Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Obama Is Campaigning for Republicans

Obama Is Campaigning for Republicans

To the chagrin of Democrats everywhere, Barack Obama recently said his policies were on this year's ballot. Now the narcissist in chief has again placed himself front and center in this election. 

On Al Sharpton's MSNBC show, he said of embattled Democrat senators, "The bottom line is, though, these are all folks who vote with me -- they have supported my agenda in Congress." Translation: A vote for those senators is a vote for Barack Obama. 

Never mind politicians like Alison Lundergan Grimes, who can't even say if she voted for the man. Obama understands it's all politics. "This isn't about my feelings being hurt," he continued. "These are folks who are strong allies and supporters of me. And I tell them, I said, 'You know what, you do what you need to to win. I will be responsible for making sure that our voters turn up.'" Whose voters? Because Obama just gave Republicans the best fodder for a get-out-and-vote ad conservatives could ever hope for

Monday, October 20, 2014

Poor performance needs to be punished.


Poor performance needs to be punished.


And it’s time to send Democrats their pink slip.

You have been asked to speak up before, but the truth is this: it’s different this time.

  • Can you afford the cost of executive amnesty? 
  • Can you afford six more years of low wages and high unemployment?
  • Can you afford another decade of American foreign policy leading from behind?
  • Can you afford a second Clinton administration in 2016?
  • Can you afford more of the Democrats sitting on critical legislation in the Senate?
  • Can you afford Obama appointing more extreme leftist into key positions including the courts?

If you answered “no” to any of the above, then you cannot afford to be silent.



Vote Red in November!
 

Twitter Transparency: Company Sues U.S. Government Over Data Request Disclosures : All Tech Considered : NPR

Twitter Transparency: Company Sues U.S. Government Over Data Request Disclosures : All Tech Considered : NPR

Shock Report! Government Wastes Huge Amount of Taxpayer Dollars

Shock Report! Government Wastes Huge Amount of Taxpayer Dollars

 by Onan Coca 

The federal government wastes most taxpayer dollars, not only by making poor or fraudulent spending decisions, but also by funding inefficient entitlement programs and unnecessarily redistributing wealth, argues Heritage Foundation budget economist Romina Boccia.

“Any Social Security check going to a millionaire, I call that government waste,” Boccia told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “If we decide that the government has a role to protect the elderly and disabled from destitution, if we think that a federal role is required there, then sending Social Security checks to millionaires is a waste.”

Much attention is given to wasteful discretionary spending on things like completely unnecessary bridges or lavish parties for bureaucrats, and a 2014 Gallup poll showed Americans believe the government wastes 51 cents of every dollar, Boccia points out in her new report, titled “Eliminating Waste and Controlling Government Spending.” But in terms of economic principles, most of that waste happens in the realm of mandatory spending on programs like Social Security and Medicare.
Mandatory spending now consumes two-thirds of the federal budget, and by 2030 Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and U.S. interest payments will consume 100 percent of tax revenues, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

“Paying government benefits to people who shouldn’t receive them, and creating bad incentives for people to work less and retire earlier — that is really what we think of as waste,” Boccia told TheDCNF. “The baby boomers who don’t need their Social Security checks still take them, and they’ll live off of them, and they’ll just leave a greater inheritance to their children, who are also well off.”
She also pointed to massive waste in Medicare and Medicaid spending.  ”If we want to provide health care for these people, it doesn’t mean that the government has to provide it,” Boccia said. Rather than insist the government finance and provide health care to the elderly, for example, she suggests giving them a check and allowing them to purchase health insurance in the relatively efficient private market.

Medicare and Medicaid have the highest rates of “improper payments.” Last year the federal government reported over $100 billion of improper payments to the programs, including overpaying for medical equipment and paying benefits to dead people.

“Miss-targeted and poorly run entitlement programs have for years driven and continue to drive the increase in federal spending and debt,” Boccia said. “And if we include that then it makes sense that you might think that the government wastes most of the dollars it takes in.”

“Instead of just thinking about mismanagement, fraud, and stupid spending examples like RoboSquirrel,” she added, “we really ought to look at a definition of government waste that is based on economic principles.” 

Hebrew - The Holy Tongue

Holy Tongue

By Mordechai Schiller

Not all languages are created equal. There is one language apart from all others.
Hebrew is called "Lashon Hakodesh" — the Holy Tongue. There are some who might dismiss this as just pious Heb-perbole. But you don't have to be pious — or Jewish — to know that Hebrew is special.

Personally, I have no problem with axiomatically quoting the Torah. We hold its Truth to be self-evident. As an old bumper sticker put it: "G-d said it. I believe it. That settles it!" But, for the cynics, skeptics, and others absolutely sure of their uncertainty, rather than beg the question by jumping right into quoting the Torah to prove its own specialness, let me start with a venerated secular source: the Oxford English Dictionary (OED).

