In pursuit of Constitutionally grounded governance, free
markets and individual liberty
Information you can use
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sponge Alert: Obama
Voters Love Socialism
Conn Carroll- According to a December 2011 Pew Foundation study, while
60 percent of Americans view socialism negatively, a plurality of Americans
ages 18 to 29 (49 percent to 43 percent) and a majority of African-Americans
(55 percent to 36 percent) view socialism positively. Conversely, while a
majority of Americans view capitalism positively (50 percent), again a
plurality of Americans ages 18-29 (47 percent) and a majority of
African-Americans (51 percent) view it negatively. Today, Gallup released a new
poll confirming what Pew already found: Obama’s Democratic base loves
socialism. Just look at this chart:
~~~~~~
Separation of
Church and State?
We have been
bombarded with the notion that the public MUST be protected from Christian
public displays and acts of faith. It
now appears that Christians need protection from the Sate!
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who is Catholic, indicated
on Friday that she supports forcing St. Mary’s Medical Center, the oldest
continuously operating hospital in her San Francisco-based congressional
district, to provide health plans to its workers that cover sterilizations,
contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs free of charge even though the
Catholic faith says this Catholic hospital may not do so because these things are
intrinsically immoral. “We are committed to furthering the healing ministry of
Jesus,” says the hospital’s mission statement. Health and Human Services
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius–who, like Pelosi, is Catholic–issued the
sterilization-contraception-abortifacient mandate as a regulation under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, AKA Obamacare.
~~~~~~~
Be Serious, Not
Cavalier, In Holding To Your Commitments
In his book "They Call Me Coach", legend John Wooden tells
of being offered head basketball coaching positions at two top schools -- the
University of Minnesota and UCLA. Having made his final decision, he
set up phone calls, an hour apart, with both Athletic Directors, to announce
his choice. The AD at Minnesota -- the school to which Wooden planned to
accept -- missed his scheduled 6 pm call, and the AD from UCLA was right on
time at 7. So Wooden accepted at UCLA. A short while later when
the Minnesota AD finally called, Wooden gave him the news. He was
asked to reconsider, to un-do the deal, but wouldn't. His commitment to
UCLA -- his second choice -- made only minutes earlier -- was final. What would
you have done? Several years ago, good friends of mine made an offer
on a beautiful home for sale, and it was accepted by the owner. Shortly
thereafter, they learned a second buyer knocked on the owner's door and beat
the deal by offering more than the asking price. The owner didn't take
it. He called to say "Don't worry, I turned it down. You and I
have a deal." What would you have done? Two stories of integrity,
in which people honored a deal they made over a better one that came
later. Neither should be noteworthy -- that's how commitments are
supposed to be treated. But sadly, far too many people are cavalier about
commitments, treating them more like 'maybes' than firm promises. Don't
even get me started on politicians.
~~~~~~
What if Obama gets
the tax increases he wants?
We will have enough money to operate the government for EAIGHT DAYS. What more do you need to know. It is a symbolic gesture to the liberal base that wants to punish, not make true progress.
We will have enough money to operate the government for EAIGHT DAYS. What more do you need to know. It is a symbolic gesture to the liberal base that wants to punish, not make true progress.
~~~~~~
Obama: 'Insider
threat.' -- columnist Doug Hagmann
"On the day before Thanksgiving, Barack Hussein Obama issued a
Presidential Memorandum, or an unofficial directive to the heads of departments
and agencies under the executive branch. This Presidential Memorandum, the text
of which is only 183 words, directs agency and department heads to establish a
program 'to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent
a threat to national security.' ... [T]here appears to be a deliberate lack of
specificity concerning the exact elements that constitute such an 'insider
threat.' ... The key to understanding this memorandum is to understand that we
are witnessing the greatest consolidation of power and control under the
Executive branch of the government in recent U.S. history. This consolidation
of power makes it possible for a select number of highly political 'czars' and
appointed officials to observe, control and report on the activities of people
within their various departments to the Executive branch. ... It's no longer
about the rule of law and one's allegiance to the United States. It's now about
allegiance to the agenda of the Executive branch, assured by active
surveillance of government employees by Obama's hand-picked appointees."
~~~~~~
Voters Think Obama
More Willing to Deal on ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Than GOP
As the “fiscal cliff’ draws nearer, voters are more confident that
President Obama is willing to agree to a deal with both spending cuts and tax
increases than Republicans in Congress are. A new Rasmussen Reports national
telephone survey finds that 42% of Likely U.S. Voters believe the president
is willing to accept a deal that includes both his tax increases and
significant cuts in government spending. Nearly
as many (40%) think Obama will insist on tax increases only.
~~~~~~
48% Recognize Need
to Cut Entitlements, Defense to Reduce Federal Deficit
Recognition is growing among voters that reducing the deficit will
require cuts in both defense and entitlement programs like Social Security and
Medicare.
~~~~~~
Men Find Careers in
Collecting Disability By Michael Barone
Americans are very generous to people with disabilities. Since passage of
the Americans With Disabilities Act in 1990, millions of public and private
dollars have been spent on curb cuts, bus lifts and special elevators. The idea
has been to enable people with disabilities to live and work with the same ease
as others, as they make their way forward in life. I feel sure the large
majority of Americans are pleased that we are doing this. But there is another
federal program for people with disabilities that has had an unhappier effect.
This is the disability insurance (DI) program, which is part of Social
Security. The idea is to provide income for those whose health makes them
unable to work. For many years, it was a small and inexpensive program that few
people or politicians paid much attention to. In his recent book, "A
Nation of Takers: America's Entitlement Epidemic," my American Enterprise
Institute colleague Nicholas Eberstadt has shown how DI has grown in recent
years. In 1960, some 455,000 workers were receiving disability payments. In
2011, the number was 8,600,000. In 1960, the percentage of the economically
active 18-to-64 population receiving disability benefits was 0.65 percent. In
2010, it was 5.6 percent. More.....
~~~~~~
Obama Pushing New
Cap-and-Trade Tax Plan as Fiscal Cliff Talks Stall - What?!
As leaders in Washington
obsess about the fiscal cliff, President Barack Obama is putting in place the
building blocks for a climate treaty requiring the first fossil- fuel emissions
cuts from both the U.S. and China. State Department envoy Todd Stern is in Doha this week working to clear
the path for an international agreement by 2015. While Obama failed to
deliver on his promise to start a cap-and-trade program in his first term, he’s
working on policies that may help cut greenhouse gases 17 percent in 2020 in
the U.S., historically the world’s biggest polluter. Obama has moved
forward with greenhouse-gas rules for vehicles and new power plants, appliance
standards and investment in low-emitting energy sources. He’s also called for
80 percent of U.S. electricity to come from clean energy sources, including
nuclear and natural gas, by 2035. “The president is laying the foundations for
real action on climate change,” Jake Schmidt, who follows international climate
policy for the Washington-based Natural Resources Defense Council, said in an
interview in Doha. “Whether or not he decides to jump feet first into the
international arena, we’ll see.” Envoys from more than 190 nations are entering
their second week of talks today at the United Nations conference working
toward a global warming treaty. Their ambition is to agree to a pact in 2015
that would take force in 2020. It would supersede limits on emissions for
industrial nations under the Kyoto Protocol, which the U.S. never ratified.
~~~~~~
GOP Demands Deep Spending Cuts as Debt-Ceiling Fight Looms
Republicans
are renewing attempts to use a debt-limit increase to force deeper spending
cuts, replicating the 2011 showdown that caused the U.S. to come within days of
default and led to a credit-rating downgrade. As in 2011, many Republicans in
Congress see the need to raise the $16.4 trillion limit on public debt in early
2013 as leverage to force President Barack Obama to cut entitlement programs
such as Medicare and Medicaid. House
Republicans view the U.S. budget deficit, which topped $1 trillion in each of
the past four years, as a crisis requiring immediate action. “There has to
be a reality out there that says we are in serious trouble,” said
Representative Tim Walberg, a Michigan Republican. “We can’t just keep raising
it because it’s been traditional to do it.” The prospect of another
debt-ceiling showdown is complicating the stalled talks to prevent more than
$600 billion of spending cuts and tax increases from taking effect in January.
Republicans, who say they didn’t suffer politically from the 2011 fight, are
reprising their tactics. The administration wants to include a debt limit
increase in a fiscal cliff deal and prevent Congress from wielding default as a
weapon in the future. Talks on averting
the fiscal cliff are at a standstill. Democrats continue to demand higher tax
rates for top earners, while Republicans want to cut spending on entitlements
and other programs. Continue Reading ...
~~~~~~
Helping the Poor
and Addicted Turn Their Lives Around
Strong
marriage and family relationships are crucial to fighting poverty. This was the
message shared by grassroots leaders at an anti-poverty conference sponsored by
The Heritage Foundation and the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise this past
September. These leaders shared firsthand experience and common-sense intuition
about poverty reduction. They explained what sociological research and data
continually underscore: that the intact family is the greatest weapon against
child poverty, high-risk behavior, delinquency, and lower academic achievement.
Among the attendees was Bishop Shirley Holloway, who has created three
facilities for homeless men, women, and families. Many of those who find their
way to her door are hardcore alcoholics and drug addicts. Holloway describes
her work as providing “individuals that society has cast aside” with the
“building blocks” to restore their lives. The
root of addiction was summarized at the conference by Roman Herrera of the San
Antonio-based Outcry in the Barrio ministry: “We live in a fatherless
society…and there will always be a hole in a heart where that relationship is
missing.” Government at all levels should take its cue from the wisdom of
grassroots leaders’ firsthand experience, and support policies to promote and
strengthen marriage. In addition, government
should ensure that it does not hinder the work of grassroots leaders. While
a social safety net may be able to provide short-term material relief,
addressing deep-rooted human need is another matter. The relational work of organizations such as House of Help/City of Hope
can have dramatic effects in healing broken relationships and thereby helping
to cure a significant contributor to poverty.
~~~~~~
Barefoot man handed
boots in viral NYPD video shoeless again
But
what of the shoeless man? For days, his
bare feet — blistered and battered — were well known. Yet precise details about
him proved elusive. His name is Jeffrey Hillman, and on Sunday night, he was
once again wandering the streets — this time on the Upper West Side — with no
shoes. The $100 pair of boots that Officer DePrimo had bought for him at a
Skechers store on Nov. 14 were nowhere to be seen. “Those shoes are hidden. They are worth a lot of money,” Mr. Hillman
said in an interview on Broadway in the 70s. “I could lose my life.” Mr.
Hillman, 54, was by turns aggrieved, grateful and taken aback by all the
attention that had come his way — even as he struggled to figure out what to do
about it.
~~~~~~
Sheila Jackson Lee:
‘Who Wants to Make a Fuss About Social Security When It's Solvent?' By Elizabeth Harrington
Another
idiot from the fringe! Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) says entitlements such
as Social Security and Medicare are not an issue, when it comes to the fiscal
cliff: “Who wants to make a fuss about Social Security when it's solvent?” she
asked on Friday. “And then who wants to make a fuss about Medicare when it's
solvent until 2024?” Social Security will exhaust its trust fund reserves in
2033. However, according to an
April 2012 report from the Social Security and Medicare Board of Trustees, in
2010-2012 the entitlement program ran deficits for the first time since 1983,
meaning that payroll taxes fell short of benefit payouts. “Social Security’s
expenditures exceeded non-interest income in 2010 and 2011, the first such
occurrences since 1983, and the Trustees estimate that these expenditures will
remain greater than non-interest income throughout the 75-year projection
period,” the report said. “Redemption
of trust fund assets from the General Fund of the Treasury will provide the
resources needed to offset the annual cash-flow deficits.” In other words,
Social Security must dip in to the Treasury’s General Fund – which is already
running a deficit – to make up the difference between the benefits promised to
retirees and the taxes it collects from current workers.
~~~~~~
Grand Canyon: How
Do You Get a River Over a Mountain? By
David Coppedge
One
would think that the Grand Canyon, one of earth’s most prominent geological
features, studied by geologists for 140 years, would be well understood.
