Tuesday, November 11, 2014

VETERANS DAY A History of Service & Sacrifice

VETERANS DAY A History of  Service & Sacrifice

World War I resulted in the deaths of 9 million soldiers, sailors, and airmen. The “War To End All Wars” ended at 11 a.m., November 11th, 1918. The leaders decided to cease fighting on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, but the shelling continued until the final seconds as commanders tried in vain to take more territory before the war ended. American Henry Gunther was killed 60 seconds before the fighting stopped. Acting against orders of his sergeant, Gunther fixed his bayonet and charged astonished German troops who were aware the armistice was nearly upon them. They tried to warn the American soldier to stop his attack, but in the end they stopped his charge with a burst of machinegun fire. He was officially the last American killed during what was at that time known simply as “The Great War.”

Soldiers returned home from the trenches of France with horror stories—the likes of which the world had never before heard—and small groups of grateful citizens realized there had to be some small way to repay the debt of this battlefield sacrifice.

At first, November 11th was celebrated as Armistice Day. But the prediction that the horrors of the Great War would be terrible enough to cause nations and their leaders to avoid another conflict did not prove correct. World War I only got its current official name after the next worldwide conflict that would take millions more lives. The surprise Sunday morning attack on Pearl Harbor drew the United States into a war that had already caused tremendous casualties around the Pacific Rim and across much of Europe.

By the time World War II had ended, American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines had witnessed and survived horrors that were unthinkable back in 1918. US Troops in France, World Battlefields across Europe, Asia, Africa, and all the world’s oceans would sometimes take tens of thousands of lives per month. Pilots and aircrews were blown from the sky. Sailors disappeared into the icy depths. And on land, soldiers and Marines faced enemies who seemed willing to commit any atrocity in their effort to promote and advance their ideology. In many cases, the images and the true stories were hidden from the American public, because the truth was deemed just too inflammatory for those on the home front to see. But the men and women who spent time “in theater” were once again asked to bear the weight of unspeakable sacrifice.

And when World War II ended in a blinding white flash on a southern Japanese island, people once again looked for a way to thank those who lived through the hellish battles and incredible sacrifices required to protect the nation. The holiday set aside for those who survived “The Great War” became a day to honor all those who served. On June 1st, 1954, the United States Congress officially replaced the word “Armistice” with the word “Veterans” in order to honor all those who served in the Unites States Armed Forces.

Even the horrors of World War II could not convince world leaders that war was not the answer to their differences. Within five years, Americans were fighting and freezing in Korea. Just over a decade after that, blood was flowing in the jungles of Vietnam. And, lest anyone think that American service members had it easy while serving between major conflicts, there are many “forgotten” events that required the service and sacrifice of those who wear the uniform and serve beneath the flag. Each of these “incidents” made news for a week before slipping off the front pages and drifting into obscurity. But those who were there—those who volunteered to serve and witnessed, first-hand, the struggles required to keep free people free—will never forget places like Beirut, The Gulf of Sidra, Mogadishu, Grenada, Berlin, the Balkans, the Port of Aden, and the countless other locations that never made the national news, but still hold memories for the few who stood between America and her enemies.

As the 21st Century dawned, the United States once again felt the fury of a surprise airborne attack and soon this nation’s sons and daughters were once again called to fight. Tens of thousands once again answered the call. And, as is true of every military operation: All gave some, and some gave all. You see, every single veteran, regardless of the branch of service or the time at which he or she served, wrote a blank check to the United States of America. That check could be redeemed for anything, up to and including the life of the service member.

Those who served did so knowing that they could be sent anywhere and asked to do almost anything in support of policies they did not create and could not amend. They made this promise because they believed they could make a difference as part of an organization dedicated to service and sacrifice. Each of them chose to become part of something bigger than the sum of its parts.

To every man and every woman who has served, who will serve, and who continues to serve; from each branch of the military, know that your commitment to our nation and the freedoms we cherish every day, will never go unnoticed. Your country is forever in your debt and will be forever grateful for your service.

