The
pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free markets and individual
liberty
"There is but one straight
course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Without True Conservatism, The Obama’s Of The World Will
Prevail by John DeMayo
Recently,
Republican Party Chairman, Reince Priebus, announced plans to spend $10 million
dollars reaching out to minority groups in a bid to attract a different group
of American voters. The Republicans also plan to begin to embrace immigration
reform and to soften the party’s stance on gay-marriage. A recent study
commissioned by Republicans concluded that the party’s electoral success hinged
on becoming more “inclusive and welcoming” of “non-traditional voters.” In
other words, the Republicans are caving, and moderate and liberal influences
are about to take over what is left of the opposition party, and conservatism
is about to be bloodied.
Apparently, the Republican Party no longer wishes to pretend
to represent “old white male” conservative voters. The people that work hard,
pay their taxes, and raise their families to love God, respect morality and
observe the law. Somehow, Republicans have come to view winning as more important than fighting
the good fight. Somehow, Republicans have come to believe that Log Cabin Republicans
and children of illegal aliens will provide for the Republican Party of
tomorrow and I resent their foolishness. It
will only cause the future defeat of their party and the further destruction of
America.
I wonder why I lost
my faith in any established political party a long time ago. They are all,
owned by “big money” influences of one philosophy or another. The
Republican and Democrat Party have both done their fair share of damage to the
U.S. Constitution and fiscal strength of our nation. Now it appears
both parties wish to destroy what is remaining of traditional American values
by setting up the old “big tent.” I have some news for Republicans. I
only vote for conservatives. Your national party has not been worth a damn
since Reagan left office. You are losing
the political fight because few of you possess the courage to tell the truth
and stand for traditional American values. You may move to the center to
accommodate your newfound homosexual constituency and the entitlement cultured
Hispanics like your competition President Obama, but in the end, you will lose the core of your party, conservatives.
Without tradition, there is nothing conservative. The
basis for Conservatism is tradition. Voting Republican does not make anyone a
conservative any more than owning a gun makes one a constitutionalist. If
conservatism fails to win the culture war reshaping our government and
political parties, we will all become a nation of indentured servants and
slaves to the coming tidal wave of immoral tolerance washing over our Republic.
Rarely do Americans
consider the long-term costs of “feel good” ideas like tolerance and social
justice. Instead of acknowledging their failures and working to correct the
damage they have caused the Republican Party is about to undertake a “rebranding”
by unfolding its “Big Tent” strategy again. A vision that includes gay
marriage, dual citizens, and the entitlement addicted. Big money influences
have laid down the law and Republican lackeys are bowing to their demands. Political
favors will not solve America problems. Respect for honored traditions by honorable
men and women will. If the Republican Party
turns its backs on conservatism, they might as well hand the government over to
the Democrats. Based upon the last 13 years there does not seem to be much of a
difference, just one failure after another. Damn these Cowards!
~~~~~
Obama's NLRB at
their worst
In just five days, Obama's National Labor Relations Board -- at the hands of National Right to Work Foundation attorneys -- have a simple question they'll be FORCED to answer before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia . . . "Why is the NLRB STILL operating as usual when the federal court ruled its members UNCONSTITUTIONAL?" Or, better yet, where are our elected leaders that are charged with the oversight of these types of agencies/boards?
In just five days, Obama's National Labor Relations Board -- at the hands of National Right to Work Foundation attorneys -- have a simple question they'll be FORCED to answer before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia . . . "Why is the NLRB STILL operating as usual when the federal court ruled its members UNCONSTITUTIONAL?" Or, better yet, where are our elected leaders that are charged with the oversight of these types of agencies/boards?
~~~~~~
Top Doc: Say Bye to Your Family Doctor When Obamacare
Hits By Bill Hoffmann
Americans may no
longer have access to their family doctors because of Obamacare, according to
Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. “By
next year more than 50 percent of all physicians in the country … will be
working either for a hospital or a hospital and health network as a salaried
employee,’’ Gottlieb told “The Steve Malzberg Show. So the idea of the
local doctor owning their practice and practicing locally — that’s going
away.’’ That’s because incentives in the Affordable
Care Act will pay physicians to practice as employees rather than to own their
own businesses, Gottlieb explained. “This is going to have some negative
ramifications for our patients,’’ he said. “They’re going to get more of their
care from hospital-owned clinics that aren’t going to have the look and feel of
the local doctors’ office.’’ Just as alarming, he added, is that doctors
“basically are just working shifts and accountability to the patient could be
lost as they get handed off from shift to shift to shift.’’ Scared yet?
~~~~~~
The frightful level of thought control in American
academia
Dr Caroline
Crocker, according to the opinions of many of her students, was an outstanding
biology teacher. She was falsely accused
of—horror of horrors—teaching creationism in class. Actually, all she had done was
point out some of the weaknesses of evolutionary theory. For this, she
was first demoted to teaching lab classes, and then—surprise—her contract was
shortened and not renewed. Her dismissal for ‘teaching creationism’ was a kiss
of death for her career. She found it
very difficult to get another teaching job. She took legal action to fight the
blatant discrimination that she had experienced, but her lawyer instead lost
his reputation for helping a Darwin-doubter. Her book is not an easy read.
There is so much detail that the reader may find it tedious. On the other hand,
the documentation given to support its claims is exhaustive. Specific events
and conversations are presented in minute detail. This work intersperses the
author’s experiences with particular biology lessons. Profuse online and
written references are included. Several appendices in the book include a
glossary, copies of emails and letters from students (names blacked out to
protect privacy), letters from faculty heads leading to Crocker’s dismissal,
letters related to the grievance process, legal documents regarding the case,
etc. The challenges of being a new
college teacher. The author describes how she became a college teacher
in biology, and how she strove to make her classes informative and interesting.
