taxes was correct, and it happens to coincide with Obama's current poll numbers, clearly his reference was to the fact that 30-35 percent of Obama's most fervent constituent support is composed of those who are now culturally, if not irrevocably, dependent upon a plethora of government subsidies. These "takers" pay no income tax, and they thus have no direct liability in the economics of wealth redistribution and no stake in curtailing our calamitous $16,000,000,000,000 national debt. Avowed socialist George Bernard Shaw, co-founder of the London School of Economics, smugly declared at the turn of the 20th century, "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." [just to be sure, you are Peter!]
~~~~~~
America's Big
Choice By Ben Shapiro
What
happens when a free people decides it was never free to begin with? What
happens when a nation decides that individual liberty is a myth, that the
endless vicissitudes of life form an impenetrable wall to success, that we are
all controlled by outside forces? We despair. We turn to the power of the
masses. This is where almost half
of America currently stands. It came out this week that Mitt Romney made
this claim back in May, and he was exactly right. That doesn't mean that every
American who doesn't pay federal income tax -- veterans, recipients of Social
Security -- has given up the American dream. But it does mean that the vast
majority of Americans who, on net, receive government benefits and beg
government for more, have given up on that dream. And while President Obama cynically claims
that his supporters aren't victims, his entire campaign has been based on
turning them into victims -- victims of Wall Street, of luck, of chance, of
fate. Were they not victims, they would not need an all-powerful government to
rectify their victimhood. So we must
decide. Are we a nation of victims? Or are we a nation of free men and
women, striving against all odds to succeed thanks to our initiative? Are we
only powerful when made part of that great collective, or are we more powerful
when we pursue our individual aspirations with the gusto of the dreamers? This election isn't about hope and change.
It's about hope versus change. More specifically, it's about individual hope
versus collectivist change. And the outcome is very much in doubt.
~~~~~~
Cult
of Obama: See Narcissism UnprecedentedPresident Barack Obama took the Cult of Obama and narcissism to perhaps an unprecedented level on Wednesday when his campaign began selling posters that desecrated the image of the American flag by replacing the stars on the flag with the “O” symbol that serves as the Obama campaign’s logo. A tweet linked to Obama’s campaign store, where people could purchase a limited edition “OUR STRIPES: FLAG PRINT” poster for $35. Ross Bruggink and Dan Olson of Studio MPLS designed the screen print and, according to the website, there are 250 posters for sale. Another poster, also for sale for $35, is a map of the United States depicting the flag, with the Obama campaign logo again replacing the stars.
~~~~~~
64% Think Too Many
Americans Dependent on Government Financial Aid - Rasmussen
Americans
strongly believe that there is too much government dependency in the country
today. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 64% of
Adults think there are too many Americans dependent on the government for
financial aid. Just 10% think not enough Americans are dependent on the
government, while 16% say the level of dependency is about right.
~~~~~~
Report: Never an Anti-American Protest in
Benghazi, Only a Planned Attack
CBS reports this
morning that witnesses are saying "that there was never an
anti-American protest outside of the consulate [in Benghazi, Libya].
Instead, they say, it came under planned attack. That is in direct
contradiction to the administration's account of the incident."
"What's clear," the CBS reporter concludes, "is that the
public won't get a detailed account of what happened until after the
election."
~~~~~~
Obama Unemployment Rate Above 8% Longer
Than Any Other President Since 1948
Excluding January
2009, the month when Barack Obama was inaugurated, unemployment has stayed
above 8 percent, which is longer than under any other administration since the
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)started measuring the monthly jobless rate:
Over 8 percent for 43 months during Obama compared to a total of 39 months
above 8 percent between 1948 and 2008. Over the course of 50 years, the
unemployment rate in the United States was above 8 percent for a total of 3
years and 3 months; under Obama alone, the rate has been above 8 percent for
3 years and 7 months.
~~~~~~
Values and Moral Truth are Not the Same By Albert Mohler
No discussion of our national ills
is complete without some mention of slippery “values” in the public square.
Indeed, though talk of moral absolutes is portrayed as outdated and simplistic,
the debate concerning national values has never been more heated. The late Allan Bloom, whose 1987 book The
Closing of the American Mind became a runaway bestseller, wrote
perceptively that the contemporary talk of “values” is what is left when
society accepts the notion that there is no genuine right or wrong. Moral issues are reduced to matters of
personal preference and conviction. My “values” may not match your “values,”
but we all must respect each other’s convictions equally in matters of common
concern. The situation prompted one observer to comment that when he hears
talk of “values,” he reaches for his nearest discount catalogue. It is about as
useful as anything else if all moral absolutes are discarded. The postmodern philosophers have undermined
the very concept of morality, arguing that all moral systems are merely relics
of the repressive past, put in place by oppressive forces. Since all
truth–including moral claims–is socially constructed, postmodern humans are
free to “deconstruct” these moral codes and find “values” within. That generation of young people is now well
into adulthood, and we can see the moral damage inflicted by those who
instructed students to look only within themselves for a system of values, and
to doubt or defy traditional morality. Values
reflect only a subjective dimension with no objective moral truth. A generation
raised in the incubator of moral relativism is groping for enduring truth in
the moral wilderness.
~~~~~~
Obama is Living Large while Americans Suffer
Who do you think
costs more to support every year: the Queen of England or Barack Obama?
If you guessed the Queen you are wrong by around $1,942,000,000. The
citizens of Great Britain pony up approximately $58 million annually to support
the Queen, a mere pittance compared to the $2 billion Americans spend
supporting Barack Obama and his extravagant lifestyle. Presidential perks
and budgets have been increasing steadily over the years, but no president has
spent more on himself and his office than Barack Obama, and he has done this at
a time when 23 million Americans are unemployed and America is carrying a $16
trillion debt. Apparently President Obama thinks leadership means living large
while Americans suffer.
~~~~~~
Obama’s Foreign Policy Approval Rating Drops
After Mideast Turmoil By Patrick
Goodenough
(CNSNews.com) – The
first opinion poll to be conducted after last week’s deadly attack on a U.S.
consulate in Libya and a spate of anti-American protests across the Muslim
world has recorded a five-point drop in approval for President Obama’s handling
of foreign policy. The NBC/Wall
Street Journal poll released Tuesday found the president’s foreign policy approval
among registered voters at 49 percent, down from 54 percent one month
earlier. “The fall was steeper among
independents, going from 53 percent in August to 41 percent,” NBC reported.
~~~~~~
Become active - energize
your family and friends to engage in the election of our lifetime!
No comments:
Post a Comment