The pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free
markets and individual liberty
"There is but
one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
To
subscribe, see note below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Up to 75% Could Be Hit by Obamacare Tax
By Greg Richter
The
so-called "Cadillac Tax" facing employers who offer premium
healthcare plans to their workers already is affecting employees, even though
it doesn't kick in until 2018. Employers say they have to get started bringing
down costs now, The New York Times reports, so employees who are used to
$20 co-pays at the doctor's office and $500 deductibles are learning a new
reality. Many now are looking at deductibles as high as $6,000 for families.
That's exactly how Obamacare planners designed it, the Times story says. The intent of what is officially known as the Affordable Care Act all along was to get companies to drop plans that protect workers from the high cost of healthcare, which can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures. "The consumer should continue to expect that their plan is going to be more expensive, and they will have less benefits," Cynthia Weidner of the benefits consultant HighRoads told the Times. Still, the tax is one of the most controversial parts of the healthcare law. It imposes a 40 percent tax on the portion of a health plan's cost that exceeds $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family. That cost includes what both the employer and employee pay.
Some employees are feeling the pinch already. The Times talked to a nursing assistant who had to drop out of school and get extra jobs to pay for medicine for her husband, who has cystic fibrosis. "My husband didn’t choose to be born this way," said Abbey Bruce. “The reality is it is going to hit more and more people over time, at least as currently written in law, ” said Bradley Herring, a health economist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Herring estimated that as many as 75 percent of plans could be affected by the tax over the next decade — unless employers manage to significantly rein in their costs.
That's exactly how Obamacare planners designed it, the Times story says. The intent of what is officially known as the Affordable Care Act all along was to get companies to drop plans that protect workers from the high cost of healthcare, which can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures. "The consumer should continue to expect that their plan is going to be more expensive, and they will have less benefits," Cynthia Weidner of the benefits consultant HighRoads told the Times. Still, the tax is one of the most controversial parts of the healthcare law. It imposes a 40 percent tax on the portion of a health plan's cost that exceeds $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family. That cost includes what both the employer and employee pay.
Some employees are feeling the pinch already. The Times talked to a nursing assistant who had to drop out of school and get extra jobs to pay for medicine for her husband, who has cystic fibrosis. "My husband didn’t choose to be born this way," said Abbey Bruce. “The reality is it is going to hit more and more people over time, at least as currently written in law, ” said Bradley Herring, a health economist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Herring estimated that as many as 75 percent of plans could be affected by the tax over the next decade — unless employers manage to significantly rein in their costs.
~~~~~~~
Entire US Government Run By Low Level Employees
In
a last minute press conference Wednesday evening, President Obama announced
that the entire nation has been run by a, “secret society of low level
government employees” for the past few years. Janitors, secretaries, and even
unpaid high school interns make up just some of the known members of
this clandestine group. While little is currently known about the group, the
White House has confirmed that they have been responsible for all of the Obama
administration’s recent scandals, and possibly many future scandals as well.
President Obama noted that he and his administration only found out about the
group, “a few days ago”, when they saw the story posted on the White House’s
website ” just like everyone else”. The President claimed that he and
those in his administration were simply, “too high up to have any real control
over the IRS and actions in Benghazi” and then went on to say, “my
administration and I are simply too disconnected from the inner workings of the
US government to be aware of such things”. Noting, that he and his
Administration, “can’t be expected to know every high level action taken by the
Obama administration”. Credulously adding, “do you have any idea how far away
my office is from the IRS, or the city of Benghazi, for that matter?”. When
asked about how such scandals could take place under the Obama administration’s
watch, Attorney General explained, “we like to roll out of the offices at
around two or three pm. This left our offices totally open to the
ravages of these low level employees. They had everything from the keys to the
wifi passwords, they could have done anything
~~~~~~
Russia Warns Obama: Monsanto
The
shocking minutes relating to President Putin’s meeting this past week with US
Secretary of State John Kerry reveal the Russian leaders “extreme outrage” over
the Obama regimes continued protection of global seed and plant bio-genetic
giants Syngenta and Monsanto in the face of a growing “bee apocalypse” that the
Kremlin warns “will most certainly” lead to world war. According to these minutes, released
in the Kremlin today by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of
the Russian Federation (MNRE), Putin was so incensed over the Obama regimes
refusal to discuss this grave matter that he refused for three hours to even
meet with Kerry, who had traveled to Moscow on a scheduled diplomatic mission,
but then relented so as to not cause an even greater rift between these two
nations.