The word "Ivri — Hebrew," means otherness. According to the OED, the etymology of the English word Hebrew is:
"Middle English Ebreu, from Old French Ebreu, Ebrieu (nominative Ebreus, 12th cent. in Hatzfeld & Darmesteter), from medieval Latin Ebrus for classical Latin Hebræus, from Greek Hebraios,from Aramaic 'ebrai, corresponding to Hebrew ibr? 'a Hebrew,' lit. 'one from the other side (of the river)'; from '?ber the region on the other or opposite side; from '?bar to cross or pass over.)"
Eons before Oxford, the Midrash explained why the Torah calls Abraham "ha'Ivri — the Hebrew." The word Ivri is related to the word eiver, meaning "on the other side." The Midrash explains that Abraham was unfazed by standing alone in his beliefs. "The whole world stood on one side and he stood on the other."

Could Thoreau have known this Midrash? In his essay, On the Duty of Civil Disobedience, Thoreau wrote that Abolitionists should withdraw support for the government of Massachusetts and
 "not wait till they constitute a majority of one, before they suffer the right to prevail through them. I think that it is enough if they have G-d on their side, without waiting for that other one. Moreover, any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one already."
Shortly after my brother Rabbi Nota Schiller (dean of Ohr Somayach in Jerusalem) got married, he moved to Israel. Before he left, he went to take leave of, Rabbi Yitzchok Hutner, zt"l, the late dean of Yeshiva Chaim Berlin.

Rabbi Hutner told my brother, "When we make a l'chaim toast for a yahrtzeit, we say, 'May the neshamah have an Aliyah [May the soul rise to a higher level in Heaven].' Now, I say to you, may your Aliyah [ascension to live in Israel] have a neshamah [soul]!"

In the course of the conversation, my brother mentioned that he was concerned about adapting to a new language. Given his lifelong involvement in writing and communication, he was afraid he wouldn't be able to fully express himself, writing in Hebrew.

Rabbi Hutner told him that people can readily learn to write in a new language. "But nobody," he said, "writes poetry in an adopted language."

Poetry, he explained, is too profoundly connected to our primal emotions. "There is one exception, though," the sage said, "A Jew from any country can learn to write poetry in Lashon Hakodesh; because Lashon Hakodesh is every Jew's first language."

Still pondering Rabbi Hutner's premise that no one writes poetry in an adopted language, my brother asked, "But what about Joseph Conrad?" (Conrad was a Polish immigrant, and one of England's greatest lyrical novelists.) Rabbi Hutner countered, "That is not poetry; that is prose." Apparently, Rabbi Hutner felt that — no matter how poetic — prose couldn't be verse.


A horse of a different color
Hebrew is the language of Creation: The Mishnah in Ethics of the Fathers tells us "that "the world was created with 10 utterances." The Divine created the universe using one set of tools: Hebrew words.

The Torah says Adam called his wife ishah (woman) because "she was taken from ish [man]." The foremost commentator, Rashi, explains, based on the Midrash, that this derivation teaches us that "The world was created with Lashon Hakodesh — the Holy Tongue — Hebrew."
Adam later "called his wife 'Chavah' [Eve] because she was to be mother of all chai [life]." The name Adam itself comes from the Hebrew word adamah [earth], because G-d created Adam from the earth.

A Horse is a horse, of course. But is it, really? The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) says the etymology of horse is: "hors = Old Frisianhors, hars, hers (Frisian hoars), Old Saxon hros (Middle Low German ros, ors, Middle Dutch ors, Low German and Dutch ros), Old High German hros, ros, Middle High German ros, ors, German rosz, all neuter, Old Norse hross masculine; not recorded in Gothic. The affinities of the word outside Germanic are uncertain. …"

In other words, nobody knows for sure. So, "You pays your money and you takes your choice." Or, as Mark Twain said, "It is difference of opinion that makes horse-races."
On the other hoof, the Hebrew word sus is a horse of a different color. The Torah says that the Divine brought all the animals before Adam, "…and whatever the man would call each living creature — that was its name."

Adam didn't "give" the animals names. He prophetically connected with the spiritual essence of each animal and called it by its name. Thus, the Hebrew word sus isn't a mere label. It definitively identifies the creature we call a horse.

More to the point, all other languages are nothing more than collections of arbitrary sounds that enough people got together and agreed on to refer to a specific object.

In our case, that object is a mammal that has hooves, pulls loads, runs races and helped win the West. All things being equine, there is no intrinsic meaning to the juxtaposition of phonemes riding on horse. Since Hebrew is the language of Creation, by corollary, it is the language of prophecy.

As my brother said, "In prophecy, there is an absoluteness to diction and syntax. We scramble to catch the bobbing and weaving sparks of holiness hidden elsewhere. Yet the phrase 'V'romamtanu mikol ha'leshonos — He lifted us above all other tongues' — means just that." And so, only Hebrew is "Lashon Hakodesh — the Holy Tongue."