Monday, November 10, 2014

THE CRUSADES: A Direct Response To Islam’s Blood-lust

THE CRUSADES: A Direct Response To Islam’s Blood-lust


by Audrey Russo 

Most of us infidels in the West have been lied to. Trusting the education system, foolishly, we believed all the bunk bundled into our textbooks concerning the period in history (1096 AD -1272 AD) when the Crusades took place…they left out an itty bitty piece of info…This will be great for all your “enlightened” friends…

The real reason WHY the Crusades took place…and here’s the shocker: It was a response to Islam’s aggression!

That’s right…it all began with Muhammed’s implicit threat more than 450 years before the Crusaders entered Jerusalem. He said: “embrace Islam and you will be safe.” (Muhammed’s extortion letter to the Khaibar Jews)

Some facts for your ill-informed friends/family/colleagues:
The Crusades were a delayed response for CENTURIES of Muslim aggression, that grew ever fiercer in the 11th Century. The Muslims focused on Christians and Jews…forcing conversions, plundering and mortally wounding apostates.

The Crusades were a DEFENSIVE action, first called for by Pope Urban II in 1095 at the Council of Clermont.

The Crusades were a response against Jihad, which is obligatory against non-Muslims entering “Muslim lands’”. (Muslim lands are any lands invaded and conquered by Islam.)

The motives of the Crusaders were pure. They were jihad-provoked and not imperialistic actions against a “peaceful”, native Muslim population. The Crusades were NOT for profit, but rather to recover the Holy Land brutally invaded and conquered by Muslims…who conquered for profit and as a notch on their superiority belt.

The lands conquered by the Crusaders were NOT colonized under the Byzantine Empire. The Empire withdrew its support so the Crusaders renounced their agreement.
The Islamic world ripped through the Christian world on a bloody Jihad crusade to propagate Islam. Muslim imperialistic conquest wars were launched for more than 1,500 years against hundreds of nations and over millions of square miles (larger than the British Empire at its peak). The Jihad crusade went from southern France to the Philippines, from Austria to Nigeria, and from central Asia to New Guinea.

The dictionary defines imperialism as “the policy and practice of seeking to dominate the economic and political affairs of weaker countries.” This historical Islamic Jihad WAS imperialistic…and its goals remain the same.

Islam’s greed and lust for bloody domination of non-Muslims and their property CAUSED the Crusades…it doesn’t get simpler than that!


Shalom through strength

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Abandon the scholar-athlete charade

Abandon the scholar-athlete charade

By Walter E. Williams

Last year’s column “Dishonest Educators” (Jan. 9, 2013) reported on the largest school cheating scandal in U.S. history. In more than three-quarters of the 56 Atlanta schools investigated, teachers changed student answers on academic achievement tests. Cheating orders came directly from school administrators. The cheating was brazen. One teacher told a colleague, “I had to give your kids, or your students, the answers because they’re dumb as hell.” Atlanta’s not alone. Teacher cheating has been discovered in other cities, such as Philadelphia, Houston, New York, Detroit, Baltimore, Los Angeles and Washington.

Rampant academic cheating is not confined to primary and secondary schools. Cheating occurs in the nation’s colleges, as discovered during an investigation at the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina, the state’s flagship university. Over two decades, more than 3,100 students enrolled in and received credit for taking nonexistent phantom classes in the university’s department of African and African-American studies. Nearly 50 percent of the students taking the phantom classes were athletes on the university’s football and basketball teams.

Students officially enrolled in African and African-American studies lecture courses that never met. According to a university-commissioned report, Deborah Crowder, the department’s administrative assistant, required students to turn in a single paper. The papers were often largely plagiarized or padded with fluff. The students were given A’s or B’s after a cursory read. The classes were widely known on campus as “paper classes.” The department’s chairman, Julius Nyang’oro, was the professor of record for many of the fake classes. The university’s academic support program for student-athletes notified both Nyang’oro and Crowder of what grades students needed “to remain academically or athletically eligible.”

