The
pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free markets and individual
liberty
"There is but one straight
course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
To subscribe, see note
below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Multiple Obama Birth Certificates Surface In Alabama
Eligibility Case
Not that we are surprised, but now there are multiple
copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s “real” birth certificate that are surfacing
and they are clearly indicating fraud. In a rare move, the Alabama Democrat Party has submitted an amicus
brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most
likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over
it. The Alabama Democrat Party just
submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted
at the White House website in 2011. Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s
counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that
was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001. Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced
another bogus one. Still a third birth
certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.
Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who
supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and
denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as
part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper
Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will
also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:
“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his
mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a
proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the
authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of
President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling
the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also
stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything
in Alabama.” How
many birth certificates does it take to prove "I'm not a crook"?
~~~~~~
Is the U.S. Military Preparing to purge Christians?
Religious liberty groups have grave concerns after they learned the Pentagon is vetting its guide on
religious tolerance with a group that compared Christian evangelism to “rape”
and advocated that military personnel who proselytize should be court marshaled. The Military Religious Freedom
Foundation is calling on the Air Force to enforce a regulation that they
believe calls for the court martial of
any service member caught proselytizing. President Mikey Weinstein and
others from his organization met privately with Pentagon officials on April 23.
He said U.S. troops who proselytize
are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished – by the hundreds if
necessary – to stave off what he called a “tidal wave of fundamentalists.” “Someone
needs to be punished for this,” Weinstein told Fox News. “Until the Air Force or Army or Navy or
Marine Corps punishes a member of the military for unconstitutional religious
proselytizing and oppression, we will never have the ability to stop this
horrible, horrendous, dehumanizing behavior.”
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, told Fox
News he was stunned that the Pentagon would be taking counsel and advice from
the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. “Why would military leadership be meeting with one of the most rabid
atheists in America to discuss religious freedom in the military,” Perkins
said. “That’s like consulting with China on how to improve human rights.” Are you angry
yet? What are you going to do?
~~~~~~
Miami Archbishop: ‘Gay Marriage,’ Moral Relativism –
Society ‘On Its Way To Totalitarianism’ By Michael W. Chapman
Miami’s Catholic archbishop, Thomas
Wenski, said establishing “gay marriage” would corrupt the natural setting for
rearing children by a mother and a father, and further spread “moral
relativism,” one of the signs that democracy is “on its way to
totalitarianism.” The state has always recognized and favored
heterosexual marriages “because such marriages best provide the optimal
conditions for the raising of future generations of its citizens,” said
Archbishop Wenski in an Apr. 24 homily at the Red Mass for the Miami Catholic Lawyers
Guild. “And all honest social research
as well as anecdotal evidence shows that children are ‘hard-wired’ to be best
raised by a mother and father who are married to each other in a low conflict
relationship.” In other words, he said, “it’s about what’s best for children. Only in the marriage of a man and
a woman can ‘two become one flesh’ (Genesis 2: 24) and thus create a conjugal
society – or family – which provides that the individuals who give life to
children should be the ones to raise them in a bonded and enduring
relationship.” The push for “so-called same-sex marriage, if it
prevails,” said the archbishop, “will
fundamentally change” the mother-father-children family and “open a Pandora’s
Box of unforeseen and, to be sure, unintended
consequences – as the more permissive no-fault divorce legislation did
some 40 years ago.”
“[T]he proponents of so-called same-sex marriage would now redefine
marriage for all as existing solely for the gratification of two (and
why just two?) consenting adults,” said Abp. Wenski.
The archbishop, who represents 1.3 million Catholics in 118 churches in
South Florida, said the push for
same-sex marriage is just the logical consequence of the moral relativism found
in Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood, which
“virtually establishes a new secular religion based on the ‘right to define
one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and the mystery of
human life.’”That is “moral relativism,” he said.
~~~~~~
FDA steps in
between parents and their children; Will Let 15 Year-Old Girls Buy
Morning-After Pill Over the Counter
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Tuesday it would allow the
Plan B One-Step contraceptive to be sold without a prescription to girls as
young as 15 years of age. The announcement partially reverses a December 2011
decision that prevented the sale of the emergency contraceptive to all females
of reproductive age, which was also overturned by a U.S. district judge in New
York on April 5. The FDA said its approval was not related to the judge's
ruling. Instead, the agency said it was responding to an amended marketing
application from Teva Women's Health Inc, a unit of Plan B maker Teva
Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. Teva originally applied to sell Plan B to all
females of reproductive age, but changed its latest bid to those 15 and older
after 2011. The amended application was pending when Judge Edward Korman handed
down his ruling, the FDA said. The pill known as "Plan B" has long
been at the center of political and religious battles. The FDA initially approved sale of the drug to all reproductive age
females, but was ordered to bar girls under 17 by U.S. Health and Human
Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who came under fire from women's
activists who accused her of bowing to political pressure from social
conservatives.