At
the center of this dispute between Russia and the US, this MNRE report says, is
the
“undisputed evidence” that a class of neuro-active insecticides chemically
related to nicotine, known as neonicotinoids, are destroying our planets bee
population, and which if left unchecked could destroy our world’s ability to
grow enough food to feed its population. So grave has this situation
become, the MNRE reports, the full European Commission (EC) this past week
instituted a two-year precautionary ban (set to begin on 1 December 2013) on
these “bee killing” pesticides following the lead of Switzerland, France,
Italy, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine, all of whom had previously banned these
most dangerous of genetically altered organisms from being used on the
continent. Two of the most feared neonicotinoids being banned are Actara and Cruiser made by the Swiss global bio-tech seed and
pesticide giant Syngenta AG which employs over 26,000 people in over 90
countries and ranks third in total global sales in the commercial agricultural
seeds market. Important to note, this report says, is that Syngenta, along with
bio-tech giants Monsanto, Bayer, Dow and DuPont, now control nearly 100% of the
global market for genetically modified pesticides, plants and seeds. Also
to note about Syngenta, this report continues, is that in 2012 it was
criminally charged in Germany for concealing the fact that its genetically
modified corn killed cattle, and settled a class-action lawsuit in the US for
$105 million after it was discovered they had contaminated the drinking supply
of some 52 million Americans in more than 2,000 water districts with its
“gender-bending” herbicide Atrazine. To
how staggeringly frightful this situation is, the MNRE says, can be seen in the
report issued this past March by the American Bird Conservancy (ABC) wherein
they warned our whole planet is in danger, and as we can, in part, read:
“As
part of a study on impacts from the world’s most widely used class of
insecticides, nicotine-like chemicals called neonicotinoids, American Bird
Conservancy (ABC) has called for a ban on their use as seed treatments and for
the suspension of all applications pending an independent review of the
products’ effects on birds, terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates, and other
wildlife. “It is clear that these chemicals have the potential to affect entire
food chains. The environmental persistence of the neonicotinoids, their
propensity for runoff and for groundwater infiltration, and their cumulative
and largely irreversible mode of action in invertebrates raise significant
environmental concerns,” said Cynthia Palmer, co-author of the report and
Pesticides Program Manager for ABC, one of the nation’s leading bird
conservation organizations.
ABC
commissioned world renowned environmental toxicologist Dr. Pierre Mineau to
conduct the research. The 100-page report, “The Impact of the Nation’s Most
Widely Used Insecticides on Birds,” reviews 200 studies on neonicotinoids
including industry research obtained through the US Freedom of Information Act.
The report evaluates the toxicological risk to birds and aquatic systems and
includes extensive comparisons with the older pesticides that the
neonicotinoids have replaced. The assessment concludes that the neonicotinoids
are lethal to birds and to the aquatic systems on which they depend.
“A
single corn kernel coated with a neonicotinoid can kill a songbird,” Palmer
said. “Even a tiny grain of wheat or canola treated with the oldest
neonicotinoid — called imidacloprid — can fatally poison a bird. And as little
as 1/10th of a neonicotinoid-coated corn seed per day during egg-laying season
is all that is needed to affect reproduction.” The new report concludes
that neonicotinoid contamination levels in both surface- and ground water in
the United States and around the world are already beyond the threshold found
to kill many aquatic invertebrates.”
