The Dictatorial President Has Been Hiding Behind Memos
by Mark
Horne
Barack
Obama has tried to avoid executive orders in order to obscure how much of a
dictatorial President he is.
Back in
July, when President Obama was giving a speech in Austin, Texas, he defended
himself from the charge that he was a dictatorial president:
"The truth is, even with all
the actions I’ve taken this year, I’m issuing executive orders at the lowest
rate in more than 100 years. So it’s not clear how it is that Republicans didn’t
seem to mind when President Bush took more executive actions than I did."
With that in
mind, here is a civics quiz that might make it more “clear” to everyone:
Which
of these has the force of law:
- Presidential executive orders
- Presidential memoranda
(Hint:
There is no wrong answer.)
That’s
right, memorandums issued by the President have just as much the force of law
as executive orders.
As USA
Today explains:
Like
executive orders, presidential memoranda don’t require action by Congress. They
have the same force of law as executive orders and often have consequences just
as far-reaching. And some of the most significant actions of the Obama
presidency have come not by executive order but by presidential memoranda.
For example,
Barack Obama recently banned oil companies from exploring Bristol Bay, Alaska,
to find oil and gas. (Thankfully, this probably won’t matter until gas prices
go up. I doubt oil companies want to invest much in oil exploration until their
profit margins increase.) Barack Obama has “used presidential memoranda to make
policy on gun control, immigration and labor regulations.”
What makes
all of this especially important to consider is that Obama’s defenders have
been claiming that he cannot be a dictatorial president because he has issued
fewer executive orders than many other Presidents. Correct, he has been using
Presidential memoranda as a subterfuge.
As the USA
Today story points out,
President
Obama has issued a form of executive action known as the presidential
memorandum more often than any other president in history — using it to take
unilateral action even as he has signed fewer executive orders.
When
these two forms of directives are taken together, Obama is on track to take
more high-level executive actions than any president since Harry Truman battled
the “Do Nothing Congress” almost seven decades ago, according to a USA TODAY
review of presidential documents .
And notice,
that chart is comparing Barack Obama’s six years in office to George W. Bush’s
eight.
USA Today
quotes Harry Reid and Jay Carney both making the same argument that they tell
us that Obama made in Austin last July: that the president has been restrained
because he has used so few executive orders.
It is all a big fraud.
No comments:
Post a Comment