Thursday, February 28, 2013

The Right Lane update 2.28.13



The pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free markets and individual liberty
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Biden: Chicago Election Shows Voters Want More Gun Control
Vice President Joe Biden stated yesterday that gun control enthusiast Robin Kelly’s victory in the Chicago Democrat congressional primary is a sign that voters want stricter gun control and are turning against the all-powerful gun lobby. “For the first time since Newtown, voters sent a clear unequivocal signal,” Biden told a group of state attorney generals, who were meeting in Washington. The voters sent a message last night, not just to the NRA, but to the politicians all around the country. There will be a moral price as well as a political price to be paid for inaction,” Biden said. Biden’s remarks were made to an audience of states’ attorney generals who were meeting in Washington D.C.  What he did not say was the millions of dollars of out of state and other money that  poured into the campaign.  Again, liberal spin to keep their narrative alive.
~~~~~~

~~~~~~
Denier in Chief: Obama Denies Responsibility for Prisoner Release
By the way, The Politico is saying that the White House is saying that it was Janet Napolitano’s decision to release the prisoners. “The White House and the Department of Homeland Security were unaware of Immigration Customs and Enforcement’s decision to release detainees,” until the agency announced it. So not only did Obama not do it, he didn’t even know that it was done until he read about it in the paper. Yeah. And did you know that Janet Reno was solely responsible for the Waco invasion? Bill Clinton had nothing to do with that. Janet Reno herself ordered the tanks and the military equipment into Waco at the Branch Davidian complex and torched it. Clinton said so. (Clinton impression) “You gotta ask the attorney general about that. I didn’t know anything about that ’til I saw that in the paper. In fact, I found out about it the same time you did.” And now that’s what Obama’s doing.
The White House and the Department of Homeland Security were unaware of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s decision to release illegal immigrants before sequestration until the agency announced it. So not only did Obama not do it, he didn’t know about it until he read it in the paper. See, folks, he’s not even in charge of his own Department of Homeland Security. He’s not even in charge of his own Immigration amd Customs Enforcement agency. All of this stuff happens out there, he doesn’t know anything about it. And so now Obama is going be fighting the release of these illegal alien prisoners, just like he’s fighting the Republicans who are trying to increase the number of people who don’t have jobs. And like the lies and unknown facts about Benghazi.  Had enough yet?
~~~~~~
Economics and Social Issues are Linked by Morality
The biggest excuse offered is, “Well, we don’t have the media, Rush, and they do,” and I know it’s a major factor. There’s no other way around it, it’s true. But the one thing that the Republicans are reluctant to try is draw the contrast with what liberalism is, what Obamaism is, what his intentions are. They do not effectively make the case for the alternative. Look at immigration. You know, there’s a big move on, and I told you about my golf buddy. There’s a big move on now to just totally eliminate any concern over the social issues whatsoever, because we gotta save the economy. The economy is where your kids’ future is, the grandkids’ future. And that’s exactly right. But all this stuff is interlinked.  Social issues and economic issues are linked by something, and it’s called morality. And it’s morality that’s missing here, and while Obama runs around and claims the country was founded immorally and unjustly, the truth of the matter is that they’re doing everything they can to eliminate morality. There are no guardrails. There are no limits. And there will be no judgments. Nobody has the right to say something is wrong. Nobody has the right anymore to say something is right. Nobody has the right to say something shouldn’t happen because it’s destructive and detrimental. You don’t have that right. Who you love, who you want to live with, how you want to live, where you want to get your money from the government for a job, it’s nobody else’s business.  And so morality is being eliminated, and this country was founded on the basis of it. This country was founded on the premise that if morality is ever eliminated, this country can’t exist as it was founded. Now, what is happening here? The Democrats are attempting to establish in the minds of as many Americans as possible that life itself depends on a thriving and growing government in the center of everyone’s life. That’s why there can be no cuts to it. Government in their minds MUST prevail as a replacement to our national moral compass!
~~~~~~

Sequester Means You’ll Die! by Tad Cronn
Never waste a good crisis, and if you can’t find a good crisis, make one up — Obama Administration Rule No. 1. The current “crisis” is all the sequester nonsense flying around courtesy of the White House and the lapdog media.
You’re supposed to be scared of all the horrible things the White House says will happen if the sequester goes into effect, from defense layoffs to benefit cuts to a lack of olives in the back of Sen. Harry Reid’s limousine.
Recall we had the debt-ceiling crisis, then the fiscal cliff and we’re all still alive, and Washington hasn’t stopped spending money. In fact, with the sequester approaching, amounting to a 2 percent cut in the federal budget, the feds are still hiring, adding jobs and funding new programs like there’s no national debt.
~~~~~~
Right On! Carson: Said ‘No’ to Delivering Advance Copy of Speech to White House
The White House repeatedly asked Ben Carson for his speech before the rising Republican star criticized President Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast earlier this month. Carson, a prominent neurosurgeon at Johns Hopkins University, declined to do so, noting that he doesn’t put his speeches down on paper beforehand. “I told them that I don’t have an advance copy because I don’t write out my speeches and I don’t use teleprompters …they asked more than once … I gave them the [Biblical] texts around which the remarks would be framed … I said read those texts, the remarks will be framed around those … that should have told them something,” Carson said in an interview with The Hill this week.