And
to how bad the world’s agricultural system has really become due to these
genetically modified plants, pesticides and seeds, this report continues, can
be seen by the EC’s proposal this past week, following their ban on
neonicotinoids, in which they plan to criminalize nearly all seeds and plants
not registered with the European Union, and as we
can, in part, read:
“Europe is rushing towards the good ol days circa 1939,
40… A new law proposed by the European Commission would make it illegal to
“grow, reproduce or trade” any vegetable seeds that have not been “tested,
approved and accepted” by a new EU bureaucracy named the “EU Plant Variety
Agency.” It’s called the Plant Reproductive Material Law, and it attempts to
put the government in charge of virtually all plants and seeds. Home gardeners
who grow their own plants from non-regulated seeds would be considered
criminals under this law.”
This MRNE report points out that even though this EC
action may appear draconian, it is nevertheless necessary in order to purge the
continent from continued contamination of these genetically bred “seed
monstrosities.” Most
perplexing in all of this, the MRNE says, and which led to Putin’s anger at the
US, has been the Obama regimes efforts to protect pesticide-producer profits
over the catastrophic damaging being done to the environment, and as the
Guardian News Service detailed in their 2 May article titled “US rejects EU
claim of insecticide as prime reason for bee colony collapse” and which, in
part, says:
“The
European Union voted this week for a two-year ban on a class of pesticides,
known as neonicotinoids, that has been associated with the bees’ collapse. The
US government report, in contrast, found multiple causes for the collapse of
the honeybees.”
To
the “truer” reason for the Obama regimes protection of these bio-tech giants
destroying our world, the MRNE says, can be viewed in the report titled “How
did Barack Obama become Monsanto’s man in Washington?” and which, in part,
says:
“After
his victory in the 2008 election, Obama filled key posts with Monsanto people,
in federal agencies that wield tremendous force in food issues, the USDA and
the FDA: At the USDA, as the director of the National Institute of Food and
Agriculture, Roger Beachy, former director of the Monsanto Danforth Center. As
deputy commissioner of the FDA, the new food-safety-issues czar, the infamous
Michael Taylor, former vice-president for public policy for Monsanto. Taylor
had been instrumental in getting approval for Monsanto’s genetically engineered
bovine growth hormone.”
Even
worse, after Russia suspended the import and use of an Monsanto genetically
modified corn following a study suggesting a link to breast cancer and organ
damage this past September, the Russia Today News Service reported on the Obama
regimes response:
“The
US House of Representatives quietly passed a last-minute addition to the
Agricultural Appropriations Bill for 2013 last week – including a provision
protecting genetically modified seeds from litigation in the face of health
risks. The rider, which is officially known as the Farmer Assurance Provision,
has been derided by opponents of biotech lobbying as the “Monsanto Protection
Act,” as it would strip federal courts of the authority to immediately halt the
planting and sale of genetically modified (GMO) seed crop regardless of any
consumer health concerns.
The provision, also decried as a “biotech rider,” should
have gone through the Agricultural or Judiciary Committees for review. Instead, no hearings were held, and the piece was
evidently unknown to most Democrats (who hold the majority in the Senate) prior
to its approval as part of HR 993, the short-term funding bill that was
approved to avoid a federal government shutdown.”
On
26 March, Obama quietly signed this “Monsanto Protection Act” into law thus
ensuring the American people have no recourse against this bio-tech giant
as they fall ill by the tens of millions, and many millions will surely end up
dying in what this MRNE report calls the greatest agricultural apocalypse in
human history as over 90% of feral (wild) bee population in the US has already
died out, and up to 80% of domestic bees have died out too.
~~~~~~
Obama Claims That Working With Muslim Brotherhood Will
Bring Victory Over Terrorism by Pamela Geller
The
president decided last Thursday – five years into his presidency – to finally
address the gravest threat to our nation and the West in the wake of a bloody
wave of jihad attacks under his sloppy and feckless watch. He said, “Victory will be measured in parents
taking their kids to school; immigrants coming to our shores; fans taking in a
ballgame; a veteran starting a business; a bustling city street.”