Professor Nyang’oro retired in 2012, after news of the scheme came to light. A grand jury indicted him on a felony charge for taking money for a class he didn’t teach. Recently, the state’s district attorney’s office dismissed the charges against Nyang’oro because of his cooperation with former federal prosecutor Kenneth Wainstein’s investigation into athletic and academic issues at the university. So far, nine university employees have been fired or are under disciplinary review. Let’s look at the motivation for this gross academic fraud. If you said follow the money, go to the head of the class. UNC’s basketball team generates $20 million in profits for the university. Football generates $22 million. Basketball and football coaches are paid salaries in excess of $2 million. The only way a university can pay those salaries and generate that kind of revenue is to assemble a winning team. That means many universities are more interested in an athlete’s playing skills than in his academic skills. In other words, whether a student can read, write and compute means little compared with whether he can slam-dunk a basketball or make touchdowns.

Last week, UNC Chancellor Carol Folt issued an apology and an institutional mea culpa. It has a hollow ring. She must have been aware of the efforts of Mary Willingham, the whistleblower academic adviser at UNC who had spoken out against the gross fraud regarding the academic performance of revenue-sport athletes. Plus, former UNC basketball player Rashad McCants told ESPN that he received top grades in classes that did not require attendance and that he turned in papers that tutors wrote for him.

This cheating scandal raises another issue, namely that of exploiting athletes for the benefit of universities. I think that the time has come to abandon the athlete-scholar charade. Universities ought to pay athletes a competitive salary in line with everyone else involved in college sports. Most basketball and football players will see their playing days end when they leave college. Many players who participate in university fraud in order to maintain their player eligibility are black. Where will they end up when they graduate in possession of a fraudulent college degree other than sad, embittered, used and having nowhere to turn?

While UNC’s cheating agenda has been fully exposed, I’d bet the rent money that similar fraudulent practices are widespread at other universities, and whistleblowers should come forth.

Is The Man In the White House Mentally Ill?

Is The Man In the White House Mentally Ill?

By Dave Daubenmire 

I am not asking this with my tongue in my cheek. I am as serious as a judge. As I sit here and write, I am listening to Mr. Obama's press conference. Something is very wrong with this guy. He is either mentally ill or demon possessed. Either choice is a possibility. But something is definitely wrong with him. He seems somehow inhuman.

I've lived my entire life in a world of athletic competition. I understand the human emotion that is associated with winning and losing. I grew up with the opening theme of ABC's Wide World of Sports continuously playing in my head. (If I close my eyes I can hear the voice of Jim McKay bouncing around the corners of my brain.)

"Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports... the thrill of victory... and the agony of defeat... the human drama of athletic competition... This is "ABC's Wide World of Sports!"

The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat brings with it emotions. That is why we watch sports. We love the human drama of athletic competition. That's why we have press conferences after games. We love to hear the emotional reaction to winning and losing.
President Obama is a hollow man. He has no feelings. He feels no emotions. The human drama of competition seems to have no outward effect on him.

Can I be blunt? He got his butt kicked. Every talking head on the tube is pointing the finger at his unpopularity. "The bloom is off of the rose. It is a direct repudiation of his policies. The era of Obama is over." It is as if everyone knows it but him.

Politics is nothing more than a beauty contest, and Obama has been voted off of the island. But he acts as if he still owns the island. There seems to be no agony in his defeat. It is not normal. His emotions do not line up with reality. He is either sick, or he is possessed. I'm not laughing. I am serious.

His party rejected him. The American people rejected him. His fawning media has turned their affections in a different direction, yet he shows no emotion. I watch him on the TV. I watch him in his press conference. I watch his eyes as he responds to the media's questions. I believe he is a sick, dangerous man.

I Googled the word 'sociopath.' "A person with a psychopathic personality whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal, and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience."