~~~~~~
The Tyranny of ObamaCare Continues to Unfold
According to a lawyer for the Obama Regime, the federal government has the authority to compel you to commit the most appalling crimes against your conscience — even to murder children — regardless of how grievously this would betray your religious beliefs:
The assertion came in the case of Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, a challenge to the Obama administration’s regulation requiring health-care plans to cover sterilizations, contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs.
Tyndale is a for-profit corporation that publishes Bibles, biblical commentaries and other religious works. …  As a matter of religious principle, the foundation believes that human life begins at conception and that abortion is wrong. The corporation self-insures, providing its employees with a generous health-care plan. But, in keeping with its religious faith, it does not in any way provide abortions. For this reason, Tyndale sued the Obama administration, arguing that the Obamacare regulation that would force it to provide abortion-inducing drugs and IUDs in its health-care plan violated its right to the free-exercise of religion.
In the Regime’s corner: Benjamin Berwick, a lawyer for the Civil Division of the Justice Department.
Berwick argued here — as the administration has argued in other cases where private businesses are challenging the sterilization-contraception-abortifacient mandate — that once people form a corporation to conduct business they lose their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion insofar as their business is concerned. In the face of this argument, [US District Judge Reggie] Walton asked an interesting question. His wife, a graduate of Georgetown Medical School, is a physician. She has incorporated her medical practice. Does that mean, according to the Obama administration’s argument, that the federal government can force her to act against her religious faith in the conduct of her medical practice?
Berwick’s alarming answer: Yes.
Did you think those manning the ovens at Auschwitz were working on a voluntary basis?
~~~~~~
How Will History Evaluate President Obama? - Bill O'Reilly
The question: "How will President Obama be judged in the pages of history. Will historians will pay no mind to Obama’s charisma or his legislative victories, but instead will judge him on the economy he leaves behind." Presidents like Herbert Hoover are most remembered for presiding over bad economies, and Obama will likely end up in that same historical category. In the context of the fight over sequestration, Obama has no interest in cutting any spending without pairing it with a tax increase, but the Republicans in Congress are not interested in that. Statistics showing that estimated total 2013 spending will be $3.6 trillion, but asked why spending is so large, when the economy is not improving, poverty is the same as it was fifty years ago, and salaries for working people are going down. The fact is that minorities are more in favor of a larger government than the nation at large, arguing that Obama is spending so much money because he is relying on a coalition of African-Americans, Hispanics, organized labor, and liberals that he hopes will overwhelm the Republican party.
~~~~~~
Joe Biden Has More Gun Advice: ‘Just Fire the Shotgun Through the Door’ Jason Howerton
If you prefer to be armed, Vice President Joe Biden really wants you to get a shotgun. During an online town hall event recently, Biden advised women to get a “double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun” and fire “two blasts” outside if they feel threatened by a home intruder. Well, now the vice president has some more gun advice. During an interview with Field and Stream, Biden advised gun owners to “just fire the shotgun through the door.” He also doubled-down on his claim that most people can “handle a shotgun a hell of a lot better than they can a semi-automatic weapon.”
~~~~~~
The 'Republican Sequester' Setup Obama's Real Sequester Agenda  By Mark Alexander
"He who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual..." --Thomas Jefferson (1785)



Addressing the National Governors Association this week, Barack Hussein Obama proclaimed, "At some point, we've got to do some governing. And certainly, what we can't do is keep careening from manufactured crisis to manufactured crisis." But Obama himself engineered his rapid political ascension -- from junior senator in 2005 to president of the United States in 2009 -- precisely by hopping "from manufactured crisis to manufactured crisis." Page one of his political playbook, authored by Rahm Emanuel, states: "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. ... This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not before." This unknown "community organizer" and disciple of hate, was mentored by avowed Marxists, who paved his way into the Illinois State Senate in 1997 and the U.S. Senate in 2005.

Virtually unknown, but backed by wealthy ultra-Leftists John Kerry and Teddy Kennedy, Obama won the presidential election in 2008 on a banking crisis precipitated by a manufactured mortgage crisis. He won a narrow re-election in 2012 based upon his tried-and-true manufactured classist disparity crisis. Now Obama is trying to set up his Republican opponents for a fall in 2014, based upon a manufactured "Republican sequester crisis." According to Obama:
 "Republicans in Congress face a simple choice: Are they willing to compromise to protect vital investments in education and health care and national security and all the jobs that depend on them? Or would they rather put hundreds of thousands of jobs and our entire economy at risk just to protect a few special interest tax loopholes that benefit only the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations? That's the choice. Are you willing to see a bunch of first responders lose their job because you want to protect some special interest tax loophole? ... If [Republicans] allow this meat-cleaver approach to take place, it will jeopardize our military readiness; it will eviscerate job-creating investments in education and energy and medical research."
