Why People Believe America Is
the 'Greatest Threat to Peace'
By Dennis
Prager - Jewish World Review
Last week the
International Business Times reported:
"In
their annual End of Year poll, researchers for WIN and Gallup International
surveyed more than 66,000 people across 65 nations and found that 24 percent of
all respondents answered that the United States 'is the greatest threat to
peace in the world today.' Pakistan and China fell significantly behind the
United States on the poll, with 8 and 6 percent, respectively. Afghanistan,
Iran, Israel and North Korea all tied for fourth place with 4 percent."
For those of
us who believe the opposite — namely, that the United States is the
world's greatest force for peace (and liberty) — an explanation of this
poll is called for. Here is my
explanation:
Much
of the world's moral compass is broken. The moral north reads south and the
moral south reads north. In a world of such loathsome and barbaric regimes as
North Korea, Iran and Syria; with Chinese nationalism rising to chauvinistic
levels under a communist dictatorship; with Russia under Vladimir Putin seeking
to recreate the Soviet empire and silencing critics, sometimes through murder;
with the totalitarian murderers of the Taliban about to retake much of
Afghanistan; and with Islamic terror producing atrocities almost daily, it is the
United States that is voted the greatest threat to peace.
Not the Chinese regime that still venerates Mao
Zedong, the greatest mass murderer in history; that continues to crush
Tibet, one of the world's most ancient countries and cultures; that
squelches liberty and arrests and tortures dissidents; and that is engaged in a
massive military buildup.
Not Iran, which is
governed by a regime that has repeatedly called for the extermination of
another nation; that tortures and kills dissidents on a daily basis; that is
the greatest supporter of terrorist movements; and that is building a nuclear
weapon.
Not the Taliban, which,
when in power, gave safe haven to Osama bin Laden, the world's most lethal
terrorist; which murders girls who attend school; and which murders aid workers
who inoculate Afghan children against polio.
Not nuclear North Korea,
the world's largest concentration camp, which regularly threatens its
neighbors.
And not Islamic terror
groups, the greatest murderers of innocent people in the world today.
Unfortunately, the poll results are
not surprising.
First, while individual
human beings do enormous good, mankind has always been morally unimpressive. In
terms of moral judgment, we should expect little from the majority of the human
species.
Second, the world's news media are
responsible for this perception of America. Almost every major news medium on
earth is either center-left or left. And the left around the world loathes
America.
That the poll's
results are synonymous with the left's perception of America is also
shown by another result of the poll:
"A
plurality of people polled in several officially American-allied nations also
rated the United States as dangerous. Thirty-seven percent of Mexicans and 17
percent of Canadians view their neighboring country with suspicion on the world
stage. A surprising 13 percent of American respondents rated their own nation
the biggest threat to world peace as well."
Who are these Mexicans,
Canadians and Americans? They are leftist Mexicans, leftist Canadians and
leftist Americans.
Third, there is a
morally flawed understanding of "peace." In much of the world (again,
thanks to the left), peace has been so narrowly defined as to be
morally irrelevant. It essentially means not having troops fighting in a foreign
country. Thus, because the United States has troops fighting in Afghanistan and
recently had troops fighting in Iraq, it is considered a "threat to peace."
But Iran,
with no troops on foreign soil, is not considered a threat to peace, even
though it sustains terror movements, murders its own people, seeks to
annihilate Israel, props up the mass murdering Syrian regime and is rapidly
developing a nuclear weapon.
It is only according to
this definition of "peace" that states like Iran, North Korea and
China — states that stay in power through violence — are not deemed threats to
peace.
Finally, here are two
questions that should make clear the moral absurdity of the poll's results:
Would the world be more or less
peaceful if only America disarmed?
Would the world be more or less
peaceful if only America were armed?
No comments:
Post a Comment