Bingo. That's him. That's the guy living the life of President of the United States.
I went a bit further and Googled "Characteristics of a Sociopath." Read it for yourself. Permit me to summarize. You recognize his/any mental illness by these traits.
-An oversized ego.
-Lying and showing manipulative behavior.
-Incapable of showing empathy.
-Lack of shame or remorse.
-Staying eerily calm in dangerous situations.
-Behaving irresponsibly or with extreme impulsivity.
-Having few close friends.
-Being charming ---but only superficially.
-Living by the pleasure principle.
-Showing disregard for societal norms.
-Having intense eyes.
The man is either sick or non-human. He does not react like a normal human being.
Consider this from the article:
"Sociopaths can be very charismatic and friendly -- because they know it will help them get what they want. "They are expert con artists and always have a secret agenda," Rosenberg said. "People are so amazed when they find that someone is a sociopath because they're so amazingly effective at blending in. They're masters of disguise. Their main tool to keep them from being discovered is a creation of an outer personality."

As M.E. Thomas described in a post for Psychology Today: "You would like me if you met me. I have the kind of smile that is common among television show characters and rare in real life, perfect in its sparkly teeth dimensions and ability to express pleasant invitation."

Reading that gives me the willies...how about you?

No emotions. Cold. Calculating. He doesn't even know that he lost. He is unaware that he has been rejected. He acts as if it is business as usual while the entire Democratic Party is wishing for a moving van out in front of the White House.

In my coaching career, I lost a lot of games. I know how it feels. I know how it makes you react. He has destroyed his party. His friends are running for cover, but he acts as if he has just won.

Sociopaths are dangerous. Some famous sociopaths in recent history include Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, and John Wayne Gazy.

You laugh at me. You ridicule what I say because I compare him to serial killers. Go ahead. Laugh. He displays all of the characteristics of the above mentioned goons. They were charismatic and likeable.

What kind of man plays golf after a young man's head is chopped off? What kind of man disappears for hours while some of his "employees" are being killed overseas? What kind of man permits a deadly disease to be freely introduced into a society? What kind of man acts as if he won when the whole world watched him lose? What kind of man believes his own lies?

President Obama is either sick or demon possessed. Red flags are everywhere we look. Will his own party stop him? Will anyone stop him? President Obama is a sick, dangerous man.

I just thought someone needed to point that out.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

GOP WIN: People Have Spoken Clearly, Will Politicians Listen

GOP WIN: People Have Spoken Clearly, Will Politicians Listen

by Allan Erickson 

Well, the people have spoken, and the messages are clear: we don’t like Obama’s policies, we reject the Democrat agenda of big government, a bad economy, weak foreign policy and the politics of anger and division, and, although we are disappointed with Republicans as well, we hope they will turn the tide and work to solve problems in practical, common sense ways.

This is being called a wave election.  Republicans took control of the Senate.  They now hold 32 governorships, and they extended their presence in the House of Representatives. It would appear voters want what conservatives have offered all along:  limited government, fiscal sanity, economic freedom, personal liberty, strong foreign policy, and common sense domestic policies.

In other words, folks appear to be finished with Obama’s radical, secular progressive agenda, one that has failed monumentally on every front.

The challenge now is for Republicans to step up.
We hope Rand Paul and John McCain bury the hatchet.  We trust Republicans will stop the infighting.  Our deepest hope is Republicans and conservatives and Tea Party folks come together and agree on the two-fold brilliance of the Reagan approach:
1. DO NOT ATTACK ANYONE, ESPECIALLY THY FELLOW CONSERVATIVE
2. UNIFY AROUND A COMMON SENSE, WORKABLE PLATORM DESIGNED TO ADDRESS THE TOP CONCERNS OF THE PEOPLE

Polling shows us clearly the American people want solutions.  They want progress.  They want prosperity and security.  They want a government working for them, finally!  Here are their top concerns:

Number one: it’s the economy, hands down.  The party that deals with ObamaCare, reins in regulation, approves the Keystone Pipeline, reduces taxation, and opens opportunity so that jobs are created and prosperity flourishes, that is the party that will take the White House in 2016.

Number two:  security.  Whether it is terrorism, Ebola, foreign threats, ISIS or the border and related immigration issues, the American people are frustrated with a government that cannot seem to do anything.  The party that enhances security, addresses real threats in realistic ways, succeeds in defeating our enemies, and provides real border security is the party that will take the White House in 2016 and take control of Congress (or retain it).