The litany continues:
"Emergency responders -- their ability to help communities respond to and recover from disasters will be degraded. Border Patrol agents will see their hours reduced. FBI agents will be furloughed. Federal prosecutors will have to close cases and let criminals go. Air traffic controllers and airport security will see cutbacks, which means more delays at airports across the country. Thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off. Tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find childcare for their kids. Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care like flu vaccinations and cancer screenings. And already, the threat of these cuts has forced the Navy to delay an aircraft carrier that was supposed to deploy to the Persian Gulf. And as our military leaders have made clear, changes like this ... affect our ability to respond to threats in unstable parts of the world."
Despite feigning dramatic opposition to the "Republican sequester" in his national "Chicken Little" tour, both Obama and his congressional Democrat sycophants want sequestration to occur, so they can attempt to use it as a noose to hang Republicans ahead of the 2014-midterm elections. The undisputed master of deception and Demo-goguery, Obama is banking big political fortunes on the implementation of the much-debated 2.3 percent cuts to federal spending, reducing the growth of spending, not current allocations -- a plan that Obama himself hatched -- almost half of which are defense cuts.
This is precisely why Obama made Republicans an offer -- more taxes and no spending cuts -- that they can only refuse. What's that? You say you're surprised by my analysis because Republican "leaders," House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and their Beltway pundits, haven't mentioned Obama's real sequestration agenda? Well, they've been so busy taking their rebuttal queues from Obama that they missed his strategic agenda -- at their imminent peril, and that of the nation.
~~~~~~
Only 6% Rate News Media As Very Trustworthy
Most voters still get their news from television and consider the news reported by the media generally trustworthy. Fifty-six percent (56%) of Likely U.S. Voters say they get most of their news from TV, including 32% who get it from cable news network's and 24% who get it from traditional network news. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that another 25% use the Internet as their main source of news, while only 10% still rely on print newspapers. Seven percent (7%) get most of their news from radio. Fifty-six percent (56%) of all voters regard the news reported by the media as at least somewhat trustworthy, but that includes just six percent who think it is Very Trustworthy. Forty-two percent (42%) don’t trust the news media, with 12% who believe the news it reports is Not At All Trustworthy.  
~~~~~~
86% Think Fair Employers Attract Best Workers
Most Americans (86%) agree that companies that treat their employees fairly attract the best workers. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just five percent (5%) disagree, while another nine percent (9%) are not sure. Hmm.  The reason big labor is so dependent upon big government? Sounds like a bunch of pretty smart people!
~~~~~~
49% Rate Free Market Polices More Important Than Closing Income Gap
Voters rate policies that promote the free market as more important than ones that reduce the income gap between rich and poor, but Republicans and Democrats don’t see eye to eye. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 83% of all Likely U.S. Voters view economic policies that allow and encourage free market competition to be at least somewhat important, including 47% who regard them as Very Important. Just eight percent (8%) say free market-oriented policies are not very or Not At All Important.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The Right Lane update 2.27.13



The pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free markets and individual liberty
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Brewer: Release of Hundreds of Illegals Ahead of Cuts 'Height of Absurdity'  By Todd Beamon
Arizona officials — from the statehouse to Capitol Hill — were outraged on Tuesday at the Obama administration’s release of hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails to save money as huge budget cuts loom.  “I’m appalled to learn the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has begun to release hundreds of illegal aliens from custody, the first of potentially thousands to soon be freed under the guise of federal budget cuts,” said Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who has long battled the White House on immigration matters. “This is pure political posturing and the height of absurdity, given that the releases are being granted before the federal sequestration cuts have even gone into effect.” In Pinal County, about 70 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border, Sheriff Paul Babeau said that the release of hundreds of detainees over the weekend was “outrageous and unacceptable because there’s a direct and immediate impact to public safety of families in my county.”  “These are criminal illegal's,” Babeau said. “They were headed for deportation — but now, they have received a budget pardon.” A president behaving badly - like a child would when they don't get their way!!
~~~~~~
Special insurance program for the sick suspends enrollment
(Reuters) - The Obama administration on Friday said it would stop enrolling new beneficiaries in a special $5 billion insurance program for people with pre-existing medical conditions, because of rising costs and limited funding. The news comes a day after a top U.S. healthcare official told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that the administration is grappling with financial difficulties but determined to keep the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) operating in 23 states and the District of Columbia through 2013. PCIP was established in 2010 under President Barack Obama's healthcare reform law to provide coverage for sick people unable to find it in the private insurance market. The program is designed as a bridge to January 1, 2014, when legal restrictions barring discrimination over medical conditions come into force. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice on Friday saying it would suspend new enrollments beginning on Saturday to "help ensure that funds are available through 2013 to continuously cover people currently enrolled in PCIP."  "The program has a limited amount of funding from Congress," the notice added. About 100,000 current PCIP beneficiaries are not affected by the change, which follows more than two years of escalating enrollments and outlays. Twenty-seven state-run PCIPs will suspend new enrollments after March 2, HHS said.
The news underscores the financial costs involved in covering people with pre-existing conditions, including many with costly chronic diseases, as the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry prepares for sweeping reforms that analysts say could bring higher health insurance costs.  Shocking, literally shocking.  Who would have ever thought!
