The pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, freedom
and individual liberty
"There
is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it
steadily." --George
Washington
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The
Fed was conceived in iniquity and raised in sin
Reuters'
Analysis Excerpt on the Federal Income Tax
Economists like Emmanuel Saez, the University
of California, Berkeley scholar who rates as the leading authority on high
incomes, points out that refusal to revisit stiff top marginal rates makes no
sense. Top tax rates today could double, Saez and his colleagues say, without
jeopardizing our economic health.
Saez has more than economic theory on his
side. He has history. On this anniversary of the first income tax, let’s
be sure to remember that history — and the Americans who made it.
In 1909, former Attorney General Wayne MacVeagh asked “Why should the
colossal incomes and the colossal accumulations of the possessors of what Mr.
Carnegie himself calls surplus wealth continue to be exempted from proper
taxation?”
“Gigantic fortunes,” MacVeagh said, serve as
“serious obstacles to the contentment, the peace and the healthy growth of the
community as to call for their abatement.” Let’s stop treating our
egalitarian-minded forebears like MacVeagh as crazy old uncles we hideaway in
the attic. Let’s invite them into our public policy parlors. They have
much to share. We have much to learn.
*********
The
Analysis of the Analysis
The
main trouble with the above analysis (and there are many troubles to be sure)
is that this brief history leaves out the role of the Federal Reserve. It
was the creation of the dollar reserve structure that created the US’s 20th
century “prosperity” not the enforced confiscation of taxes.
The
Fed created the boom of the Roaring 20s by debasing the dollar, supposedly to
help the English pound regain its status as the world’s dominant currency. In 1929, the
market finally, quite understandably, crashed and the long, dark night
of the Depression swept over both the US and most of the rest of the world.
Panicked,
Fed bankers apparently prevailed on Franklin Delano Roosevelt to confiscate
gold. This was so that US citizens would not trade in their “dollars”
for gold at commercial banks and find out that the banks had none because
the Fed had transgressed against the legal dollar/gold reserve ratio.
That was, after all, how the Fed had created a spurious boom and debased
the dollar, by printing more paper than they were allowed to, given their gold
holdings.
Yes,
the Fed was conceived in iniquity and raised in sin. Its history is a
kind of continued criminal action. As the Great Depression rolled on,
the bankers and the US and British political elite became more and more worried
about civil insurrection.
Fortunately,
and most conveniently, a world war broke out. After the war, the US
was the single, lone, dominant standing nation-state. Its gross national
product for a while represented 50 percent of the world’s, apparently.
And when the US spent itself almost into oblivion during the Vietnam War, the
result was a cessation of the gold standard entirely and the birth of the
petrodollar.
Richard
Nixon dispatched “Super K” – Henry Kissinger – to Saudi Arabia to instruct the
Saud family to trade dollars only for oil. As the biggest producer of oil in
the world, Saudi Arabia was also the marginal hinge and its currency policies
were therefore the policies of OPEC.
The
world would now have to hold US dollars to buy oil and thus there would always
be a demand for these dollars. This deal gained Kissinger a TIME magazine
cover picturing him as Superman and gave rise to a thousand myths about modern
US “exceptionalism.”
The
original US exceptionalism had to do with its agrarian republican heritage, in
large part enunciated by Thomas Jefferson. The US’s late 20th
century exceptionalism as enunciated by a controlled mainstream media suggested
fuzzily that “American values” were responsible for the US’s extraordinary
prosperity. US workers were simply more efficient, unions were
more determined, individuals more patriotic, science more
expert, multinationals more determinedly managerial, etc. The US was
indeed a shining house on the hill … only it wasn’t.
US
prosperity was built on Mao’s famous dictum: Power springs from the barrel of a
gun. We know today that there is oil all over the Earth. But throughout
the 20th century, top elites managed to control discoveries and
exploitation via “green” maneuverings and repetitive fictions such as “peak
oil.”
This
is the REAL history of the 20th century. US prosperity was
built from calculated resource scarcity and determined intimidation of the Saud
family and other oil producers. Because the world had to hold dollars, the US
could print as many of them as it wanted. No other nation could do so.
The
dollar tribute poured into the US. Never had there been such a mighty empire.
The dollar reserve system allowed the power elite to build an enormous military
and a vast penal system. Gradually, US Intel spread its agents and influence
around the world.
The
US’s 20th century prosperity had NOTHING to do with graduated
taxation or the idea advanced by the above Reuters analysis that somehow a
political determination to create a “moral” people with income-leveling
facilities sparked US power and prosperity in the 20th century.
Leaving
aside any potentially logical reasons to forcibly confiscate wealth, the secret
monetary history of the US shows us clearly how US and British elites
manipulated the world’s monetary system to gain riches grander than
Croesus’s.
For
those with the stomach to face reality (and if you are reading this, perhaps
you are such a person) there is something else to consider that has been
mentioned before. It is the idea that the power elite responsible for the
petrodollar has decided to abandon it.
We
base this conclusion on the sudden emergence of shale oil and the increasing
Western spawned violence destabilizing the Middle East. It seems that a move is
afoot by the dollar’s controllers to gradually substitute something else for
the dollar, a more globalized “bancor” – as Keynes once predicted.
In
any event, these are trends you should be careful to watch. Don’t be fooled by
the mainstream media’s dominant social themes. The Anglo sphere remains the
world’s most powerful entity and it is highly doubtful that global financial
maneuverings would be taking place without its acquiescence.