~~~~~~
Did you know Boston and America’s 200-Year-War with Islam by Gary DeMar
The Boston bombings, the Fort Hood shootings, the events of 9/11, and
numerous international Islamic terrorist activities are only new to people who have no sense of history. Most
Americans are familiar with the first line of the United States Marine Corps
hymn, “From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli” but most likely don’t know the source of the
“Tripoli” reference. The line “to
the shores of Tripoli” refers to the
First Barbary War, specifically the Battle of Derna, that took place in 1805. Our earliest
founders were familiar with the terrorist ways of radical Islamists.
Thomas Jefferson, who was
serving as the ambassador to France, and John
Adams, the Ambassador to Britain, met in London with Ambassador
Abdrahaman, the Dey of Tripoli’s ambassador to Britain, in an attempt to negotiate a peace treaty. Peace for an Islamist means
surrender to Islam.
Peace would come at a price. If America wanted “temporary peace,” a
one-year guarantee, it would cost $66,000 plus a 10% commission. “Everlasting
peace” was a bargain at $160,000 plus the obligatory commission. This only
applied to Tripoli. Other Muslim nations would also have to be paid. The amount
came to $1.3 million. But there was no assurance that the treaties would be
honored. In vain, Jefferson and Adams
tried to argue that America was not at war with Tripoli. In what way
had the U.S provoked the Muslims, they asked? Ambassador Abdrahaman went on to
explain “the finer points of Islamic jihad” to the Koranically challenged
Jefferson and Adams. In a letter to John Jay, Jefferson wrote the following:
“The Ambassador answered us that it
was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran,
that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners,
that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be
found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every
Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Abdrahaman was paraphrasing the Koran’s “rules of
engagement” found in the 47 Surah: “Whenever you encounter the ones who
disbelieve [during wartime], seize them by their necks until once you have
subdued them, then tie them up as prisoners, either in order to release them
later on, or also to ask for ransom, until war lays down her burdens.”
~~~~~~
Why Haven’t These Homosexual Stories Been Reported? by Bradlee Dean
The Jason Collins “I’m gay . . . I’m out . . . I’m proud . . . and
I play basketball” story is all over the internet. There are other homosexual stories that barely get a mention. Why?
Because they go against the gay narrative. Recently, Family Research
Council released video footage of Floyd Corkins, the homosexual activist who
walked into the lobby of the Family Research Council in August 2012 with a
semi-automatic pistol and a backpack filled with 100 rounds of ammunition and
15 Chick-fil-A sandwiches. Corkins shot the Family Research Council’s security
guard, Leo Johnson, who then successfully subdued him before he was taken into
custody.
During an FBI interrogation, Corkins stated that he intended to “kill as
many as possible and smear the Chick-fil-A sandwiches in victims’ faces.” Prosecutors
said that Corkins planned to leave FRC after the attack and go to another
conservative group to continue the reign of terror. A handwritten list of three
other groups was found with Corkins’ belongings. An investigation of Corkins’
computer found that he identified his targets on the Southern Poverty Law
Center’s website. Even after the shooting at the FRC, the SPLC went so far as
to put an article on the front page of their website in an attempt to heighten
the FRC’s label as a hate group. Another
example of assault by the pro-homosexual lobby happened this week. The head of
the Catholic Church in Belgium, Archbishop Andre-Joseph Leonard, was
participating in a debate on blasphemy laws at the ULB University in Brussels.
While he was seated with his eyes closed in prayer, four topless women,
representing the pro-abortion and homosexual group FEMEN, began assaulting the
archbishop with shouts and curses while dousing him with water in bottles
shaped like the Virgin Mary. The women disrobed to reveal black-painted mockery
slogans on their bare chests and backs, such as ‘my body my rules,’ and anus
dei is coming.’ They also held signs reading ‘stop homophobia’. Why the attacks? Let’s look behind the
façade. Back in 1987, the Gay Manifesto was published by Michael Swift
in the Gay Community News on February 15–21, 1987. It was also
interjected into the Congressional Record (omitting the preface, which I have
added below), showing that Congress is well aware of this content. When the
homosexual radicals became aware that people were alarmed by this homosexual
manifesto, they looked for something to cover their tracks. So they reverted to
saying that the homosexual manifesto was merely a “satire” rather than a
reality. Swift’s original preface stated: “This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption
of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.” I
lay this to your candor. You decide if this is merely a satire, or if this is
actually being played out in reality. The video is revealing, but not
for all ages; watch
here
~~~~~~
DHS Targets Gun Owners in Training Video on Terrorism by Dave Jolly
Have you wondered why the Department of Homeland Security has purchased
over 2 billion rounds of ammunition, some of which are hollow points that are
deemed illegal to use in war by international law? Or why have they
purchased thousands of fully automatic assault rifles? Why is Obama
weeding out top military leaders and only keeping those who say they will fire
upon Americans if ordered to do so?