~~~~~~
Rand Paul on Sequestration - a little uncommon sense
You've heard the Chicken Little's in Washington, D.C. screaming at the top of their lung to scare as many Americans as possible over impending sequester "cuts."  They want you and me to believe that if federal government spending increases $2 trillion over ten years - instead of $2.1 trillion - the sky really will fall!  Bill, my U.S. Senate office just returned 20% of our budget to the U.S. Treasury - and I didn't have to let a single staffer go.  In fact, we've just put together a plan (which I've included for you below) that shows the President how he can easily implement this year's sequester cuts without incurring a single job loss.
The truth is, the sequester was the President's idea. He endorsed it. He passed it with votes from his party. Now, he wants you and me to believe sequester will result in economic Armageddon for America.
Of course, "ObamaCare" might. His outrageous spending very well could. But you and I both know a smaller INCREASE in the rate of spending growth than what the tax-and-spenders would like is not a cut.
And if President Obama would focus on eliminating government waste, there are plenty of places where he could find the money to implement sequester without losing any jobs, including:
*** Stopping the hiring of new federal employees. Our federal workforce is bloated. But we can increase efficiency without firings. In 2011, roughly 62,000 people ended their careers with the government. By not replacing people who leave, we can save hundreds of billions over ten years;
*** Bringing federal pay in line with private-sector pay. According to the Congressional Budget Office, government employees make 16 percent more than private sector counterparts. I don't believe there's any excuse for any federal employee to be making a dime more than someone in the same job in the private sector;
*** Reducing federal employee travel by 25%. Every year, the federal government spends $9 billion on federal employee travel. When many Americans are cutting back on their own travel budgets, we can certainly cut back on employee travel;
*** Focusing military research on military needs. Unfortunately, the Pentagon is not immune to waste. They even spent $5.2 million on goldfish studies to see if we could learn about democracy from goldfish;
*** Requiring competitive bidding for federal contracts. By ending laws that force the federal government to pay bloated Davis-Bacon wages and requiring bidding to take place, we can save billions;
*** Cutting taxpayer handouts to foreign countries by 50%. We spend more than $40 billion a year on foreign aid. When we're dealing with a budget crisis here at home, it's only responsible to bring this money home. This provision would eliminate half the foreign aid budget.
This roadmap I've laid out for you does implement the incredibly small sequester "cuts" without costing a single job.  I know this can be done because I've done it in my own Senate office.

~~~~~~
The President Has the Legal Power to Avoid Spending Cut Damage….So, What’s His Problem?
And when the Republicans opened the seventh seal of the sequester, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black and the stars fell unto the Earth; and our nation’s ability to forecast severe weather, such as drought events, hurricanes and tornados, was seriously undermined. Lo, and the children were not vaccinated, and all the beasts starved in the zoos, and the planes were grounded.

Or so President Obama and his Cabinet prophets have been preaching ahead of the automatic budget cuts due to begin Friday. The bit about the weather is a real quote from the White House budget director. But if any of these cataclysms do come to pass, then they will be mostly Mr. Obama’s own creation. The truth is that the sequester already gives the White House the legal flexibility to avoid doom, if a 5% cut to programs that have increased more than 17% on average over the Obama Presidency counts as doom.

According to Mr. Obama and his budget office, the sequester cuts are indiscriminate and spell out specific percentages that will be subtracted from federal “projects, programs and activities,” or PPAs. Except for the exemptions in the 2011 budget deal, the White House says it must now cut across the board regardless of how important a given PPA is. Food inspectors, say, will be treated the same as subsidies for millionaire farmers.

Not so fast. Programs, projects and activities are a technical category of the federal budget, but the sequester actually occurs at the roughly 1,200 broader units known as budget accounts. Some accounts are small, but others contain hundreds of PPAs and the larger accounts run to billions of dollars. For the Pentagon in particular, the distinction between PPAs and accounts is huge. This means in most cases the President has the room to protect his “investments” while managing the fiscal transition over time.
~~~~~~
Our Government is Worse than the Mob by Gary DeMar
When my business partner and I started Godfather Politics we had the mafia in mind. The mafia is not much different from the way our government works. When my oldest son was about four, we were at the check-out line at a Blockbuster video store when he noticed a video-tape display promoting The Godfather trilogy. “Dad, are these about God?,” he asked. A reasonable question from a four-year-old given the title and his always curious nature. Knowing that he would not care to hear a long retelling of the plot, I summed up the storyline by telling him that The Godfather saga was about an alternate form of government. The leaders are like politicians who start out caring for people but later exploit them. That was enough for him. All he could say was “Oh.”

The man standing behind us in line overheard our conversation and made the following comment. “I never thought of it that way, but you’re right. Don Corleone is a lot like today’s politicians. He’s the man in charge. He grants political favors. He makes and enforces laws. He even collects taxes. The Mafia is run like a government.” The government as a mafia regime was confirmed to me when I visited the ‘Mob Museum’ in Las Vegas. It tells the story of how crime bosses came to power in the United States.