She told students who worked or had other commitments that they should not be
taking her course if they do not have the time to study for it. If they found
her policies unfair, they could withdraw from her course in favor of another
one. Lawyer Ben Stein
said it best, on the back cover of this book:
“A
chilling true life story of how free speech and free inquiry rights have simply
vanished in a large swath of the academic community. This story would be
depressing in a 1950’s Iron Curtain country. Unfortunately, it’s a contemporary
American story and far more upsetting for that reason. This shutdown of the
search for truth is not something that could happen. It DID happen.”
Dr Caroline Crocker
has founded an organization dedicated to preparing college students for careers
in science. It is called the American Institute for Technology and Science
Education (AITSE), and can be accessed online. The
kind of discrimination featured in this book will continue as long as evolutionists
can get away with it. How long before believers wake up and start
fighting back on a large scale for their rights? Book: A
review of Free to Think: Why Scientific
Integrity Matters by Dr Caroline
Crocker
Leafcutter Press, Southworth, WA, 2010
~~~~~~
Hatch: Obamacare Was Designed to Become Single-Payer
System
Sen. Orrin Hatch
(R-Utah) said Democrats set up the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as
Obamacare, to “fail” in order to establish a single-payer health care system,
“where the government controls everybody’s lives.” “Let’s
just be honest about it, the bill hasn’t triggered yet fully,” Hatch said of
Obamacare, during a press conference on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. “And
it doesn’t until the 1st of next year.” “When the young people in this country find
out that they are going to be the generation of debtors and there’s no way
they’re ever going to get out from underneath this kind of stuff—I’ve got to
tell you, people don’t even realize how crushing it’s going to be after the 1st
of this next year,” he said. “And I’ll predict that within that year—now I may
be wrong on this—but within the immediate future the Democrats are going to
throw their hands in the air and say, ‘It’s not working. It’s unaffordable.
And we have to go to a single-payer system,’” Hatch said, adding, “where
the government controls everybody’s lives.”
“That’s what’s behind all of this. And
they know it’s going to fail,” he said. “It’s already failing, and it
hasn’t even triggered yet, the big expenses.”
Honestly, you can depend upon liberals to be one thing, Dishonest!
~~~~~~
DHS Admits They Could Have Cut Costs Without Releasing
Felons
Republican members
of Congress are using hearings to hold the bureaucrats accountable for their
actions in regard the sequester and things they are doing that they are blaming
on it. While Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) exposed the Obama administration’s
duplicity on alleged cuts to pediatric vaccinations a few weeks ago,
Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC) grilled a Department of Homeland Security
Under Secretary as to why his department released ten “level 1″ aggravated
felons from federal custody, claiming it was due to sequester cuts. During the
exchange between the South Carolina congressman and DHS Under Secretary Rafael
Borras, Gowdy asked, “There was nothing
else [you] could do as a cost savings measure. Is that your testimony?” Borras
answered, “No, that is not my testimony.”
Gowdy, knowing the DHS had more than a year and a half to
prepare for sequestration, asked him anyway how long his department had to
prepare. The release of felons into the community when it would have only cost
them about $1,200 to keep them locked up is irresponsible and reckless, but
then nothing has been on the “up and up” with this administration since it
began.
~~~~~~
Evidence that America is Committing National Suicide
“If destruction be
our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen,
we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”
— Abraham Lincoln
This is the first
time I’ve seen Lincoln’s reference to national suicide. I’m more familiar with
James Burnham’s book Suicide of the West that was published in 1964. The
Cold War with Communism was in high gear in the 1960s. The Cuban Missile Crisis
was a front-page nail biter. Burnham’s book issued a stark warning to America
that went beyond failed ideology of Communism as W.J. Rayment points out:
“Burnham’s
thesis . . . was the growth of liberalism and its complete blindness to death,
cruelty and injustice perpetrated by leftist regimes. In 1964, as today, it is
very easy to see how a thinking person might see the intellectual drift to the
left as a move toward societal suicide. For liberalism is a cry for the
supremacy of general good intentions over the practical application of common
sense. Burnham said that liberals are often driven by ‘profound non-rational,
often anti-rational sentiments and impulses.’ Ideas like the welfare state and
leniency on criminals to facilitate rehabilitation may have sounded good coming
out of the mouth of a liberal, but they were disastrous in practice.
“Burnham’s book . . . was in effect a warning that
leftward drift would ultimately destroy all affluence and freedom in the
world.”
~~~~~~
Reset’: How Netanyahu Stood up to Obama–and Won
The mainstream
American media are grading President Barack Obama’s trip to Israel as a win,
after just a few hours of events and meetings. And it is a success thus
far–even without the grade inflation from the “incestuous” American press (in
the words of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu). Yet the media are missing the real story: Obama’s apparent “reset” on
Israel is a win for Netanyahu, who stood up to him–and prevailed. The most
important sign of that shift was the public green light Obama gave Israel
Wednesday to attack Iran preemptively, if necessary, to prevent it from
developing nuclear weapons:
"And
there is not a lot of light, a lot of daylight between our countries
assessments in terms of where Iran is right now. I think that what Bibi alluded
to which is absolutely correct is each country has to make its own decisions
when it comes to the awesome decision to engage in any kind of military
action….But we do have to test the proposition that this can be resolved
diplomatically. And if it can’t, then I’ve repeated to Bibi what I’ve said
publicly, and that is is that we will leave all options on the table in
resolving it."
~~~~~~
"An
elective despotism was not the government we fought for; but one in which the
powers of government should be so divided and balanced among the several bodies
of magistracy as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being
effectually checked and restrained by the others."
--James Madison, Federalist No. 58, 1788
~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment