In pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free
markets and individual liberty
"There is but one straight
course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Charity Begins With
Wealth Creation By John
Stossel
Charity — helping people who have trouble helping themselves — is a good thing two times over. It's good for the beneficiary and good for the donor, too. Stephen Post's fine book, "The Hidden Gifts of Helping," reveals that 76 percent of Americans say that helping others is what makes them most happy. Giving money makes us feel good, and helping face-to-face is even better. People say it makes them feel physically healthier. They sleep better. Private charity is unquestioningly better than government efforts to help people. Government squanders money. Charities sometime squander money, too, but they usually don't. Proof of the superiority of private over government efforts is everywhere. Catholic charities do a better job educating children than government — for much less money. New York City's government left Central Park a dangerous mess. Then a private charity rescued it. But while charity is important, let's not overlook something more important: Before we can help anyone, we first need something to give. Production precedes donation. Advocates of big government forget this. We can't give unless we (or someone) first creates. Yet wealth creators are encouraged to feel guilt. "Bill Gates, or any billionaire, for that matter," Yaron Brook, author of "Free Market Revolution" and president of the Ayn Rand Institute, said on my TV show, "how did they become a billionaire? By creating a product or great service that benefits everybody. And we know it benefits us because we pay for it. We pay less than what it's worth to us. That's why we trade — we get more value than what we give up. So, our lives are better off. Bill Gates improved hundreds of millions of lives around the world. That's how he became a billionaire." What especially offends Brook, and me, too, is stigmatizing wealth creators. The rich are made to feel guilty about making money. I sometimes attend "lifetime achievement award" ceremonies meant to honor a businessman. Inevitably, his charity work is celebrated much more enthusiastically than his business creation. Sometimes the businessman says he wants to "give back." Says Brook, "It's wrong for businessmen to feel like they need to 'give back' as if they took something away from anybody." He's right. They didn't. If we value benevolence, we must value creation.
Charity — helping people who have trouble helping themselves — is a good thing two times over. It's good for the beneficiary and good for the donor, too. Stephen Post's fine book, "The Hidden Gifts of Helping," reveals that 76 percent of Americans say that helping others is what makes them most happy. Giving money makes us feel good, and helping face-to-face is even better. People say it makes them feel physically healthier. They sleep better. Private charity is unquestioningly better than government efforts to help people. Government squanders money. Charities sometime squander money, too, but they usually don't. Proof of the superiority of private over government efforts is everywhere. Catholic charities do a better job educating children than government — for much less money. New York City's government left Central Park a dangerous mess. Then a private charity rescued it. But while charity is important, let's not overlook something more important: Before we can help anyone, we first need something to give. Production precedes donation. Advocates of big government forget this. We can't give unless we (or someone) first creates. Yet wealth creators are encouraged to feel guilt. "Bill Gates, or any billionaire, for that matter," Yaron Brook, author of "Free Market Revolution" and president of the Ayn Rand Institute, said on my TV show, "how did they become a billionaire? By creating a product or great service that benefits everybody. And we know it benefits us because we pay for it. We pay less than what it's worth to us. That's why we trade — we get more value than what we give up. So, our lives are better off. Bill Gates improved hundreds of millions of lives around the world. That's how he became a billionaire." What especially offends Brook, and me, too, is stigmatizing wealth creators. The rich are made to feel guilty about making money. I sometimes attend "lifetime achievement award" ceremonies meant to honor a businessman. Inevitably, his charity work is celebrated much more enthusiastically than his business creation. Sometimes the businessman says he wants to "give back." Says Brook, "It's wrong for businessmen to feel like they need to 'give back' as if they took something away from anybody." He's right. They didn't. If we value benevolence, we must value creation.
~~~~~~~
"The
virtues of men are of more consequence to society than their abilities; and for
this reason, the heart should be cultivated with more assiduity than the
head."
--Noah Webster, On the Education of Youth in America, 1788
~~~~~~
America has
brand-new Benedict Arnold
He single-handedly
delivered the swing vote to approve Obamacare and perhaps even crushed the
American health system that has been the envy of the world. WND has selected U.S.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. for its first-ever Benedict Arnold
Award. “There are lots of bad guys out there who would qualify as ‘Villain of
the Year,’ but precious few candidates for the ‘Benedict Arnold Award,’”
explained WND Vice President and Managing Editor David Kupelian. “Benedict
Arnold, after all, was a good guy; he was an American general in the
Revolutionary War who fought valiantly on behalf of the Continental Army – that
is, until, for reasons yet unknown, he defected to the British side and
betrayed the cause he had formerly served.”
~~~~~~
Obama Orders Pay
Raises for Congress, Federal Workers while America suffers!
President Barack
Obama issued an executive order to end the pay freeze on federal employees, in
effect giving some federal workers a raise. One federal worker now to receive a
pay increase is Vice President Joe Biden. According to disclosure forms, Biden
made a cool $225,521 last year. After the pay increase, he’ll now make $231,900
per year. Members of Congress, from the House and Senate, also will receive
a little bump, as their annual salary will go from $174,000 to 174,900. Leadership
in Congress, including the speaker of the House, will likewise get an increase.
~~~~~~~
Obama Pushing U.S.
Over ‘Cliff,’ but GOP is Real Target by Tad Cronn
President Obama on Friday said “the hour for
immediate action is here” to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff” that will
increase everybody’s taxes by letting President Bush’s tax policies die. For most people, the time for immediate action has come and gone,
but that wasn’t the real purpose of the Roadblock in Chief’s press conference
late Friday. Obama has always been OK with letting the Bush tax policies
expire. Despite all his blather about support
for the middle class, Obama loves the thought of raising taxes on everybody. In
opposing the Bush policies previously, Obama blamed them for the country’s
deficits and characterized them as an unwarranted sop to “rich” people, all as
part of his class warfare strategy of winning Democrat votes. The
orchestrated “fiscal cliff” debate is about the imminent expiration of those
cuts, which for years have helped keep down everybody’s tax rates and have
probably done more long-term stimulating of the economy than anything Obama has
ever proposed. The late-Friday press conference — time chosen to discourage
any possible response from the GOP and to dominate the weekend TV news shows —
was designed to set up the narrative of a responsible Obama making reasonable
requests of the irresponsible, upper-class-coddling Republicans. He
emphasized repeatedly that Sens. Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell were working on
a compromise to be voted on by Congress this weekend, but should that fail —
here’s the key — then Obama had ordered Reid to bring forward a “bare minimum”
bill to “cut” taxes on the middle class and extend unemployment benefits. In
other words, Obama has not given an inch and is setting up a situation where he
is daring the GOP to vote against his plan to raise taxes on small businesses
and anybody else making $250,ooo or more per year. Once that happens, Obama
will have Reid bring up essentially the same plan again for a “straight yes or
no” vote, as the president characterized it. In other words, Reid will ram
the plan through the Senate one way or another. The “Bush tax cuts” that were
so evil, according to Obama and the Democrats, will then become the “Obama tax
cuts” for the middle class, with the top end lopped off. This will put the
House Republicans in the no-win position of either rejecting a deliberately
last-minute, “bare minimum” plan to “help the middle class” or giving in to
Obama’s scheme to raise taxes on small businesses in an ongoing recession. Either way, the GOP
loses and the Imperial President wins.
~~~~~~
Sen. Graham:
Obama's Cliff Meeting 'Political Theater' By: REUTERS
President Barack
Obama and congressional leaders were to meet on Friday for the first time since
November with no sign of progress in resolving their differences over the
federal budget and low expectations for a fiscal cliff deal before Jan. 1. Instead, members of Congress are increasingly
looking at the period immediately after the Dec. 31 deadline to come up with a
retroactive fix to avoid the steep tax hikes and sharp spending cuts that
economists have said could plunge the country into another recession. "It's
feeling very much to me like an optical meeting than a substantive meeting,"
said Republican Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, noting that it was not a sign
of urgency to set a meeting for mid-afternoon with a deadline just days away.
"Any time you announce a meeting publicly in Washington, it's
usually for political theater purposes," Senator Lindsey Graham, a South
Carolina Republican, said on Thursday on Fox News.
"When the
president calls congressional leaders to the White House, it's all political
theater or they've got a deal. My bet is all political theater," said
Graham, adding that he did not believe an agreement could be reached before the
deadline.
~~~~~~
The Fiscal Cliff
Diversion
The US economy is already over the fiscal cliff and falling at
an increasing rate. Today’s economic
questions should be focused on its rate of descent; will the rate increase or
can it be arrested before the rocks below are reached. After the
election the economy has continued to implode, yet its downward plunge has been
largely ignored by the mainstream media (MSM). Apparently the MSM’s
economic orthodoxy is now only centered on fiscal cliff narratives.
The MSM’s focus on the cliff gives Obama, their hero, economic cover
since the cliff story is the economic story and not the terrible economic
results occurring weekly and monthly. Currently it is difficult to find
economic data related to the past two months (or past three years)which is
positive; whether it is meaningful growth in employment, an increase
in the labor participation rate, a consistent uptick in GDP, a reduction in the
workforce dropout rate, a reduction in government spending or a reduction in
the deficit et. al. Many fiscal
cliff narratives have incessantly talked about tax increases/decreases,
spending, debt, deficits and the intransigence of the President or the
Republicans (mainly Republicans) to compromise. With compromise a deal to
move the country forward on important economic issues can be attained.
Certainly future economic performance will be significantly affected by many of
the outcomes related to the cliff negotiations. Yet the narratives seldom mention the Obama
administration’s past or current record on economic issues…a dismal report card
that demonstrates no sustainable success on any level over the past four years.
~~~~~~
Hey Lefties! Here’s An Example Of The Need For “Assault
Rifles” by Tim Brown
OK, I used the term “assault rifles” in the
title to get your attention. Now let me explain
that I do not believe they are assault rifles. They are merely rifles capable
firing many rounds quickly. The Left gun control crowd has been saying that
there is no need for these kinds of weapons, but my friends nothing could be
further from the truth and I want to share with you just one instance that
everyone should be able to understand just how needy these weapons are. The
year was 1992, twenty years ago, when following a jury trial, four Los Angeles
Police Department officers were acquitted, in April, after being accused in the
video recorded beating of a black American named Rodney King. As a result,
people throughout the Los Angeles metropolitan area rioted over six days
because of the verdict. They engaged in idespread looting, assault, arson, and
even murder. The damage these criminals caused was well over $1 billion! The
rioting finally came to a halt after the California National Guard, along with
U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton were called in to help stop them. During
the riots, more than 60 people were killed and over 4,000 were injured. On
April 30, the second day of the riots, Korean-Americans saw the police fall
back from Koreatown, leaving them to defend themselves in the midst of heavy
looting and fires. A store owner at the time, Jay Rhee, told the Los
Angeles Times, “we have lost faith in the police.” The Times reported in May of
1992:
In the shadow of a flaming mini-mall near the corner of 5th and Western,
behind a barricade of luxury sedans and battered grocery trucks, they built
Firebase Koreatown.
Richard Rhee, owner of the supermarket on the corner, had watched as
roving bands of looters ransacked and burned Korean-owned businesses on
virtually every block.
But here, it would be different. “Burn this down after 33 years?” asked
Rhee, a survivor of the Korean War, the Watts riots and three decades of
business in Los Angeles.
“They don’t know how hard I’ve worked. This is my market and I’m going to
protect it.”
From the rooftop of
his supermarket, a group of Koreans armed with shotguns and automatic weapons
peered onto the smoky streets. Scores of others, carrying steel pipes, pistols
and automatic rifles, paced through the darkened parking lot in anticipation of
an assault by looters. “It’s just like war,” Rhee said, surveying his
makeshift command. “I’ll shoot and worry about the law later.” From tiny
liquor stores in South-Central Los Angeles to the upscale boutiques in
Mid-Wilshire, Korean store owners have turned their pastel-colored mini-malls
into fortresses against the looter’s tide. For many store owners, the riots have
become a watershed in the struggle for the survival of their community. The
store owners shot off at least 500 rounds into the sky and ground to break up
masses of people that were looting. They could have only accomplished that with
the types of weapons they were using.
~~~~~~
Feinstein Assault
Weapons Ban Covers Rifles, Pistols and Shotguns
The New Year is
just around the corner and although the Senate still hasn’t made a fiscal cliff
deal, Senator Diane Feinstein already has parts of new gun control legislation
ready to go. Two Sunday’s ago on NBC’s Meet the Press, Feinstein talked about
giving President Obama a bill he can “lead on” and used the term assault weapon
loosely. Feinstein has posted a summary of what the legislation will cover,
which includes a ban on semi-automatic handguns and shotguns in addition to
rifles. The legislation also requires registration of previously purchased
guns. If passed, ATF would be in charge of enforcement which should be a huge
concern to gun owners.
~~~~~~
Krauthammer: Obama
Using Cliff to Start GOP 'Civil War' By: Dan Weil
President Barack Obama has been winning the
public relations battle so far in his dispute with Republicans over the fiscal
cliff, but the GOP will come out on top if there’s a cliff dive, says
syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer. Perhaps the
biggest area of disagreement between the two sides is over raising taxes on the
wealthy. House Speaker John Boehner was willing to accept such an agreement, as
insisted upon by Obama. But the Republican House conference rebelled against
that idea last week. As for the president, “he’s been using this, with ruthless
skill to fracture and basically shatter the Republican opposition,” Krauthammer
told Fox News on Thursday. “His objective from the very beginning was to break
the will of the Republicans in the House and to create an internal civil war.
He’s done that.” But Republicans should realize they’re playing from a position
of strength Krauthammer says. "I think the Republicans will surely have
a much stronger hand [if] we go over the cliff, assuming Obama stays very hard
line and offers only humiliating conditions,” he said. Obama’s need for
congressional approval to raise the debt ceiling and thus avoid default early
next year gives Republicans leverage, Krauthammer says. “With bravado, he
[the president] says 'Oh, that's a game I won't play.' He has to play, he's the
president." Both parties have something to gain from a jump off the cliff,
according to Politico. Republican congressmen can tout their opposition to tax
increases and avoid primary threats from the right. And Democrats can say they
fought tax reductions for the rich and entitlement cuts.
~~~~~~
64% Believe in God
of the Bible
Two-out-of-three Americans (64%) believe in
the God of the Bible. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey also
finds that 12% do not believe in God at all. Eleven
percent (11%) believe in some form or essence of God, five percent (5%) in some
other form of God, and eight percent (8%) are not sure. Those who do not
believe in God are evenly divided as to whether or not believers are foolish:
42% say they are, but 42% disagree. Among those under 40, just 53% believe in
the God of the Bible. That figure is 70% for those aged 40-64 and 73% for
senior citizens. Women (68%) are a bit more likely to believe in the
Biblical God than men (60%).
No comments:
Post a Comment