~~~~~~
Only 41% View Economy As Fair to Those Willing to Work Hard
Most Americans may believe a middle-class lifestyle is within reach, but they still question the fairness of the economy to those who are willing to work hard. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 41% of Likely U.S. Voters think the U.S. economy is at least somewhat fair to people who are willing to work hard, while 53% disagree.
~~~~~~
Universal Preschool: Just Another Unnecessary Program From Government by Tad Cronn
President Obama’s recent push for “universal” preschool should worry parents everywhere. Not only is it an effort to further remove children’s development from the control of their parents, but there’s little reason to suggest that it could provide any real benefit to the kids. When have you ever known a government program, particularly when it comes to education, to work the way it is supposed to?
A study published in late December by the Department of Health and Human Services found not only does the government’s Head Start program, which was launched in 1965, not provide any lasting benefits, but it actually puts children behind in some ways.  The program is intended to help children from poor families prepare for school. The study commissioned by Congress evaluated 4,667 elementary school children, both those who had gone through Head Start and children from similar circumstances who had not been in the program. What the study found, or rather didn’t find, was striking.
Not only did the students not show any measurable scholastic advantage by the third grade, but they did worse in math than students who had not gone through Head Start, and they had a more difficult time with social interactions. Who's values and principles do you want your children to have?  Yours or some set determined by a group of bureaucrats?
~~~~~~
~~~~~~~
"Liberty is not to be enjoyed, indeed it cannot exist, without the habits of just subordination; it consists, not so much in removing all restraint from the orderly, as in imposing it on the violent." --Fisher Ames, Essay on Equality, 1801

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The Right Lane updated 2.26.13



The pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free markets and individual liberty
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Republicans aim to call Obama’s ‘bluff’ on spending cuts
With just four days remaining until automatic budget cuts kick in, Republicans are looking to call President Obama’s “bluff” — by giving him the flexibility to spread around the budget-ax pain in a way that would prevent the kind of fiscal doomsday his administration is predicting. The White House on Sunday evening ramped up its campaign to pressure Republicans, releasing state-by-state reports detailing the purported impact of the cuts. For days, top Cabinet officials have taken to the media to warn about the widespread damage if Congress does not agree to avert the cuts with an Obama-endorsed blend of spending reductions and tax increases. But Republicans have recently questioned whether the president might have more flexibility than he’s letting on. The $85 billion in cuts on tap for this year, they note, amounts to a little more than 2 percent of the federal budget — enough to be felt, but not enough to necessarily herald a crippling of government functions. The Pentagon would be hit disproportionately, but some hope that with a little discretion, the administration could spare the military and other departments from a devastating budget blow.
~~~~~~
Have you fallen for the "bluff" predictions and doomsday scenarios?
If you have only listened to the political class and their surrogates, you may well be frightened about going over the cliff.  However, if you have taken the time to explore other and more reliable sources, it is not going to be an Armageddon.   Sure, it will hurt.  When you cut your own budget it hurts.  Few if any of the dismal predictions by the White House and his department heads are true.  At the earliest, it will take at least a month for the cuts to take place and most Americans won't even notice. Many of the draconian employment impacts being spoken about are not true; teachers, police and fire fighters are NOT federal government employees!  Further, the House has offered to give the President the ability to modify the cuts by agency to reduce more/less to modulate the negative impacts on more vulnerable areas.   Maybe it is time to step back and actually use a bit of critical thinking.  If, as the administration claims, they are not the father/mother of the Nanny state, then these cuts should NOT hurt ones immediate welfare.  You will go to work, conduct your day as usual and pay your taxes as usual.  Another point to think about is when Federal spending doubled, did you notice a huge benefit to you?  More money in your check, lower gas prices and lower medical bills?  NO!  According to many polls the American public does not trust Washington to make the hard decisions to bring the debt and spending under control.  So sit back and relax and watch the mice scramble to "explain" why they did nothing.
~~~~~~
Most Voters Still Understand Sequester Cuts Aren’t Cuts in Current Spending
The longer and louder the political debate in Washington, D.C. gets, it seems the less voters know. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that nearly one-in-four Likely U.S. Voters (23%) now think the automatic government spending cuts scheduled to take effect on Friday will cut the current level of federal spending. That’s up six points from 17% at the beginning of this month.  Fifty-four percent (54%) recognize that the so-called sequester cuts will merely reduce the growth of future spending. That’s down slightly from 58% in early February. Twenty-three percent (23%) still aren’t sure. Propaganda works!!

45% Think Deficit Should Be Reduced By Spending Cuts Alone
A plurality of voters continues to believe spending cuts alone are the best way to reduce the federal deficit. But even among those who favor a “balanced approach” of tax hikes and spending cuts instead, half want more emphasis on spending cuts. Forty-five percent (45%) of Likely U.S. Voters think, generally speaking, that the long-term federal budget deficit should be reduced by cutting spending, according to the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Thirty-six percent (36%) think the better way to reduce the deficit is through a combination of tax increases and spending cuts. However, this includes 18% who want the combination to include more tax increases than cuts and 18% who want more spending cuts than tax hikes. Only six percent (6%) feel the deficit should be reduced by raising taxes alone. Thirteen percent (13%) are undecided.