Perhaps a recently revealed DHS training video will shed some light on
the answer. In the video, they
show a mock raid and news report on a house with suspected terrorists.
The house is not occupied by Muslim extremists, radical bombers or a violent
militant group like Obama’s own New Black Panthers. They portray the home
to be that of a militia group with illegal guns. Watch
~~~~~~
Fact-free gun control crusades
Amid all the heated, emotional advocacy of gun control, have you ever heard even one person present
convincing hard evidence that tighter gun control laws have in fact reduced
murders? Think about all the states, communities within states, as well
as foreign countries, that have either tight gun control laws or loose or
non-existent gun control laws. With so
many variations and so many sources of evidence available, surely there would
be some compelling evidence somewhere if tighter gun control laws actually
reduced the murder rate. And if tighter gun control laws don’t actually
reduce the murder rate, then why are we being stampeded toward such laws after
every shooting that gets media attention? Have the media outlets that you follow ever even mentioned that some studies
have produced evidence that murder rates tend to be higher in places with tight
gun control laws?
~~~~~~
According to the leading experts on “True Islam,” all Muslims should
condemn attacks and the killing of American innocents. I suppose that explains the flood of newspaper and internet articles
quoting American Imams. Once again, Islamic leaders are busy renouncing another
terror attack and offering to help America rid itself of the threat of
“radicalized fanatics” who misunderstand accurate interpretations of their
Islamic Holy book. US based Imams like Suhaib Webb from the Islamic
Society of Boston Cultural Center are fervently distancing themselves from the
recent Boston terror attack. Appearing contrite, Islamic leaders lined up to
help left wing journalists like Mohamed Ghilan of “Aljazeera” and Glen
Greenwald of “The Guardian” denounce on one hand, then rationalize on the
other, the murders, traumatic amputations and lock down of a US city that
followed the Boston Marathon bombings. As
for Mr. Ghilan’s (The Irony of Muslim Terror) and Mr. Greenwald’s (The same
motive for anti-US ’terrorism’ is cited over and over), I have to admit I have
never read two more brilliantly worded anti-American Islamic propaganda pieces.
Both writers claim that Islam—hijacked by fanatics motivated by political
agendas, not true Islamic ideology—is a religion of peace. To Ghilan and
Greenwald, Islamic terror is an explainable political agenda motivated by
revenge for historical atrocities committed during twelfth century European
Christian crusades and irresponsible collateral casualties from current US
military operations in Muslim nations.
According to Mr. Ghilan, the “True” Islamic faith does
not tolerate and condemns murder of innocents. Murder carries the sentence of
death in the Muslim world however, Ghilan conveniently forgets to mention so
does homosexuality, blasphemy and apostasy. In his Aljazeera Op-Ed, Ghilan condemns the anti-
Muslim rhetoric that is flooding our information superhighway fueling the “Islamaphobia”
and “bigotry” that unfairly stigmatizes peaceful Muslims. Mr. Greenwald is even more stinging in his
criticism of what he characterizes as Christianities anti-Muslim history and
irresponsible US aggression in the Muslim world. However, I do not hear any of them speaking out and
condemning the terrorist financing that flows from Saudi Arabia and Qatar the
homelands of the very fanaticism they claim to condemn. Nowhere in any of their
articles, or the explanations coming from American Muslim leaders, do I hear
calls for holding terrors financiers accountable for the spread of Islamic
violence plaguing our world. Of course not.
Why would any “true Muslim” bite the hand that feeds them? “Allah forbid”
Imam Webb never gets to see Mecca or Medina again. Moreover, that he doesn’t
receive his annual infusion of Saudi money laundered through US based Islamic
charities to continue his peaceful
work at the mosque (with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood) that masquerades as a
“Cultural Center.” The media
here and abroad do not like to talk about this and neither does the US
government, but the greatest cause of
terrorism is petrodollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Salafism,
a puritanical branch of Islam is exploding all over our world and the Saudi’s
are funding it. Obama and Hillary’s “Arab Spring” has provided the Saudis
with many opportunities to feed the operations of violent Salafist groups Saudi
Arabia needs to export Saudi Wahhabism, a conservative branch of Sunni Islam
practiced by Saudi Arabia’s ruling family. A ruling family that can be very grateful
at election time.
~~~~~~
"Those gentlemen, who will be elected senators, will
fix themselves in the federal town, and become citizens of that town more than
of your state."
--George Mason, speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, 1788
No comments:
Post a Comment