Wrong. That’s how Joel Pederson (Utah State) began the cover article
in GSA Today this month,1 a bimonthly
journal of the Geological Society of America. The mystery he investigated
is how the Colorado River ran over a mountain: the Kaibab uplift. The Kaibab
uplift is the broad southern end of the Colorado Plateau through which the
Grand Canyon has been carved. Rivers do not normally flow uphill.
The upper Colorado River, roaring from Rocky Mountain snow melt, faces this
obstacle; yet here the Grand Canyon cuts right into the plateau at a steep
monocline that extends north-south through Utah, and manages to run westward
through the high province till merging from the Grand Wash Cliffs at the west
edge of the plateau. There, at modern Lake Mead, the river suddenly
enters the Basin and Range province of Nevada. It flows onward to the
southwest, emerging at the Gulf of California (a nice tour to take in Google
Earth). Another example of beware when
you read "Experts say....."
~~~~~
Liberal Compares
Obama’s Push for Tax Hikes to Lincoln Wanting to End Slavery by Gary DeMar
On
an NPR
broadcast, E. J. Dionne and David Brooks were discussing the “fiscal cliff”
that we may or may not go over. Dionne, an op-ed writer for the uber-liberal Washington
Post, compared President Obama’s resolve in pushing for more taxes to
Abraham Lincoln who “stood his ground on the fundamental principle that we
needed the 13th Amendment and needed to ban slavery.” In the Lincoln-Douglas debates, Lincoln stated that every person has
the natural right “to eat the bread which he has earned by the sweat of his
brow.” While this phrase was not unique to Lincoln, nevertheless, he was
right.
Income is the result of
people working or investing. Taxation takes some of that hard-earned money.
Some taxes are necessary and equitable; most are not. For example, the gasoline
tax is equitable and does not violate the 13th Amendment since the money
(supposedly) goes to build roads and bridges that we travel on. If we don’t drive, we don’t pay the
tax that’s levied on every gallon of gasoline sold. Of course, the tax is paid
by people who don’t drive but in an indirect way. Goods and services that
travel over roads have the cost of fuel built into the price of those goods or
services (e.g., repairmen, UPS and FedEx deliveries, etc.). No involuntary
servitude is in view. But in terms of
taxation as a form of wealth redistribution, taxation is a form slavery. Money
is taken from people who work and then given to people who don’t work. More than 6000,000 Americans died to end that form of
wealth distribution, so it’s rather remarkable that Mr. Dioone would
make such an outrageous comparison.
~~~~~~
Hillary Clinton
Displays Ignorance and Insults Israel by
da Tagliare
Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton spoke at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy this
past Friday. She started out by praising Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu. Then she said something that showed complete lack of
understanding of the nation and people of Israel.
Clinton
said: “I’m not making excuses for the missed opportunities of the Israelis, or
the lack of generosity, the lack of empathy that I think goes hand-in-hand with
the suspicion.” “So, yes, there is more that the Israelis need to do to really
demonstrate that they do understand the pain of an oppressed people in their
minds, and they want to figure out, within the bounds of security and a Jewish
democratic state, what can be accomplished.”
I’m
not Jewish, but I feel insulted by her statements. Does Clinton not know
anything about the history of Israel? Does she not know that they fought
long and hard to become a nation. Does she not understand that every
nation that surrounds Israel has not only threatened to annihilate the Jewish
people, but most of them have promised to do so? Does she not understand
that the 6 Day War was not started by Israel, but the small nation did end it with
a decisive victory over their enemies? Does she not understand how
important the city of Jerusalem is to the Jewish people? Obviously, Clinton has no concept of what the Israeli people have
endured when she said they lacked generosity and empathy for the Palestinians
who continually vow to wipe the Jewish people off the face of the earth.
In lieu of her ignorant and thoughtless comments, I’m glad that Clinton is
resigning from her position as Secretary of State. I only hope and pray
that whoever Obama appoints to take her place will have a little bit more
knowledge and understanding of Israeli history, but with Obama’s Muslim
affinity, I doubt the next Secretary of State will be any better.
~~~~~~
A
popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it,
is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance:
And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the
power which knowledge gives -
James Madison, letter to W.T. Barry, August 4, 1822
No comments:
Post a Comment