Kerry on Iran Deal:
Blame Bush
by Joel B. Pollak
Secretary of State
John Kerry, defending the Geneva agreement on Iran's nuclear program, told ABC
News' This Week that despite the deal's flaws, it was, at least,
better than what the Bush administration had done:
In 2003, Iran made an offer to the
Bush administration, that they would, in fact, do major things with respect to
their program. They had 164 centrifuges. Nobody took--nothing has happened.
Therefore here we are in 2013, they have 19,000 centrifuges, and they're closer
to a weapon. You cannot sit there and pretend that you're just going to get the
thing you want while they continue to move towards the program that they've
been chasing.
So, to the extent that
the new Iran deal is bad, it is Bush's fault, according to Secretary Kerry.
Here are some facts
Kerry conveniently leaves out. First, Iran
slowed its nuclear program temporarily after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. That
was the context of Iran's "offer." Second, It has almost always responded to the threat of military
action, and almost never abided by international agreements. Third, the Bush administration did not
just "sit there." It succeeded in pushing UN Security Council
resolutions that banned all nuclear enrichment by Iran. That set the stage for
the increased international sanctions on Iran, for which the Obama
administration takes credit but which it has tried to slow down ever since
taking office.
If anyone has just "sat there," it
has been the Obama administration, which watched as France took the lead in
pushing for a slightly tougher deal that would do a little more to protect
Western interests and American allies.
In addition to blaming
Bush, what Kerry is effectively saying is that there was nothing else the U.S.
could have done--that it had been outfoxed by Iran, and had no other option. He is describing the agreement not as
a victory but admitting that it is effectively a kind of surrender. In a
backhanded way, he is correct.
No comments:
Post a Comment