~~~~~~
Real Defense Department Spending Up 54 Percent in 10 Years By Terence P. Jeffrey
Over the past ten fiscal years, inflation-adjusted Defense Department spending has increased by approximately 54 percent, according to Treasury Department data. Real Defense Department spending increased not only under President George W. Bush--in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and during the simultaneous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan--but also under President Barack Obama a decade after the Sept. 11 attacks and after the Iraq war had ended. In fiscal 2002, which started on Oct. 1, 2001--three weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks—Defense Department spending was $423,856,810,000 in constant 2012 dollars. Ten years later, in fiscal 2012, Defense Department spending was $650,869,000,000 in 2012 dollars. Thus, from fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2012, Defense Department spending increased by $227,012,190,000 in constant 2012 dollars—or by 53.558 percent. In fiscal 2008, the last full fiscal year before President Obama took office, Defense Department spending was $634,152,610,000 in constant 2012 dollars. In fiscal 2012, it was $650,869,000,000—an increase of $16,716,390,000. That is a real increase of 2.568 percent. (The Defense Department spending numbers cited in this article were taken from the U.S. Treasury Department's Monthly Treasury Statements and adjusted to 2012 dollars using the Bureau of Labor Statistics online inflation calculator.)
~~~~~~
Hey, Goofy Leftists: What Happened to Nations When Their Governments Did The Following?  By Rad Magnum
The one thing we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.
What happens to nations when their governments…
… rob from the rich to buy votes from the poor?
… take legal citizen’s jobs, financial security, medical care and tax dollars and use them to buy votes from illegal immigrants and bribed minorities?
… tax away incentive from the 1% responsible investors to buy votes from the 99% irresponsibly entitled?
disenfranchise, condemn and discriminate against those with traditional proven values to embrace radical change from politically correct change agents as the norm?
… policies produce more walkers than strollers emptied by government funded birth control and abortions?
… disarm individuals from self-protection to arm a private army (SS, DHS) for enforcement of executive orders?
… vote themselves the treasury, the federal reserve, unrestricted spending and tax exemptions to fund youth indoctrination camps for unscrupulous change agents (like Acorn and now Fair Share) to canvas the       country to slander opposition with big lies, propaganda, and mindless allegiance to a slanted totalitarian power base?
… train, practice and prepare for armed assaults on its own cities, farms, business, and non-combative populace?
… terminate law enforcement and military leadership that refuses to fire on their own civilian population?
… excessively fine businesses that do not share their radical views of deviant inclusivism to buy votes from fringe movements?
… spend more effort popularizing their photo ops with infatuated blind media than disaster relief with emergency services?
… buy votes with money from foreign oil (BP), foreign investment (Pakistan), foreign kickbacks and foreign America hating organizations?
… idolize a leader without a background check, while they criminalize the population by requiring background checks?
… export jobs and import foreign dependence?
… bail out bank usury, investor fraud, and wall street exploitation as they support foreclose on families and allow hoarding of the bail-out money by lenders?
… tolerate, legitimize, support and engender hatred for a selected conservative race, dissenting creed, upper class or opposing party?
… are intolerant of … and discriminate against racial majorities to pander to illegal immigrants, racial vengeance, and minority exploitation?
… finance voter fraud and cover ups?
… threaten loss of wages to steam roll uncontrolled spending?
… embrace junk fringe science bankroll public policy?
… weight statistics to support their agenda?
… approve emergency powers acts to constitutionally exercise dictatorial power without legal objection from other branches of government?
… exploit tragedy and violence as a pulpit to advance political objectives and to recruit party members willing to do the same?
… blend political acuity, deceptiveness and cunning to convert a party’s non-majority but plurality status into effective governing power?
… rewrite history to create a mythology surrounding their rise to power, countries greatness and hidden agendas.
… gain power by false promises denied by big lies, glittering generalities and fringe group appeal?
… criminalize free speech, censor the church and replace dependence on God with dependence on government?
~~~~~~
Guts to Speak the Truth About Islam  by Pete Parker
It is time to wax veracious about one of the most disturbing and chilling realities in US history: When it comes to speaking the truth about Islam – our political class just doesn’t the nerve. This gaggle of sniveling shills has demonstrated (ad nauseam) that they’d rather bestow sugary accolades upon Islam than discuss its hyper-anti-Semitic and misogynistic practices. Practices — by the way– that are profoundly rooted in Koranic dogma. In fact – it was this very class that coined the spurious (not to mention laughable) mantra that: “Islam is a religion of peace.” Truth be told – this bit of mantra will go down as the most acrid, vile and disingenuous piece of dung ever to be flumped by US politicians.   Our nation’s political class is of the expedient opinion that on 9/11 Islam was hijacked. This group mendaciously claims that 19 terrorists co-opted and twisted the “religion of peace” when they slaughtered 3,000 innocent Americans on that fateful day.   Again – this opinion is a glaring and spot-on manifestation of a total lack of guts.  To claim that Islam was “hijacked” on 9/11 is to infer that the Prophet Muhammad (Islam’s founder) was a civil and law abiding individual. This, of course, is nothing more than a craven lie constructed by our nation’s politicos who have been castrated by Allah’s rabid lapdogs (think CAIR and ISNA).  According to Islamic scholars (and narrators) – such as Jabir ibn Abdullah al-Ansari – Muhammad engaged in over 72 military campaigns to propagate Islam, via the sword. During some of his bloodiest battles (including Badr, Medina, Uhud and Mecca) he displayed his brutal anti-Semitic and misogynistic propensities by slaughtering Jews and raping women without an ounce of compunction. Subsequent to the Battle of Medina, Muhammad introduced the preferred method of killing infidels (which terrorists mimic today) when he decreed that every male of the Jewish tribe of Quraiza be beheaded.  After Muhammad’s conquest of Mecca, he declared that: “The hour {of the Last Judgment} will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone which a Jew will be hiding behind will say. O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.” Muhammad’s paradigm is one of unfettered bloodshed, mayhem and genocide. After examining his life (through the lens of Islamic scholars) — it is wholly obvious that the 9/11 terrorists did not hijack Islam, but rather followed its icon’s savage archetype. The historic account of Islam’s founder (thus Islam) is there for all to see. But, sadly – our political class has chosen to remain spinelessly reticent out of fear of being labeled Islamophobic. A fear they wouldn’t have – if they only had the guts!!
