Police convictions prove
elusive
By CAMERON KNIGHT
Two shootings, two dead
black men, two white officers charged with murder, and in the past month two
mistrials resulting from hung juries.
On Monday, after
deliberating 22 hours over four days, a jury of 11 white people and one black
person declared they were hopelessly deadlocked in the trial of former North
Charleston, South Carolina, Police Officer Michael Slager, who shot and killed
Walter Scott.
That came just three weeks
after a Hamilton County jury reached a similar impasse after 25 hours of
deliberation over four days in the trial of former University of Cincinnati
police officer Ray Tensing. That jury, with two black members, could not reach
a unanimous verdict. Tensing is free on bond awaiting retrial.
To Philip Stinson, an
associate professor of criminology at Bowling Green State University, the cases
verify what his research has shown: It’s extremely unlikely for an officer to
be convicted of murder or manslaughter.
“Jurors do not like to
believe that a police officer could be a murderer,” Stinson said. “When you
have these on-duty violent encounters, they just are not willing to
second-guess the split-second life or death decisions that officers make.”
In the last decade, he
said only one police officer in the nation has been convicted of murder in
on-duty fatal shootings of civilians.
“If there was any case
where a prosecutor would be able to get a conviction, you would think it was
this case,” Stinson said of the South Carolina case. “The video evidence was
damning. We saw a police officer execute a man who was running away from him
... then the officer’s first thought was to plant evidence.”
Donyetta Bailey, president
of the Black Lawyers Association of Cincinnati, said the latest mistrial
reveals racial bias in juries.
“I feel like the Walter
Scott situation is more clear cut,” Bailey said, referring to the man Officer
Slager shot and killed in North Charleston. “For me, in a situation like that,
I can’t fathom anything other than race or their belief that cops can do no
wrong under any circumstances.”
Bailey also worried the
result of the Slager case might also mean Prosecutor Joe Deters request for a
change of venue in the Tensing case might be useless. That trial could take
place in either the Columbus or Cleveland areas if a judge grants the request.
“It makes you wonder is
there any place where we can go where this case can be tried fairly, where
people leave bias at the door and just evaluate the case based on the evidence
as opposed to preconceived notions about officers,” Bailey said.
While there are many
similarities between the cases, including the existence of video and the fact
both former officers took the stand in their own defense, there is one major
difference: Slager is also facing federal criminal charges, whereas Tensing
does not.
“That’s the whole purpose
of the federal criminal deprivation of civil rights statute – to deal with
situations where the state fails to prosecute or fails to successfully
prosecute,” Stinson said. He explained that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in many
jurisdictions has been stepping into cases involving officer-involved shooting
earlier in recent years.
Federal charges against
Tensing have not been ruled out, but Stinson said the standards for bringing
federal civil rights charges are very high. The U.S. Attorney’s Office would
have to be confident that race was a factor in the incident.
“Before the Tensing trial,
I wouldn’t have been sure if that was suitable,” Stinson said. “Now that we
know he was wearing a Confederate flag T-shirt, I don’t know if they are going
to revisit...I don’t know if the Confederate flag is enough.”
No comments:
Post a Comment