Hillary Lied, Four Americans Died
Judicial Watch confirmed Thursday what many Americans
already knew: Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's attempt to blame the
attacks in Benghazi on an "offensive video" was a bald-faced lie. As
the result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State
Department, Judicial Watch obtained a series of critical emails that not only
reveal State Department officials knew immediately
the American compound in Benghazi was under attack but that the attack was
perpetrated by assailants tied to a terrorist group. And despite the infamous exasperated
question from the Democrats' likely presidential nominee, the truth does make a big difference at this
point.
The first email was sent Sept. 11, 2012, at 4:07 p.m. It was
forwarded by former Clinton Special Assistant Maria Sand to Clinton's former
Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Jacob
Sullivan, former Executive Assistant Joseph McManus, and a host of other
Special Assistants in Clinton's office. It read as follows:
"The Regional Security
Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Tripoli reports
approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well.
Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM [Chief of
Mission] personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia
is providing security support."
Another email arrived at 4:38 p.m. It was sent by the former
director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Scott Bultrowicz, who was fired
following the report issued by the Advisory Review Board (ARB) citing
"systematic failures and
leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of
the State Department" responsible for security in Benghazi. That would be
the same ARB that refused to interview Hillary Clinton as part of its
investigation. State Department Foreign Officer Lawrence Randolph forwarded
Mills, Sullivan and McManus the email from Bultrowicz with the subject line
"Attack on Benghazi 90112012":
"DSCC received a phone call from [REDACTED] in Benghazi, Libya
initially stating that 15 armed individuals were attacking the compound and
trying to gain entrance. The Ambassador is present in Benghazi and currently is
barricaded within the compound. There are no injuries at this time and it is
unknown what the intent of the attackers is. At approximately 1600 DSCC
received word from Benghazi that individuals had entered the compound. At 1614
RSO advised the Libyans had set fire to various buildings in the area, possibly
the building that houses the Ambassador [REDACTED] is responding and taking
fire."
At 12:04 a.m. Randolph updated Mills, Sullivan and McManus with
another email with the subject line "FW: Update 3: Benghazi Shelter
Location Also Under Attack":
"I just called Ops and they
said the DS command center is reporting that the compound is under attack
again. I am about to reach out to the DS Command Center."
Contained in that email is a series of equally damning
updates:
4:54 p.m.: "Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S.
Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A
response team is on site to locate COM personnel."
6:06 p.m.: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims
Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU): (SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the
group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and call for an attack on
Embassy Tripoli."
11:57 p.m.: "(SBU) DS Command reports the current shelter
location for COM personnel in Benghazi is under mortar fire. There are reports
of injuries to COM staff."
And finally, at 3:22 a.m., Sept. 12, Senior Watch Officer
Andrew Veprek forwarded an email to numerous State Department officials, later
forwarded to Mills and McManus. The subject line? "Death of Ambassador
Stevens in Benghazi":
"Embassy Tripoli confirms
the death of Ambassador John C. (Chris) Stevens in Benghazi. His body has been
recovered and is at the airport in Benghazi."
Two hours later, McManus forwarded the news of Stevens'
death to the State Department Legislative Affairs office -- with instructions
not to "forward to anyone at this point."
Hillary Clinton's
response? An official statement calling the attack "a response to
inflammatory material posted on the Internet."
As for her other, earlier response, blatantly ignored
by the mainstream media? A 10 p.m. phone call between Clinton and
Obama, completely contradicting the previous assertion by the White House that
Obama made no phone calls the night of the attack. As National Review's Andrew
McCarthy sarcastically asked, "Gee, what do you suppose Obama and Clinton
talked about in that 10 p.m. call?"
The rest of the orchestrated disinformation campaign -- sending
former UN ambassador, current National Security Advisor and reliable
propagandist Susan Rice on network news shows to maintain the despicable lie,
Obama's assertion of same on the David Letterman Show and at the UN, the spending
of $70,000 for a Pakistani ad campaign showing Obama and Clinton denouncing the
anti-Islamic video, and a host of other insults to the public's intelligence --
can
no longer be obscured.
America twice elected
an inveterate liar as commander in chief. And the very same corrupt media that ran
interference for Obama's lies are gearing up to do the same thing for an
equally inveterate liar. And make no mistake: All of Clinton's critics will
be characterized as perpetrating a war on women whenever the subject of her
horrendous track record of prevarication arises -- one that included another
blatant lie about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire.
And that's if those questions arise at all. Here are two separate
Google Searches related to the revelations presented by Judicial Watch. Note
that not a single mainstream media source has even filed a report, much less
made this the kind of headline story, followed by a relentless series of
updates, that would have attended any Republican caught doing exactly the same
thing. An equal amount of calculated disinterest attends the scandalous
conflict of interest surrounding the Clinton Foundation, which received
millions of dollars from foreign governments while Clinton was secretary of
state. Foreign governments and individuals are prohibited from giving money to
a U.S. political candidate. Funneling those contributions through the
Clinton Foundation allows Hillary to skirt such restrictions.
On Benghazi, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton gets it
exactly right: "These emails leave no doubt that Hillary Clinton's closest
advisers knew the truth about the Benghazi attack from almost the moment it
happened. And it is inescapable that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
knowingly lied when she planted the false story about 'inflammatory material
being posted on the Internet.'
The contempt for the public's right to
know is evidenced not only in these documents but also in the fact that we had
to file a lawsuit in federal court to obtain them. The Obama gang's cover-up
continues to unravel, despite its unlawful secrecy and continued slow-rolling
of information. Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon
enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, and every other official in these
emails under oath."
Whether Congress
is up to the job or not, one thing is crystal clear: Hillary Clinton is manifestly unfit to lead
this nation. Her election to the Oval Office would be a continuation of the
lawlessness and lying this nation has endured for the past six years. Judicial
Watch has produced the smoking gun. The voting public ignores it at the
nation's peril.
No comments:
Post a Comment