When I was a rabbinical student at the Beth Medrash Gevoha in Lakewood, NJ., I would sometimes spend lunchtime in the yeshivah library, reading Sefer HaCarmel — a dictionary/thesaurus based on the commentary of the Malbim (d. 1879).

The Malbim wrote in the introduction to his commentary on the book of Isaiah that the Jewish prophets never used two different words to mean the same thing.

There are no "synonyms" in Hebrew. That is, there are no interchangeable words. Each word is precise and essential. In his commentary, he defines seeming synonyms explaining the fine differences in meaning.

Yehuda Leib Gordon, the poet (d. 1892), and Pinhas Rutenberg (founder of the Israel Electric Corporation) were both irreverent enough to name electricity for an angel in Ezekiel's vision: "Chashmal."

It is ironic that the fathers of Modern Hebrew couldn't come up with a more creative word in Ivrit for Alexander Graham Bell's "harmonic telegraph" than telefon.


Lamentably, Modern Hebrew continues to deteriorate. How sad that the glut of Western media led to Israelis giving up "Shalom" for "Bye." But there is still hope. The OED says the etymology of "goodbye" is "A contraction of the phrase G-d be with you"!

Friday, October 17, 2014

Why A Senate GOP Majority Can Make All The Difference

Why A Senate GOP Majority Can Make All The Difference

By DICK MORRIS



As Republicans close in on a Senate majority, the question looms: What difference would it make?  With the White House still at the ready to veto anything the GOP Congress passes, is not a Republican Senate merely another formulation likely to trigger gridlock in Washington?

No!  Control of the Senate can be the key to pushing back Obama's goal of creating a nation ruled by one dominant party in perpetuity, which I discuss in my new book Power Grab.

Control of the Senate hands the Republicans control over the budget.  If they overreach and try again to hit a grand slam by zero funding ObamaCare, they will strike out as they did in October of 2013.  Obama will simply veto the budget, let the government shut down, and blame the Republicans.  We already know how that will turn out -- a bit GOP loss.

But if the Republicans use their Senate majority to play small ball and make limited but very important advances, they can use their budgetary power to achieve great ends.

Because Congress has the ability to vote on each line of the budget while the President, lacking the line item veto, can only sign or veto the whole thing, Republicans can advance their agenda one line at a time.  Each advance would be important, but they would not rise collectively to enough to justify a presidential veto and a government closure.

For example:

•  Republicans can attach to the Homeland Security budget a requirement of a quarantine banning all travelers who have recently been to an Ebola-afflicted nation from coming into the United States.

•  They could insert in the ICE budget language overriding the President's coming executive order ending deportations.

•  They could put in the HHS budget provisions killing the death panel (Medicare Payment Advisory Board) and the excise tax on medical devices.

•  They can include language Senator Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) has gotten in the current budget banning enforcement of the Small Arms Limitation agreement signed by the US at the urging of the UN.

By this "small ball" strategy of using the budget to effect important but limited modifications in Obama's policies, we can bring the Obama power grab to a screeching halt.

A Republican Senate can also block the confirmation of partisan liberal Democratic judges, using their power either to bargain for better selections or to keep the post vacant until a Republican president takes over.  Similarly, they can use their confirmation power to block overly partisan appointments to federal regulatory boards or executive branch agencies.

Having jammed through the elimination of the 60 vote requirement for confirmations, the Democrats will now be shot with their own bullet and be unable to block Republican sway over nominations and confirmations.  Turnabout is fair play.

Finally, the Republican Senate should bring to the floor and reject all executive branch power grab treaties Obama and others have signed.  These treaties, failing Senate disapproval, remain in effect as a result of the presidential signature under the Vienna Convention.

The treaties we must kill are:

•  The Law of the Sea Treaty.
•  The Small Arms Trade Treaty.
•  The International Criminal Court Treaty.
•  The Code of Conduct in Outer Space.
•  The Rights of the Disabled Treaty.
•  And any Global Climate Change treaty the Administration negotiates.

Some of these treaties are bad ideas.  Others, like the Disability Treaty, are not objectionable except that they usurp American jurisdiction and take away our right to legislate for ourselves in this area.

Control of the Senate can make a vast difference.  Let's hope Republicans get it and turn out in large numbers to bring it about.

Democrats complain there is no evidence of Voter Fraud; read on!

Democrats complain there is no evidence of Voter Fraud; read on!


Ever Wonder Why Republicans Want Voter ID.?
* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).
* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).
* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters .
* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.
* The National SEAL Museum , a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.
* Palm Beach County , FL had a 141% voter turnout .
* In one Ohio County , Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters .

NOTE: Obama "won" in every state that did not require a Photo ID and "lost" in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote .
Imagine that.....and they (Democrats) say VOTER ID is not required and is discriminatory and only hurts minorities....!
ARE WE THE DUMBEST NATION ON THE PLANET OR WHAT.?
It does not take a rocket scientist to see the flaw in that type thinking...i.e., "NO VOTER ID is needed to avoid voter fraud" ....REALLY.....!

ShareThis