Of
course, you will read none of the above in the Reuters articles or the main
stream media, only that the moral imperatives of leveling created the
prosperity that US citizens cherished in the 20th century.
How this explains the economic chaos of the 21st remains a
mystery into which Reuters or the main stream media does not delve. Probably
for obvious reasons.
######
Update From Obama's 'Make 'em Suffer'
File - Mad Yet?
The
federal government has now been shut down for seven days, and the two parties
appear no closer to a deal to fund it. The Republican-controlled House
has passed smaller measures funding various parts of government to pressure
Democrats to keep saying "no." These included restoring
funding for veterans benefits, caring for children with cancer, food assistance
and national parks. The House even passed a bill by a vote of 407-0 granting
retroactive pay to government workers on furlough. Speaker John Boehner (R-OH)
says he won't bring up a bill to fund the entire government until Barack Obama
and the Democrats agree to negotiate deficit spending. The Obama administration
and Senate Democrats refuse to budge, believing that the shutdown is only going
to hurt Republicans politically. The one thing both sides agree on is that it's
the other side's fault.
Obama
did say over the weekend that he's willing to negotiate changes to ObamaCare
... but only after Republicans end the shutdown with a "clean"
continuing resolution and then agree to hike the debt ceiling. That's
convincing -- give him everything he wants and then he'll talk. Of course,
negotiating with Obama is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks
over all the pieces, craps on the board and then struts around like it won the
game.
Meanwhile,
the president continued his gambit to make the shutdown as annoying and inconvenient
as possible, erecting Barricades at every national park and closing down every
government website -- all of which takes more effort and expense than simply
letting things be. The "Amber Alert Website" is shut down,
Michelle's Website "Let's Move" is up [www.letsmove.gov.] Here's but a short list of closings due to this
ridiculous political stunt: The Iwo Jim Memorial is closed, veterans
were removed from the Vietnam War Memorial, highway pull-offs [public
roads] with a view of Mount Rushmore are blocked, some of the Florida
ocean is off-limits, the Grand Canyon is closed despite Arizona's offer to keep
it open with state funds and 60 families with vacation homes at Lake Mead were
ordered to leave. One angry Park Ranger confirmed that it's all politics:
"We've been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. It's
disgusting." It's also standard operating procedure for Barack Obama.
######
Dr. Ben Carson: Obamacare Hurts Just
as Healthcare 'Golden Age' Emerges by Greg Richter
Just
as healthcare enters a "golden age," Obamacare threatens to reverse
course, warn Dr. Ben Carson and Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas in a guest
editorial for Forbes.
"The full promise of genomic medicine informing diagnosis and treatment beckons from just over the horizon," the two write. Young doctors just starting out "have the ability to alleviate human suffering that no generation of doctors has ever previously known," they say.
Carson
retired in May as a professor of neurosurgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and
pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. He has become a tea party
favorite after criticizing the Affordable Care Act at this year's
National Prayer Breakfast as President Barack Obama sat on the dais.
Burgess, part of the House's tea party caucus, was a practicing physician
before winning Dick Armey's former seat in 2003.
Obamacare was not the product of careful study by a learned group, the two say, but "a hastily contrived political farce that was literally cobbled together at the last possible minute." The writers are critical that successful state models were not looked at. The Healthy Indiana program, they note, cut healthcare prices by 10 percent during a two-year period. The Affordable Care Act was never intended to actually become law, they argue "— except that it did." In the past 3 1/2 years since its passage, Obamacare has been "pushed and prodded" by officials "to give it the appearance of workability."
America is on the threshold, they write, of finding out whether it will be a success. Americans without insurance from their employers could begin signing up for state-run exchanges on Oct. 1, but the first week has been bugged with problems with rampant reports of failures to log in. The government hasn't released numbers of those who have successfully signed up for insurance, but the site was taken down over the weekend to fix the problems. Tea party Republicans in the House and Senate have led the effort to tie a budget bill to funding for Obamacare, and the government has been shut down since Oct. 1 over the impasse.
"In medicine, we sometimes talk about the compression of morbidities, how the ravages of time and multiple maladies may overwhelm the patient at the end of life," Carson and Burgess say. "That compression sequence also seems to describe afflictions of the Affordable Care Act as it careens towards implementation."
Obamacare was not the product of careful study by a learned group, the two say, but "a hastily contrived political farce that was literally cobbled together at the last possible minute." The writers are critical that successful state models were not looked at. The Healthy Indiana program, they note, cut healthcare prices by 10 percent during a two-year period. The Affordable Care Act was never intended to actually become law, they argue "— except that it did." In the past 3 1/2 years since its passage, Obamacare has been "pushed and prodded" by officials "to give it the appearance of workability."
America is on the threshold, they write, of finding out whether it will be a success. Americans without insurance from their employers could begin signing up for state-run exchanges on Oct. 1, but the first week has been bugged with problems with rampant reports of failures to log in. The government hasn't released numbers of those who have successfully signed up for insurance, but the site was taken down over the weekend to fix the problems. Tea party Republicans in the House and Senate have led the effort to tie a budget bill to funding for Obamacare, and the government has been shut down since Oct. 1 over the impasse.
"In medicine, we sometimes talk about the compression of morbidities, how the ravages of time and multiple maladies may overwhelm the patient at the end of life," Carson and Burgess say. "That compression sequence also seems to describe afflictions of the Affordable Care Act as it careens towards implementation."
######
"The known propensity of a democracy is to
licentiousness which the ambitious call, and ignorant believe to be
liberty." –Fisher
Ames, speech in the Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
No comments:
Post a Comment