Contraceptives reduce child poverty, teen pregnancies and abortions or do they?
One way to reduce childhood poverty is to reduce teen
pregnancies. Research cited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
demonstrate that reducing teen pregnancy is a critical and effective way to
combat child poverty. So, with all the free access to birth control, why do we
continue to have teen pregnancies?
The background
The research shows that teen pregnancy and birth are
significant contributors to high school dropout rates among girls. Only about
50 percent of teen mothers receive a high school diploma by age 22 compared to
about 90 percent of women who had not given birth during adolescence. The children
of teenage mothers are more likely to have lower school achievement and drop out of high school, have more health problems, be incarcerated during
adolescence, give birth as a teen, and face unemployment as a young adult.
Where are the fathers? Not being responsible or accountable.
The CDC has declared teen pregnancy a public health priority
and “winnable battle” that should be attacked using evidence-based teen
pregnancy prevention programs with access to youth-friendly clinical services
including birth control. We do
this while teen pregnancies continue.
It is also good news that teen pregnancies (as well as teen
births and abortions) have steadily decreased, especially since 2008. Even so
they remain unacceptably high.
What is driving the decrease in teen pregnancies?
The respected independent Guttmacher Institute just released
a study that documents the decrease in teen pregnancies to historic lows since
their peak in 1990. The study suggests that increased access to long-acting,
reversible contraceptives like IUD’s and implants (LARC’s) are making a
difference.
The study says about recent declines, “it appears likely
that recent changes in contraceptive use are driving the reduction. There is
evidence that contraceptive practices have improved among older teens. A recent
study found that the proportion of 18- to 19-year-old women, who report using
long-acting reversible contraceptive methods tripled between 2007 and 2009, and
promotion and acceptance of these methods among teens and young adult women has
increased.” A prior analysis found that contraceptives accounted for more than
80 percent of the decline in teen pregnancies while abstinence accounted for
about 14 percent.
The bad news is that the Guttmacher study finds that the rate of
decline in teen pregnancies for teens of color lags behind the decline for
white teens. Why?
Studies in the state of Colorado and the city of St. Louis,
where free or affordable, long-acting reversible contraceptives were made
available to teens show the effectiveness of access to those contraceptives.
The program in Colorado resulted in a reduction by 29 percent in teen births.
In St. Louis, teen births declined to 34 per 1,000 teens versus the national
average of 158.5 per thousand.
The cost to all of us from teen births is significant. In 2010, teen
births cost the U.S. nearly $10 billion in increased public assistance and health
care and income lost to lower educational attainment and reduced earnings among
children born to teen mothers. That is spending that will be reduced when we
reduce child poverty.
While many clinics as
well as Planned Parenthood are providing much needed access to contraceptives
and education which reduce teen pregnancies and combat child poverty, teens
under 17 continue unabated.
Community efforts to fight child poverty that include access
to contraceptives and evidence-based education to reduce teen pregnancies and
the child poverty they cause. However, there is still a missing link. That
is, impressing upon these young people the consequences and accountability of
teen pregnancies. As this narrative explains, teen pregnancy should be a
“winnable battle. However, in addition to contraceptives it comes down to the individual
making right decisions.
It also makes sense that anyone who seeks to reduce the number of
abortions start by driving responsibility and accountability to the individual
level.
No comments:
Post a Comment