Number three: the size of government, government spending, government debt, inefficient federal bureaucracy, and corruption in government.   Obviously these are monster problems that will not be solved in the next two years. However, the party that presents a clear message articulating a real set of solutions will be the party that earns the confidence of the majority of voters.


The Republicans have been handed a golden opportunity this election.  Citizens have been clear.  It is now time for Republicans to be clear, unified, consistent and effective, reaching out to those Democrats who are likewise ready to put country before party.  If that involves the President, all the better, but don’t hold your breath. 

Thursday, November 6, 2014

You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper, According to the Bible

You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper, According to the Bible

By Gary North

For over 100 years, theological liberals, who in most cases are also political liberals, have used this famous passage in the fourth chapter of the book of Genesis to justify the idea that individuals are responsible for the health and welfare of other individuals, and then, taking it a step further, they conclude that the state is responsible for the health and welfare of people in need.

On the surface of it, the text offers not the slightest hint of any such interpretation. Let us consider the setting. Cain has killed Abel. God then cross-examines him, knowing full well exactly what he has done. Cain, being an incomparable fool, thinks he can fool God. So, he asked a rhetorical question in response to God's very specific question, namely, "Where is your brother?" Cain answered rhetorically: "Am I my brother's keeper?" The issue here was not economic welfare; the issue here was the location of Abel's body.

Cain knew exactly where that body was. So did God. God was simply making a point: He cross-examines individuals before He condemns them. He investigates the facts before He renders judgment. In this case, Cain was about to come under historical judgment. But he thought that he might deflect this, at least for a time, by playing the fool. After all, he implicitly argued, there was no good reason why he should know where Abel was. He was not in charge of Abel. He was not, in other words, Abel's keeper.

The implication of this rhetorical response is this: people who are legally responsible for the affairs of other people are the equivalent of caretakers in an asylum for the mentally disabled. They have control over the inmates, because the inmates are incapable of taking care of themselves. The caretakers supervise the daily activities of the inmates. They make certain that the inmates do not stray far from their cells. In other words, they exercise physical and emotional control over those people whose relatives are no longer willing to exercise responsibility, and who have transferred this legal responsibility to professionals.
Cain was quite correct. He was not a caretaker of any kind. He was a murderer. No one had entrusted the life of his brother into his hands. To the extent that a caretaker over a group of inmates exercises control over their activities, to that extent Cain's characterization of a keeper was accurate. To the extent that the incarcerated has almost no authority over his activities, Cain's assessment was correct. He was not his brother's caretaker.

The concept of keeper in this case is descriptive of the implications of the welfare state. When theological liberals and their political allies designate somebody who needs economic assistance as someone who ought to be locked up, controlled, and managed for his own good, as if the person were a mental defective, they can legitimately appeal correctly to Cain's concept of a keeper. But this is not what the defenders of the Social Gospel and the welfare state ever say explicitly. They invoke the language of the King James Version of the Bible, with a strong accent on economic responsibility, but they neglect the more fundamental aspect of that passage, namely, the judicial responsibility of caretakers to control the activities of those who have been placed under their authority.

When we think of the biblical concept of a keeper, we should have in mind someone who serves as a gamekeeper in a zoo. He keeps those under his authority under tight observation and control. They have to have someone who intervenes on their behalf. They are not capable of making their own decisions. But the theological and political liberals who invoke this passage as a justification of the welfare state prefer that we not think of the setting of the original verbal exchange. They do not want us to think clearly about the nature of economic responsibility, judicial authority, and the absence of freedom in the lives of those who are being kept by professional keepers.

So, they try to create enormous guilt on the part of Christians specifically, and also the general public, by invoking the phrase, "my brother's keeper." It is good politics, but it is rotten exegesis. It creates a sense of guilt, where no sense of guilt should be operative at all. It creates a willingness on the part of individuals to write checks of their own, and when the checks are insufficient to place a sufficient number of people under their care, they call upon the civil government to write checks. They see that these poor people need help, but they do not see that the judicial context of the original passage had to do, not simply with help, but with judicial incapacity on the part of those being supervised.