What
does that even mean? He speaks of “victory” when he is the architect
of defeat. He speaks of victory while the Fort Hood victims
languish and slaughtering jihadist Nidal Hasan still has not been brought to
trial, but has received more than a quarter-of-a-million dollars in
compensation. He speaks of victory when he won’t even call the
jihad attack on a London street “terrorism,” instead terming it “senseless
violence.” Jihad beheading victim Lee
Rigby will receive the same tribute as soldiers who die in action, but Fort
Hood jihad victims are victims of a “criminal act of single individual,” not
international terrorism. Why would Obama authorize a drone hit on Anwar
al-Awlaki (who never killed anyone) but not give the victims of his Islamic
preachings the same military designation? What is his plan? It’s
to partner with Muslim Brotherhood groups in America that work feverishly to
“eliminate and destroy” America from within. Obama said Thursday that
“the
best way to prevent violent extremism is to work with the Muslim American
community – which has consistently rejected terrorism – to identify signs of
radicalization, and partner with law enforcement when an individual is drifting
toward violence.”
Work
with the Muslim American community? Just as Obama said this, former Hamas-CAIR
official Cyrus McGoldrick urged Muslims not to talk to law enforcement. “And
never let them in your home.” This is Hamas-CAIR’s policy as well. They
urge Muslims not to cooperate with the authorities. Really, Obama? You’re
counting on these Islamic supremacists?
Robert Spencer said,
“The
Muslim American community has consistently rejected terrorism? Four separate
studies since 1998 have all found that 80 percent of U.S. mosques were teaching
jihad, Islamic supremacism, and hatred and contempt for Jews and Christians. …
And in the summer of 2011 came another study showing that only 19 percent of
mosques in U.S. don’t teach jihad violence and/or Islamic supremacism.”
But
Obama wants to work with the Muslim American community – despite the fact that
all the major Muslim groups in the U.S. are linked in various ways to the Muslim
Brotherhood, which is dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying
Western civilization from within.”
What’s his plan? To close Gitmo and release the killers, when we know the
recidivism rate is extraordinarily high. He stands by his drone attacks while
having denied the motive of jihadic doctrine. He is killing Americans and yet
he whines that we “compromised our basic values – by using torture to
interrogate our enemies.” He is denigrating the Bush administration’s
waterboarding of three killers that saved thousands of lives and led to the
killing of Osama bin Laden. Our soldiers are waterboarded so they understand
the process. Who does this poser think he’s kidding? He kills people, spies on
journalists and abandons our ambassador and other Americans in Libya, and he is preaching to us?
Obama
says that there have been no large-scale attacks in the U.S. I
disagree. Scores of large scale attacks were thwarted. That counts. And
Fort
Hood and Boston were large scale. Hundreds of people living with
shrapnel, broken flesh and bone – and the dead. Our delusional president claims our standing
in the world is what it was. I beg to differ. We are much weaker under his
reign. Obama’s abandonment of our allies in Egypt, Libya, Israel and Eastern
Europe has weakened our hegemony and influence in those regions. And he has
effectively surrendered to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Obama
claims that “unrest in the Arab World has also allowed extremists to gain a
foothold in countries like Libya and Syria.” That, too, is a deliberate
misrepresentation of what happened. Obama backed jihadists. That’s what
happened in the Muslim world. Did he think that backing jihadists in
Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and now Syria would end well? What’s his plan? Why didn’t Obama mention that his
administration scrubbed all counter terrorism materials and manuals of jihad
and Islam – disarming law enforcement and counter terrorism officials? Where
did that get us? Boston. When Obama speaks of the threat on our shores,
he only cites the rare non-Muslim attacks: “Finally, we face a real threat from
radicalized individuals here in the United States. Whether it’s a shooter at a
Sikh temple in Wisconsin; a plane flying into a building in Texas; or the
extremists who killed 168 people at the federal building in Oklahoma City.”
He
doesn’t say a word about the hundreds of thwarted, and in some cases
successful, acts of jihad. He goes on to explain that jihadists are
lying when they quote Quran chapter and verse and wage war in the case of Islam.