~~~~~~~
Texas Public School Students Put On Burqas, Learn That Muslim Terrorists Are ‘Freedom Fighters’
Texas Public Schools have come under fire again. This time, a teacher allegedly encouraged high school girls to dress up in full-length Islamic burqas and then instructed the entire class that Muslim terrorists are actually freedom fighters. The incident occurred in a world geography class at Lumberton High School in the small town of Lumberton, Texas. The general topic of the class that day was Islam. An unnamed student explained the teacher said, “We are going to work to change your perception of Islam.” “I do not necessarily agree with this,” the teacher also allegedly said, “but I am supposed to teach you that we are not to call these people terrorists anymore, but freedom fighters.” The controversial lesson came from a lesson plan provided by CSCOPE, an all-embracing, online K-12 educational curriculum used in 80 percent of the school districts in Texas. A rapidly growing chorus of critics charges that CSCOPE is a radical, backdoor way for progressives to circumvent both the Texas legislative process and the desires of local school boards and communities. See above!
~~~~~~
Obama Group Plans Unlimited Donations
Two of President Barack Obama’s top political strategists are behind the launch of a new liberal activist organization that will be funded by seemingly unlimited donations of $50,000 or more from “Hollywood studio executives, California energy investors and Chicago business titans,” according to the Washington Post.The move has shocked some former progressive allies of the president and represents a complete turnaround for a leader who, as candidate, once pushed for stringent campaign finance reform and strict limits on donations.  They are blasting Obama for abandon his campaign stances in favor of a group that can raise unlimited sums with limited transparency – “the very circumstances he complained about publicly in 2010 when the Supreme Court granted corporations and unions the opportunity to contribute to groups seeking to influence elections,” the Post reports.  “This is an unprecedented vehicle providing a whole new entry point for corruption by individuals and companies that may seek to buy influence with the administration,” said Fred Wertheimer, a Washington lawyer and reform advocate who is president of the organization Democracy 21, told the Post. “It will either lead to scandal or the appearance of scandal.” “This OFA idea is a terrible example of individuals and corporations being asked to pay to get access” to administration officials, added Bob Edgar, a former Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania who heads Common Cause, referring to the new group, Organizing for Action.
~~~~~~
Big Bank Bailout Rolls On: $83 Billion a Year   by Gary North
U.S. taxpayers cough up $83 billion every year for the 10 largest U.S. banks. The top five get about $64 billion. This is equal to their total profits. The public does not know this. Congress does not know this. Top bankers know this, because the story of how banks do it was published by the International Monetary Fund. There has been an article on published by Bloomberg. One short article. Do I mean the Dodd-Frank law did not eliminate this? Correct. Whenever new legislation passes Congress, it has already passed the big banks’ lawyers. These banks are considered too big to fail. All the political positioning about the sequesters of $80+ billion in fiscal 2013 are needless. The government is paying that much to the top 10 banks.
~~~~~~
Where Could We POSSIBLY Cut the Federal Budget?
If you had to cut your family’s budget, where would you cut? Would you immediately start starving your children and stop wearing shoes? Of course not. You would look at the extras in your life—whether they were coffee shop lattes, movie tickets, or restaurant meals. It’s a good thing the President wouldn’t be handling your budget. As Dan Holler of our sister organization, Heritage Action for America, has said: “If President Obama were making the decision for your family… he’d tell you to stop buying gas for your car and explain how you could only eat five days a week.” Now that President Obama has turned against sequestration, he is suggesting that spending cuts to federal agencies must result in dire consequences. Firefighters, emergency responders, and teachers will all be cut, he claims. Media outlets have played up these sob stories, copying White House releases in their local news stories and soliciting sad testimonials from people who supposedly would be affected by these cuts. See above.
~~~~~~
Jimmy Carter unloads on Obama?
Jimmy Carter knows who to blame for the world’s troubles: the United States.  Speaking Sunday in San Francisco, the former president told the Commonwealth Club, “Our country is now looked upon as the foremost war-like nation on earth, and there is almost a complete dearth now of commitment of America to negotiate differences with others.” It’s just the latest slam on the U.S. He’s also blasted staunch allies Britain and Israel, while offering words of support for America-haters Iran, Hamas, Saddam Hussein and North Korea. This time, Carter even scorched the Obama administration for its handling of the Mideast. “The United States has, you might say, zero influence either in Jerusalem or among the Palestinians, and I’m very grieved about that.” Carter also faulted Obama for being too tough on American enemies that are pursuing nuclear capabilities. Carter thinks the U.S would have more influence if it promised to drop sanctions against Iran and North Korea. And he believes talk is the answer.  Hmm!  Just because some idiot is a past president, he is an expert on today's foreign policy.  Now I get it!
~~~~~~
Why Do We Treat Prisoners Better Than Our Elderly?
“Here is some food for thought…We should place the elderly in prisons. They will get a shower a day, video surveillance in case of problems, three meals a day, access to a library, computer, TV, gym, doctor on-site, free medication if needed.”
“Put criminals in nursing homes.  They have cold meals, lights off at 7pm, two showers a week, live in a smaller room and pay rent at $4,000 a month!!!  It’s pretty sad that we treat prisoners better than the elderly.”
~~~~~~
Louis Farrakhan: Gang Members Can Serve As Protectors By Quinn Ford,
I understand and agree that subscription and registration on this site constitutes agreement to the site's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. That came at the Nation of Islam's annual Saviours' Day convention. Farrakhan, 79, renewed the call for African Americans to pool money and buy as much land as possible, in order to "control means of production" and produce food and other goods, such as clothing. Farrakhan said collectively owning land is a way for black people in America to prosper economically. The calls were part of a speech that lasted more than three hours and touched on topics including Libya's Moammar Gadhafi, U.S. Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel and a national push for gun control. Farrakhan told a crowd of more than 7,000 people at the UIC Pavilion that national lawmakers are using Chicago's violence epidemic to push for stronger gun control laws but said the Second Amendment has nothing to do with the spate of shootings in Chicago. "The guns that every one of our young people have, are they legal? No!" Farrakhan said. Instead, Farrakhan had a different idea for how to address gun violence. In addition to sending letters to black military leaders, Farrakhan said he planned to contact the city's gang leaders to recruit gang members to "protect" any land the Nation of Islam might buy in the future. "All you gangbangers, we know you love to shoot, but you're killing yourselves," Farrakhan said. "All your weapons are illegal and you're using them like savages." But Farrakhan said gangbangers are "natural soldiers" and could be taught "the science of war" to become protectors of the Nation of Islam's assets in the future. On Monday, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel weighed in on Farrakhan's gang plan. "I don't think gang members are part of public safety," Emanuel said during a news conference. "They're the problem. And it's quite clear they're the problem."
~~~~~~
Calvin Coolidge Gets New Deal in Revisionist History By Michael Barone
Calvin Coolidge began his political career during the Progressive era, a time of expanding government. But he came to national notice when that era was ending in turmoil.  It was a time of revolution in Russia and attempted revolutions elsewhere in Europe, a time of continuing war in parts of the world even after the armistice formally ended World War I.  At home, it was a time of unemployment and inflation, of bombs set off before the attorney general's house and on Wall Street, of labor union strikes in coal and other basic industries.  Coolidge was governor of Massachusetts and in charge of the Boston police when they went on strike in September 1919. The cops had legitimate grievances. But the strike was followed by nights of violence and murder, looting of department stores and shops.

Coolidge fired the striking policemen. He explained why in a telegram to labor leader Samuel Gompers. It concluded, "There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, anytime."  "The time for disruption was over; in order for the next day to be better," Shlaes writes, "law must be allowed to reign now."  Coolidge became a national celebrity. The Republican bosses in the smoke-filled room picked someone else to be Warren Harding's running mate. But the convention delegates stampeded and nominated Coolidge.  That made Coolidge president on the sudden death of Harding (who comes off much better here than in the New Deal histories) in August 1923.

Shlaes tells how he settled into a routine of meeting regularly with the director of the new Bureau of the Budget, paring down spending any way he could.  Coolidge's Republicans had small majorities in Congress, and many favored big new spending programs — veterans' bonuses, farm subsidies. Coolidge said no, with vetoes that were sustained.  At the same time, he pressed Congress for tax cuts. After Coolidge won a full term in 1924, the top income tax rate was reduced from the wartime 70 percent to 25 percent.  An economy that lurched from inflation to recession between 1918 and 1922 suddenly burst into robust economic growth.  That helped Coolidge achieve budget surpluses ever year — surpluses that he used to pay down the national debt.  In the summer of 1927, while vacationing in the Black Hills of South Dakota, Coolidge announced, "I do not choose to run for president in 1928."  
~~~~~~
"[A] rigid economy of the public contributions and absolute interdiction of all useless expenses will go far towards keeping the government honest and unoppressive."
--Thomas Jefferson, letter to Marquis de Lafayette, 1823

~~~~~~~~~~~~

ShareThis