Cain said he did not know where his brother was. His brother was an independent person. Cain was not his caretaker. Cain was not his supervisor. Cain, in short, was not his keeper.
If you get the idea that I think that theological liberals who defend the social gospel are manipulators of the public, you get the idea. They will twist the Bible in order to promote a concept of the welfare state which does not exist in any text, Old Testament or New Testament. There is simply no biblical justification for the welfare state. I wrote 31 volumes of exegesis to prove this point. But the guilt manipulation goes on, because liberals want to get their hands in other people's wallets, and they use guilt manipulation as their primary means of achieving their goal.


Anyone who cites this passage as a defense of the welfare state is either a theological ignoramus or highly skilled guilt manipulator. In either case, you would be wise to ignore him.

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Small Business for Sale - Owner Confidential

Franchise Sale - Owner Confidential

Cincinnati, Ohio Metro Area


A Profitable Business You Can Be Proud Of!

A franchise model is designed to do two things: Service the customer and make the owners money. It's that simple. Our customers are seniors, busy families and small business owners that cannot or choose not to do what our services provide. We have developed the trust with our existing client base which has resulted in ongoing repeat business.  Our owners focus on managing the business and ensuring unique, individual customers’ needs are met. If you answer yes to one or more of these questions, we must talk.
  • -     Are you a business professional who believes your customers deserve a trusted service provider who delivers on their promise?
  • -        Are you tired of working long hours for someone else and building their wealth?
  • -        Have you recently left your big corporate job, but are not ready to retire?
  • -        Are you ready to make the money you know you are worth?
  • -        Are you ready to build your own personal wealth?
  • -        Do you enjoy creating customized solutions which will consistently please your customers?
  • -    Are you ready to put your ideas and strategies into place instead of the "Bosses"?

The owner and the franchise will personally guide you every step of the way to become a successful franchise owner. Start the qualification process today!
What's in it for you:
  • Turnkey business - launch in weeks!
  • Industry leading profit margins
  • Home based
  • Low Start-Up Costs
  • 10 year old franchise with recurring revenue – loyal customers and referrals
  • Exclusive, protected territory

Typical franchise owner:
"To us [franchise] has meant freedom. We had the desire to own our own business and to have the freedom to manage our lives around that. However, we knew we needed the support of a franchise to make that desire a reality. The [franchise] program and Operations team have done just that for us. We are proud to be part of the [franchise] family of other franchise owners who continuously support one another!"
Sarah Ross
Franchise Owner

Recession resistant - $40 Billion industry that can't be outsourced!
5 revenue streams and more:
  • Residential (Interior and Exterior)
  • Commercial and office buildings
  • Real Estate-based programs
  • No constraints to adding adjacent services that do not compete with the corporate franchise

"The reasonable start-up cost and return on investment are what attracted me and the proven systems and operations support provided a structure that facilitated immediate success. The experienced leadership team is forward thinking and driven to help me succeed. I highly recommend franchise ownership for those looking to leverage their leadership skills and commitment to succeed as business owners"
Rich Whitaker
Franchise Owner
_________________________________________________________________________

Franchise Summary:
The largest services franchise company in North America, with system wide sales approaching $250 million. There are over 360 locations in the US and Canada, and the Pennsylvania based company plans to have 550 locations operating by the end of 2016. The painting service industry is a large one, at over $40 billion annually, and what makes our franchise unique in the  service category, is the fact that their owners drive revenue from both residential (B2C) and commercial (B2B) clients. Business owners scale by adding sales people for both residential and commercial sales, and most of the owners use subcontractors to produce the work - keeping overhead low.- Industry Leader- Low employee model- Strong Item 19 (ask to see it)- Great Validation (Our franchise is ranked #1 in the Home Service category for overall franchisee satisfaction by Franchise Business Review and #94 in Entrepreneur Magazine's Top 500 Franchises)


To be initially qualified, interested parties must:

  • -        Pre-approved for a business loan or cash: capital requirement $100K
  • -        Demonstrate financial stability and liquidity


 If you are interested, please contact:
Bill McAdory: Consultant, On behalf of Owner
Mobile:            513-703-5355
email:              billmcadory@earthlink.net

ShareThis