Obama said, “This ideology is based on a lie, for the United States is not at
war with Islam.” No, it is Obama
who is lying about the ideology. And while we may not be at war with Islam,
clearly there is a significant part of Islam that is at war with us. Are we
going to fight back?
~~~~~~
Blame the President for Benghazi by Colonel David Hunt
When
the American mission in Benghazi, Libya was attacked on September 11th, 2012,
only one person had the positional authority, legal mandate, and communications
apparatus to give the order to defend our personnel on the ground: the
President of the United States. The President did not give that order,
and four Americans died in Benghazi that day. All the rest of the nonsense to
which we have been treated–from prepared talking points, congressional
hearings, and finally to the outright lies–matter not when compared to the
ignominious moments in which the President of the United States refused to do
his job. That same day, two other American embassies in the Middle East were
also under attack in Sana, Yemen and Cairo, Egypt. As a result, our
intelligence systems were on high alert. When the calls, satellite and drone
feeds, faxes, and reports began bombarding every command center from Germany to
the United States, our nation, already at war for eleven years, was again under
siege. Staffs from Africa Command, European Command, the National Military
Command Center, the CIA Operations Center, the State Department Operations
Center, and the White House Situation Room were fully operational.
This
all means that on September 11, 2012, our national security apparatus was on
full alert. It means everyone was briefed. This is how it works; no games, no
conjecture, no television and movie looks, just real battle in real time with
real lives at risk. The road to
that indecision is littered with policy and leadership failures that culminated
in an American mission and clandestine CIA base being attacked and the murder
of our Ambassador and three dedicated Americans doing their jobs. However, the
one person responsible for it all is the one man who could have, but refused to,
even try to stop the carnage... the President of the United States. All the
President had to say within the first two hours while being briefed by the
Secretary of Defense was, “Send in a response force.” This command, followed by
his signature on a paper called Cross Border Authority, would have ordered the
Department of Defense to do everything and anything to save lives in Benghazi,
Libya. Three and a half years earlier, on April 9, 2009, President Obama had
done exactly that when pirates hijacked an American flagged merchant ship, Maersk Alabama, sailing off the coast
of Somalia. In this earlier incident, the President made the right decision
within hours to allow SEAL Team Six the time to plan and go. In the end, we all
witnessed a textbook successful rescue operation.
Fast
forward to September 11, 2012, and we have a desperate situation with Americans
in jeopardy. The same President, instead of deciding how to respond, disappeared for
the evening and then went to Las Vegas the following day to raise money
for his re-election campaign. Had the President ordered a rescue, he had
everything he needed to mount a prompt and forceful response--from F-16’s in
Aviano, Italy, to an armed and fueled plane standing by at C Company, 1st
Battalion, 10th Special Forces Group, training in Croatia–a mere three hours
from Benghazi by air. When the first shot was fired in Benghazi,
no one knew how long the fight would last. Subsequent government claims saying
we could not get there within the seven-plus hours that the tragedy lasted are
specious at best and an outright lie at worst. We did not even care enough to
try; that fact alone should make all Americans who mourn the loss of four of
our countrymen very angry. This ultimate Presidential control—the ability to
bring armed American forces to bear anywhere in the world within hours—has
existed for over 25 years. It exists precisely because of past mistakes and
embarrassing moments brought to us by various governmental agencies,
congresses, and presidents.
Since
September 11th, 2012, we have been treated to a tractor-trailer load of
misdirection, disingenuous speeches, television appearances, and outright lying
by public officials at every level of the government of the United States of
America. Now with other scandals hitting the news, we are beginning to forget
and confuse what is the only important point to know after we acknowledge and
pray for the four Americans murdered by terrorists that fateful day. There
is one simple point to be made about Benghazi: the President of the United
States is the only human being on the planet that can order a bullet, a
missile, a plane, a drone, a boat, a helicopter, a soldier, sailor, spy, or
push cart with a squirt gun attached to go into another country and perform an
aggressive action. On September 11, 2012, we know the President failed to give
that order. We don’t know where he was, what he was doing, or why he failed to
act. But we do know he failed to act, and that inaction cost the lives of four
brave Americans.
~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment