Trump is the change America needs
I was rather surprised at the flawed logic The Enquirer
editorial board used to endorse Hillary Clinton. First, they ignored Gary Johnson, the most serious third-party
candidate since Ross Perot. Johnson has none of Clinton’s or Donald Trump’s
flaws and is eminently qualified to be president. Second, and more important, The Enquirer failed to look beyond the
personalities and often-caustic rhetoric of both major-party candidates to
actually examine issues.
Exhibit A is the
Supreme Court. Some months back, Trump released a list of potential Supreme
Court nominees that by all accounts was well thought out and consisted
of highly qualified people who would respect the Constitution and restrict
their role to its interpretation, rather than legislating from the bench. Clinton
has said nothing.
Exhibit B is Clinton’s
tenure as secretary of state, which was anything but “competent.”
During her tenure, Islamic State established itself, Russia’s Vladimir Putin
and North Korea became more belligerent, Americans died needlessly in Benghazi
and Iran moved closer to obtaining nuclear weapons. Does anyone really believe our
position in the world was better when Clinton left State than when she arrived?
Exhibit C is Trump’s
economic platform. In contrast to Clinton’s economic plan, which
is little more than a rehash of ideas of the past eight years, his plan is a
thoughtful blueprint for reforming the mess in Washington. If Clinton’s ideas
are so great, then why have the people she claims to be trying to help done so
poorly over the past eight years? President Barack Obama had a filibuster-proof
majority in the Senate for nearly two years, something no Republican has ever
had, yet we ended up with “the rich getting richer and the poor getting
poorer,” along with needless shootings at home and IS threatening much of the
world abroad.
What really struck me about The Enquirer’s editorial
was its use of the term “cowboy diplomacy” to disparage Trump. This is exactly
what most of the mainstream media said in 1980 about Ronald Reagan. Like Trump,
Reagan was deemed unfit and too dangerous. Much of what The Enquirer “fears” about Trump
was also feared about Reagan, and most of these fears proved unfounded during
much of his presidency.
The relevant question is what are the consequences? How many
of Trump’s loony ideas would ever be passed by Congress? Can you
imagine Congress ever approving $10 billion plus to build a wall? But Clinton’s
budget of higher taxes and more job killing and wage suppressing regulations, after
relentless threats from the White House and whining in the media, would
undoubtedly pass in some form. Charles Krauthammer put it best two
months back when he said, “As in 1980, the status-quo candidate for a failed
administration is running against an outsider. The stay the- course candidate
plays his/her only available card – charging that the outsider is dangerously out
of the mainstream and temperamentally unfit to command the nation.”
The biggest question is, as a nation, are we on the right or
wrong track? If you believe we are on the right track and everything is oh so
much better than before, then vote for Clinton and you will get four more years
of the same. But if you think we are on the wrong track, then the last thing you
should want is a candidate who is a product of the current administration and
promises no new ideas.
If we truly want change, we need an outsider who is not a
lifelong politician. Of course, said outsider will be less experienced, but
that is what advisers are for. So yes, hold your nose if you must, as I
will do, but be willing to look beyond personalities to see that this nation
cannot afford four more years of the current administration.
Contrary to many
views, this election is not a popularity contest and we should not vote for the
most likeable candidate, but rather the candidate most likely to affect
meaningful change to a system that almost everyone agrees is corrupt to the
core.
Tom Terwilliger is an Amberley Village, Ohio resident.
No comments:
Post a Comment